Is conscience a more trustworthy guide when making ethical decisions than laws, rules, and regulations? Talk about it. (150 words)[UPSC 2023]
TeamSupreme
Resources & Suggestions
Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts
Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र
मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
India’s Disaster Management
The article discusses the growing tensions between the Centre and states regarding disaster relief funding in India. It emphasizes the need for a transparent and equitable disaster management framework. Key Disaster Threats India Faces Increasing Frequency of Extreme Weather Events ...
Conscience vs. Laws in Ethical Decision-Making
Conscience as a Guide: Conscience refers to an individual’s internal sense of right and wrong, often shaped by personal values and ethics. It can provide nuanced guidance in situations where laws or rules may fall short. For example, the case of whistleblowers like Edward Snowden demonstrates how conscience can lead individuals to take actions that challenge legal boundaries but align with their personal sense of justice and integrity. Snowden’s revelations about mass surveillance were driven by his conscience, despite legal repercussions.
Laws, Rules, and Regulations: Laws and regulations are established to provide a standardized framework for ethical behavior and societal order. They are designed to be objective and apply universally. For instance, environmental regulations such as the Paris Agreement create binding commitments to combat climate change, providing a structured approach to a global issue that personal conscience alone might not fully address.
Comparison: While conscience can offer moral clarity in complex or ambiguous situations, laws and regulations provide a consistent, enforceable framework to ensure broader compliance and accountability. In many cases, a balance between personal conscience and legal standards is necessary to address ethical dilemmas effectively.
In summary, while conscience provides personal moral guidance, laws and regulations offer essential structure and uniformity for ethical decision-making.
Model Answer
Introduction
Conscience, highlighted by thinkers like Socrates, acts as an intrinsic moral compass, guiding individuals in ethical judgments and actions. For instance, it prompts immediate assistance to an accident victim. Conversely, laws, rules, and regulations are structured frameworks established by authorities to maintain order and ensure justice, such as traffic laws that govern road behavior.
Reliability of Conscience Compared to Laws
Moral Autonomy
Conscience serves as an internal guide, reflecting an individual’s core values, enabling moral autonomy in distinguishing right from wrong. Mahatma Gandhi exemplified this during the Indian independence movement, adhering to his “inner voice” principle, showcasing moral decision-making independent of external authority.
Personal Accountability
Relying on conscience fosters personal accountability, as individuals take ownership of their actions based on moral judgments. Whistleblowers like Satyendra Dubey, who exposed corruption, demonstrate the courage and accountability that conscience can inspire.
Adaptability
Conscience can navigate complex ethical dilemmas by considering context and nuance. For example, during the Kerala floods, individuals acted beyond legal mandates, driven by their moral compass to assist those in need.
Consideration of Consequences
Conscience prompts consideration of the broader ethical consequences of actions. Ashok Khemka, an IAS officer, upheld his principles despite facing frequent transfers, emphasizing the impact of individual decisions on society.
Ethical Development
An individual’s conscience can mature over time, becoming more reliable as experiences and moral reflections deepen. The growing environmental consciousness among people illustrates this development.
Limitations of Relying Solely on Conscience
Subjectivity
Conscience is inherently subjective, influenced by personal beliefs and biases, leading to inconsistent ethical judgments. For instance, opinions on euthanasia vary widely based on individual moral beliefs.
Lack of Clarity
In complex situations, conscience may offer unclear guidance, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic when vaccine protocols were challenged.
Cultural Variability
Conscience varies across cultures, making it an unreliable universal standard. Differing views on live-in relationships exemplify this cultural disparity.
Vulnerability to Manipulation
Conscience can be manipulated, especially under external pressure. Groupthink often leads individuals to suppress personal moral judgments to conform to unethical group actions.
Legal and Social Consequences
Ignoring legal norms in favor of personal conscience can result in legal repercussions or social backlash, as evidenced by instances of mob lynching.
Conclusion
To navigate ethical decision-making effectively, individuals should consider both conscience and legal standards. This balanced approach, as advocated by leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, aligns personal morality with societal norms, fostering a just and responsible society.