What does “Linc of Poverty” actually mean? Give an explanation of India’s “Poverty Alleviation” Programme.(200 Words) [UPPSC 2020]
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
*Line of Poverty:*
The Line of Poverty, also known as the Poverty Line, is an economic benchmark that defines the minimum level of income required to meet basic needs and sustain life. It’s calculated based on the cost of a basket of essential goods and services.
*Poverty Alleviation Programmes in India:*
India has implemented various programmes to alleviate poverty, focusing on:
1. Employment generation
2. Social security
3. Education and skill development
4. Health and nutrition
5. Infrastructure development
*Major Programmes:*
1. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA): Guarantees 100 days of wage employment per year.
2. Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY): Provides financial assistance for self-employment.
3. Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana – National Rural Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NRLM): Enhances livelihoods through skill development and entrepreneurship.
4. Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY): Promotes financial inclusion through bank accounts.
5. National Health Mission (NHM): Improves healthcare access.
6. Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA): Universalizes elementary education.
7. Indira Awas Yojana (IAY): Provides housing for the poor.
*Targeted Interventions:*
1. Below Poverty Line (BPL) families
2. Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST)
3. Women and children
4. Rural and urban poor
*Outcomes:*
1. Poverty reduction: 22% (2011) to 10% (2019)
2. Increased employment opportunities
3. Improved health and education outcomes
4. Enhanced financial inclusion
*Challenges:*
1. Inefficient implementation
2. Limited resources
3. Corruption
4. Inadequate targeting
*Reforms:*
1. Streamline programme implementation
2. Enhance convergence among schemes
3. Improve targeting and monitoring
4. Increase funding and resource allocation
The term ‘the link of poverty’ encompasses the complex relationships among poverty, income, race, discrimination, and access to services. The structure which binds these various factors demonstrates different and often multidimensional poverty experience such as a lack of income, a lack of employment, education, and discrimination. Each of these factors are interconnected and collectively prevent individuals and communities from reaching a minimum standard of living.
The ‘Poverty Alleviation’ Programme in India consists of various efforts to decrease poverty, with a particular emphasis on the poorest households. A large number of evaluations and modifications have been made to the poverty alleviation efforts, despite some degree of success, areas of research and program evaluation are quite limited and there remain several challenges. The objective of the Poverty Alleviation Programme aims to decrease poverty through a number of governmental initiatives to target specific subgroups, namely individuals that fall below the poverty line17. Significant initiatives such as the Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP) specifically target self-employment through skill-based training for marginalized communities15. Other initiatives consist of the Pradhan Mantri Grameen Awaas Yojana, which assists in providing housing specifically for the poorest communities, and the National Social Assistance Programme which aims to provide social security initiatives to the aged, disabled, and other vulnerable groups.
Although the Poverty Alleviation Program in India has caused a decline in poverty levels over the years, this is not without challenges, including urban-rural disparities, and how effective the schemes are in the real world1. Evaluations have ongoing demonstrated while programs such as the IRDP, and the National Social Assistance Programme, had some positive impacts, further critiques noted inefficiencies and useful strategies to more effectively outreach to intended beneficiaries19. Evaluations of this nature reinforce the need for continuously improving, redeveloping poverty alleviation efforts in response to changing societal needs.