Ethical Analysis of the Superintendent of Police and Police Official

**1. Superintendent of Police’s Ethical Behavior
The instruction by the Superintendent of Police to “teach them a lesson” was ethically inappropriate and ambiguous. This directive, while aimed at maintaining order, was not clear and could be interpreted as an endorsement of excessive force. Ethical leadership requires clear, lawful, and non-violent instructions to manage public protests, ensuring that actions are within legal boundaries and uphold human rights.

**2. Police Official’s Ethical Behavior
The Police Official’s decision to physically assault a protestor based on the ambiguous instruction reflects poor judgment and a lack of ethical responsibility. Law enforcement officers are expected to exercise restraint and adhere to lawful conduct, even under ambiguous directives. Violence against protestors is unjustifiable and undermines the rule of law and public trust in the police.

**3. Recent Example
In 2023, during a farmers’ protest in Haryana, vague orders led to excessive force being used by the police, resulting in public outcry and legal scrutiny. This incident highlights the need for clear and ethical instructions to avoid misuse of power.

Conclusion:
Both the Superintendent of Police and the Police Official demonstrated ethical lapses. Clear, lawful, and non-violent instructions are essential for maintaining public order and ensuring ethical conduct in law enforcement.