“बेईमान अधिकारियों के अभियोजन के लिये सरकार की स्वीकृति की आवश्यकता, भ्रष्टाचार के लिये एक सुरक्षा की ढाल है।” इस कथन का परीक्षण कीजिये। (125 Words) [UPPSC 2020]
TeamSupreme
Resources & Suggestions
Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts
Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र
मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
India’s Disaster Management
The article discusses the growing tensions between the Centre and states regarding disaster relief funding in India. It emphasizes the need for a transparent and equitable disaster management framework. Key Disaster Threats India Faces Increasing Frequency of Extreme Weather Events ...
Government Sanction for Prosecuting Dishonest Officials as a Shield for Corruption
1. Protective Shield: The requirement of government sanction for prosecuting dishonest officials often serves as a barrier to combating corruption. This procedural hurdle can delay or obstruct legal actions against corrupt practices. For instance, in the Aadhar data leak case, delays in obtaining sanction for prosecution have hampered swift legal responses.
2. Bureaucratic Delays: Bureaucratic red tape in obtaining sanction can be exploited to avoid accountability. The Vijay Mallya case illustrates how delays in sanctioning prosecution have allowed prolonged financial misconduct.
3. Accountability Evasion: The requirement can be misused to shield corrupt officials from legal consequences, thereby perpetuating corruption. For example, allegations against senior officials in the Delhi Police have faced delays due to this requirement.
Conclusion: While intended to prevent misuse of authority, the sanction requirement often acts as a protective shield for corruption, delaying justice and undermining accountability.