Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Another opinion holds that the establishment of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) under State Acts has contributed to India’s food inflation as well as hindered the growth of agriculture. Analyze critically. (200 words) [UPSC 2014]
The Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) set up under State Acts have been a topic of debate, with some arguing they hinder agricultural development and contribute to food inflation in India.
*Structural Issues with APMCs*
APMCs were established to ensure farmers receive fair prices for their produce, but they’ve been criticized for restricting competition and favoring monopolies .The licensing of commission agents has led to a monopoly of licensed traders, creating a barrier for new entrepreneurs . This limitation has resulted in price variations and the formation of cartels linked to caste and political networks.
*Limitations of Regulated Markets*
Regulated markets under APMCs have several drawbacks, including:
– Discouraging Direct Purchases: Exporters and processors can’t buy directly from farmers, hindering the processing and exporting of agricultural products .
– Restricting Private Investment: Only state governments can set up markets, preventing private players from investing in marketing infrastructure .
– Multiple Handling and Mandi Charges: Fragmented markets within states lead to increased prices for consumers without benefiting farmers .
*Alternative Approaches*
Some states, like Bihar, have repealed their APMC Acts, but this hasn’t necessarily transformed agricultural markets or spurred competition . Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka have undertaken regulatory reforms, enabling competition and improving marketing practices .
*Way Forward*
To address the issues, the government should consider location-specific policies, well-directed investment, and well-functioning agricultural institutions . Regulatory reforms should focus on enabling competition, reducing middlemen intervention, and creating an efficient marketplace . The National Agricultural Market (NAM) initiative aims to create a unified national market for agricultural commodities, but its effectiveness depends on the successful implementation of these reforms .
Model Answer
Introduction
Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) were established under state acts in the 1950s to enhance transparency and eliminate trader discretion in agricultural markets. These committees regulate the sale of notified agricultural products, which vary by state and typically include essential cereals and vegetables. However, there is a growing perception that APMCs have impeded agricultural development and contributed to food inflation in India.
Body
Monopoly and Cartelization
APMCs often create a monopoly that restricts farmers’ access to better customers, thereby reducing their profitability. Agents within APMCs frequently form cartels, manipulating prices by restraining competitive bidding. This leads to produce being sold at artificially low prices, while hoarding by agents exacerbates food inflation, particularly for perishable goods, which farmers cannot store or bargain over effectively.
Entry Barriers and Costs
The high license fees and additional costs such as commissions, marketing fees, and APMC cess further burden farmers. These financial barriers not only hinder agricultural growth but also increase the risk of food inflation by raising the overall cost of produce.
Conflict of Interest
APMCs operate with a dual role as both regulators and market participants, which creates a conflict of interest. This duality undermines their regulatory function, allowing vested interests to manipulate market conditions to their advantage.
Other Manipulations
Agents often engage in practices that disadvantage farmers, such as withholding payment slips or blocking payments for dubious reasons. This lack of transparency hampers farmers’ ability to secure loans and invest in future crops, leading to stagnation in agricultural productivity.
Conclusion
While the central government introduced the Model APMC Act in 2003 to address these issues, its implementation has been inconsistent across states. Some states, like Bihar and Delhi, have abolished APMCs, but this has not significantly improved agricultural conditions or reduced food inflation. The challenges of food inflation stem from a combination of structural issues, including inadequate supply chains and high wastage, with APMCs being a contributing factor that requires reform.
Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) and Their Impact on Agriculture and Food Inflation
Introduction Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) were established under state legislation to regulate agricultural markets and ensure fair prices for farmers. However, there is a viewpoint that APMCs have hindered agricultural development and contributed to food inflation in India.
Impact on Agricultural Development
Contribution to Food Inflation
Reforms and Recent Developments
Conclusion While APMCs were established to protect farmers’ interests, their operational inefficiencies, market control, and impact on transaction costs have contributed to impediments in agricultural development and food inflation. Comprehensive reforms are needed to address these issues and enhance the effectiveness of agricultural marketing in India.