Model Answer

Introduction

Moral intuition and moral reasoning are crucial cognitive processes that shape our moral judgments. While moral intuition serves as an immediate, emotion-driven response, moral reasoning involves a deliberate, rational analysis before reaching a moral decision. For instance, in a distressing situation, moral intuition may prompt immediate assistance, while moral reasoning assesses potential risks and benefits before deciding on the appropriate action.

Difference between Moral Intuition and Moral Reasoning

Examples

• Moral Intuition:
  1. An instant feeling of disapproval upon witnessing someone steal, reflecting an immediate emotional response rather than a thoughtful evaluation.
  2. A spontaneous urge to donate to a charitable cause after hearing about a natural disaster, prompted by empathy and instinct.
• Moral Reasoning:
  1. Critically evaluating the implications of a policy on various stakeholders, making decisions based on principles of justice and fairness.
  2. Deliberating on the allocation of limited medical resources during a pandemic, considering equity and the greater good.

Conclusion

Moral intuition and moral reasoning are distinct yet interconnected processes guiding moral decision-making. While moral intuition acts as the instinctive compass, moral reasoning provides the necessary calibration. Understanding these processes fosters a comprehensive approach to ethical dilemmas, enhancing well-rounded moral judgment.