What does the term “Judicial Activism” mean to you? Describe. [Answer Limit: 125 words] [UKPSC 2016]
Reena BhattBegginer
Resources & Suggestions
Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles
On: April 5, 2025
Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (5 April 2025)
Examine the evolution of cooperatives in independent India and their role in advancing agricultural development. (Answer in 150 words) स्वतंत्रता के बाद भारत में सहकारी समितियों के विकास और कृषि क्षेत्र में उनके योगदान पर विचार करें। (उत्तर 150 शब्दों ...
On: April 4, 2025
Comments:
0
भारतीय अर्थव्यवस्था में कार्यबल का औपचारिकीकरण की आवश्यकता
अनौपचारिक क्षेत्र की भूमिका: भारत का अनौपचारिक क्षेत्र 93% कार्यबल को रोजगार देता है। हालिया विकास: 2023-24 में प्रतिष्ठानों में 12.84%, कार्यबल में 10.01% और GVA में 16.52% की वृद्धि की संभावना। औपचारिकीकरण की वर्तमान स्थिति परिभाषा: अनौपचारिक आर्थिक गतिविधियों ...
On: April 4, 2025
Comments:
0
Need of Workforce Formalisation in Indian Economy
Informal Sector Dominance: India’s informal sector employs 93% of the workforce. Recent Growth: In 2023-24, the sector saw: 12.84% increase in establishments. 10.01% rise in workforce. 16.52% growth in Gross Value Added (GVA). Current Status of Formalisation Definition: Formalisation means ...
Judicial Activism: Definition and Explanation
Judicial Activism refers to the proactive role of the judiciary in interpreting laws and the Constitution to promote social justice, fundamental rights, and human rights. This approach empowers courts to step in when legislative or executive branches fail to act in the public interest.
Recent examples include the Supreme Court’s intervention in the right to privacy case (2017), which recognized privacy as a fundamental right, and the judgment on decriminalizing homosexuality (Section 377) in 2018, marking a significant step for LGBTQ+ rights.
While judicial activism plays a crucial role in safeguarding rights and addressing social issues, it faces criticism for potentially overstepping judicial boundaries and disrupting the separation of powers. Thus, it remains a vital yet contentious aspect of contemporary jurisprudence.