Roadmap for Answer Writing
-
Introduction
- Define the concept of non-performance of duty by public servants.
- State your position: Agree that it is a form of corruption.
- Briefly mention the implications of this view.
-
Body
- Justify your agreement with specific points and examples.
A. Breach of Trust
- Point: Public servants are entrusted with responsibilities to serve the public.
- Example: Delhi gang-rape case (2012).
- Fact: A police officer’s negligence in this case led to a breach of public trust (BBC News, 2012).
B. Wasting Public Resources
- Point: Non-performance results in inefficient use of public funds.
- Example: Commonwealth Games scam (2010).
- Fact: Misuse of funds led to cost overruns and substandard infrastructure (The Hindu, 2010).
C. Hindering Progress and Development
- Point: Non-performance can delay important public projects.
- Example: Delayed Mumbai Metro Line 2A.
- Fact: Bureaucratic inefficiencies caused significant delays, affecting transportation development (Times of India, 2020).
D. Facilitating Corruption
- Point: Non-performance creates opportunities for corrupt practices.
- Example: Vyapam scam (2013).
- Fact: Manipulation of entrance exams highlighted how negligence can enable corruption (The Indian Express, 2013).
E. Violation of Legal and Ethical Obligations
- Point: Public servants are bound by laws and ethical standards.
- Example: 2G spectrum scam (2008).
- Fact: Officials violated regulations in spectrum allocation, resulting in massive losses (The Economic Times, 2012).
-
Conclusion
- Summarize the key points supporting the view that non-performance of duty is a form of corruption.
- Emphasize the need for accountability and integrity in public service to protect public trust and resources.
Relevant Facts
- Definition of Non-Performance: Refers to public servants failing to fulfill their assigned duties.
- Breach of Trust:
- Source: BBC News (2012).
- Fact: A police officer’s failure to act in the Delhi gang-rape case led to significant public distrust.
- Wasting Public Resources:
- Source: The Hindu (2010).
- Fact: The Commonwealth Games scam involved misallocation of funds, leading to inefficiencies.
- Hindering Progress:
- Source: Times of India (2020).
- Fact: Bureaucratic delays in the Mumbai Metro project hindered essential transportation services.
- Facilitating Corruption:
- Source: The Indian Express (2013).
- Fact: The Vyapam scam showcased how negligence can lead to widespread corruption.
- Violation of Legal and Ethical Standards:
- Source: The Economic Times (2012).
- Fact: The 2G spectrum scam demonstrated severe violations in regulatory practices.
By following this roadmap, you can construct a well-structured and compelling answer that effectively addresses the question.
Non-Performance of Duty as a Form of Corruption
Agreement with the View:
**1. Definition and Impact
a. Definition of Corruption:
Corruption is often understood as the abuse of power for personal gain. Non-performance of duty by a public servant can be seen as a form of corruption if it results in personal or political gain, or neglects the public’s needs.
b. Impact on Governance:
When a public servant fails to perform their duties, it undermines governance and public trust. For instance, Bihar’s 2019 flood relief operations faced criticism for inadequate response, leading to severe hardships for affected people. The non-performance of duties by officials exacerbated the situation and can be viewed as a corruption of responsibility.
**2. Accountability and Consequences
a. Accountability Issues:
Non-performance often reflects a lack of accountability and commitment, akin to corruption. For example, the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in some states was hampered by inefficiencies and negligence, impacting the effectiveness of the vaccination drive.
b. Consequences for Public Welfare:
Such non-performance can lead to poor public service delivery and a loss of public resources, which can be seen as corruption. It deprives citizens of their entitled services and damages the integrity of the public service system.
Conclusion:
Yes, non-performance of duty can be viewed as a form of corruption because it involves the misuse of entrusted power, leading to negative consequences for public welfare and governance.
Model Answer
Introduction
The non-performance of duty by a public servant can indeed be viewed as a form of corruption. This perspective stems from the violation of accountability principles and the breach of public trust that results when public servants fail to fulfill their responsibilities. Such failures not only hinder the public interest but also deny citizens their rightful entitlements. Therefore, I agree that non-performance of duty constitutes a form of corruption.
Body
Breach of Trust
Public servants are entrusted with specific duties to serve the public interest. When they neglect their responsibilities, it represents a breach of that trust. For example, in the Delhi gang-rape case (2012), a police officer’s failure to act promptly resulted in a significant breach of public trust, highlighting the dire consequences of non-performance (BBC News, 2012).
Wasting Public Resources
Non-performance often leads to the ineffective use of public resources. The Commonwealth Games scam (2010) is a stark example, where funds allocated for infrastructure were misused, resulting in cost overruns and substandard construction (The Hindu, 2010).
Hindering Progress and Development
Failure to perform duties can obstruct societal progress. The delayed Mumbai Metro Line 2A project exemplifies this issue, where bureaucratic inefficiencies caused significant delays, hampering essential transportation development (Times of India, 2020).
Facilitating Corruption
Non-performance can create an environment conducive to corruption. The Vyapam scam (2013), where government officials manipulated entrance exams, illustrates how negligence in duty can lead to bribery and irregular admissions (The Indian Express, 2013).
Violation of Legal and Ethical Obligations
Public servants are bound by legal and ethical standards. The 2G spectrum scam (2008) showed how officials violated regulations in allocating telecom licenses, resulting in enormous financial losses for the government (The Economic Times, 2012).
Conclusion
The non-performance of duty by civil servants is indeed a form of corruption, with profound implications for public trust and resource allocation. It is crucial to foster greater accountability and integrity within public service to ensure that civil servants diligently fulfill their responsibilities in serving the public interest.