How might the structure of subsidies in India be altered if Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) were to replace price subsidies? Talk about it. (200 words) [UPSC 2015]
TeamSupreme
Resources & Suggestions
Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts
Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र
मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...
On: February 22, 2025
Comments:
0
India’s Disaster Management
The article discusses the growing tensions between the Centre and states regarding disaster relief funding in India. It emphasizes the need for a transparent and equitable disaster management framework. Key Disaster Threats India Faces Increasing Frequency of Extreme Weather Events ...
Model Answer
Introduction
The introduction of Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) in India aims to streamline the flow of funds and information to beneficiaries, minimizing fraud in the subsidy delivery system. Replacing price subsidies with DBT could significantly transform the subsidy landscape in the country.
Changes in the Subsidy Scenario
1. Reduction in Leakage
2. Better Targeting of Benefits
3. Reduction in Fiscal Deficit
4. Empowering Beneficiaries
Conclusion
The transition from price subsidies to Direct Benefit Transfer aims not to eliminate subsidies but to enhance their effectiveness by ensuring that funds reach the intended beneficiaries. DBT has the potential to significantly reduce subsidy amounts, minimize leakage, and empower individuals, making it a transformative tool for India’s subsidy reform.
Impact of Replacing Price Subsidy with Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) on Subsidies in India
Introduction
The replacement of price subsidies with Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) represents a significant shift in subsidy delivery mechanisms in India. This change aims to enhance efficiency, reduce leakage, and improve targeting.
Improved Targeting and Efficiency
1. Reduced Leakage: DBT minimizes corruption and leakage by transferring benefits directly to beneficiaries’ bank accounts, bypassing intermediaries. For example, in the LPG subsidy scheme, DBT has reduced leakage significantly by ensuring that subsidies reach the actual consumers rather than being diverted.
2. Enhanced Transparency: DBT systems are more transparent, with transactions recorded electronically, allowing better tracking and accountability. This was evident in the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), which integrated DBT to streamline subsidy distribution and financial inclusion.
Cost Savings and Fiscal Impact
3. Reduced Administrative Costs: DBT reduces administrative overheads by cutting out middlemen and focusing resources directly on beneficiaries. For instance, the transfer of benefits under the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) via DBT has shown reduced administrative costs.
4. Fiscal Responsibility: By targeting subsidies more precisely, DBT helps in reducing the fiscal burden on the government. For example, the transition from fertilizer subsidies to DBT has allowed better control over subsidy expenditure and improved budget management.
Conclusion
In summary, the shift from price subsidies to DBT in India promises enhanced efficiency, transparency, and fiscal prudence. Recent examples demonstrate that DBT can effectively address challenges associated with traditional subsidy mechanisms, paving the way for a more equitable and sustainable subsidy system.