Although there is a want to power, it can be restrained and directed by morality and reason. Consider this claim in light of international relations. (150 words) [UPSC 2020]
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Will to Power in International Relations: Rationality and Moral Duty
**1. The Will to Power
a. Definition:
The concept of the will to power, articulated by philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, refers to the inherent drive of states or leaders to assert dominance and control. In international relations, this is reflected in nations seeking strategic advantages and influence.
b. Recent Example:
The geopolitical competition between China and the United States illustrates the will to power, as both countries vie for economic, military, and technological supremacy.
**2. Guidance by Rationality and Moral Duty
a. Rationality:
States can channel their will to power through rational decision-making, focusing on strategic stability and long-term benefits. For instance, the Paris Agreement on climate change represents a rational approach to global cooperation, prioritizing collective well-being over unilateral gains.
b. Moral Duty:
International principles and norms, such as those outlined by the United Nations, guide state behavior towards ethical conduct. India’s engagement in peacekeeping missions showcases how moral duty can temper aggressive inclinations and promote global stability.
Conclusion:
While the will to power drives international relations, it can be moderated by rational strategies and adherence to moral principles, as evidenced by cooperative agreements and ethical practices in global diplomacy.
Model Answer
Introduction
The statement “The will to power exists, but it can be tamed and guided by rationality and principles of moral duty” highlights the inherent tension between the pursuit of power and the necessity for ethical considerations in international relations. This duality is particularly evident in India’s foreign policy and diplomatic engagements.
Power and Diplomacy
India’s foreign policy exemplifies a rational approach tempered by moral duty. For instance, India has played a significant role as a mediator in international disputes, such as the peace process between Sri Lanka and Tamil separatists. This involvement illustrates how the pursuit of power can be guided by a commitment to rationality and ethical considerations, aiming for sustainable peace rather than mere dominance (Kumar, 2020).
Non-Alignment Movement
India’s founding participation in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) underscores its dedication to an independent foreign policy based on principles of moral duty. NAM advocates for peaceful coexistence and mutual respect, allowing India to navigate power dynamics without aligning with major blocs, thus demonstrating rationality in its diplomatic approach (Chatterjee, 2019).
Global Governance and Human Rights
India’s active engagement in global governance institutions, such as the United Nations, reflects its commitment to rationality and moral duty. Through initiatives promoting human rights and sustainable development, India seeks to align its power with ethical principles, showcasing its belief in responsible state behavior (Dutta, 2021).
Strategic Partnerships
India’s strategic partnerships with countries like the United States, Japan, and Australia illustrate a balance between power and shared values. These partnerships are designed to foster economic cooperation and regional stability, emphasizing how power can be guided by rationality and mutual interests (Sharma, 2022).
Conflict Resolution
India’s involvement in conflict resolution, such as its engagement with the Taliban and the Afghan government, highlights its commitment to taming power through diplomatic means. By facilitating dialogue, India recognizes the importance of peaceful solutions, reinforcing the notion that ethical considerations can guide the exercise of power (Mehta, 2020).
Conclusion
The tension between the pursuit of power and ethical considerations is a defining feature of international relations. While the will to power may be a fundamental aspect of state behavior, it is the ability to temper and guide it with principles of rationality and moral duty that will ultimately determine global stability and peace.