How does the portrayal of female characters in classic literature impact the societal attitudes towards women during the time the work was written?
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The portrayal of the female character in classic Indian literature deeply influenced society’s perspectives about women during its time. From epics like “Ramayana” and “Mahabharata” to classical Sanskrit dramas like “Shakuntala” by Kalidasa, the female characters have been presented in various roles: from an obedient wife and mother to a height of spiritual wisdom and strength. For example, Sita of the “Ramayana” is an epic character who represents chastity and loyalty, so expectations are created regarding the roles that women should play in marriage and family life.
On the contrary, other characters, like Draupadi in the “Mahabharata,” showcase a much more powerful and complex feminine personality in a male-dominated patriarchal society. However, even in this setting, attitudes regarding women have quite often been leaning toward patriarchal interpretations, which reinforce the obedient and servile roles of women.
The dual portrayals combined to create a society that celebrated women’s virtues, while limiting their autonomy. Such portrayals in the classic literature reflect on as well as shape the norms of society and thus establish values and ideals that put women on pedestals but restrict their levels of freedom. This influences their status and rights in the society for generations.
Literature and literary trends have always been influenced by the societal conditions of the time. A literary text is not just a “self-contained system” as formalists would argue. Rather it holds a mirror to the society, culture, politics and ideologies of the time that it was written as, as contemporary theorist, Terry Eagleton would put forth in his essay, “Introduction: What is Literature?”. Similarly, the treatment of women in classic literature, is obviously a commentary on how women were treated during that time.
To instantiate, one can think of the character of Clarissa, from Alexander Pope’s classic mock-epic The Rape of the Lock. She talks about female virtue and moral didacticism in her speech. Given that the book was written in the neo-classical age, where a typically patriarchal society is at play, Clarissa seems to uphold all the values of the society. One can argue that perhaps she is the embodiment of everything that neo-classical society wanted women to be: demure, domestic and bound by their marietal status.
Other examples of such characters can be, Jane Bennet, from Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, who truly holds the moral virtues of the Regency era, where a women’s dignity was measured by their ability to secure a husband; or Nora Helmer from Henrik Ibsen’s modern drama “Dolls House”, who is typically shows an enlightened women rejecting her husband for her ill-treatment.