Describe in depth the post-independence insurgent situation in northeastern India. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2022]
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Insurgency in North-Eastern India After Independence
1. Early Developments: After India gained independence, ethnic and political unrest in the North-East began to take shape due to factors such as historical grievances, ethnic tensions, and demands for autonomy. The Naga insurgency started in the 1950s, led by the Naga National Council (NNC), advocating for an independent Nagaland.
2. Formation of Insurgent Groups: Over time, various insurgent groups emerged across the region, each with specific demands. For instance, the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA), formed in 1979, sought an independent Assam, driven by perceived economic exploitation and cultural marginalization. Similarly, the Mizo National Front (MNF), initially seeking autonomy, escalated to a demand for secession, leading to armed conflict in the 1960s.
3. Government Response and Peace Processes: The Indian government’s response included both military action and political negotiations. The Assam Accord of 1985 was a significant step towards addressing Assamese grievances and integrating ULFA members into the political process. The Mizo Peace Accord in 1986 granted the Mizo Hills autonomy under the Mizoram State.
4. Recent Trends: Insurgency in the North-East has evolved, with increased focus on peace and reconciliation. The Naga Peace Accord (2015), signed with the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN-IM), aimed at resolving long-standing issues, though challenges remain. The Bodo Accord (2020) has been a recent success, granting greater autonomy to the Bodo people in Assam.
5. Ongoing Challenges: Despite progress, challenges persist, such as ethnic clashes, extremist factions, and demands for further autonomy. The armed groups in Manipur and the Khasi and Jaintia Hills in Meghalaya continue to pose security concerns.
Conclusion: The state of insurgency in North-Eastern India reflects a complex interplay of historical, ethnic, and political factors. While significant progress has been made through peace accords and political integration, the region continues to face challenges that require ongoing dialogue and development efforts.