India’s foreign policy has often been characterized by a principle of non-alignment and strategic autonomy, which means it does not align itself with any major power blocs. This approach is somewhat similar to Switzerland’s long-standing policy of neutrality. However, equating India with Switzerland in terms of neutrality is a bit of a stretch, as there are significant differences in both countries’ geopolitical contexts, history, and approaches to neutrality.

Similarities:
Non-Alignment and Strategic Autonomy: India has a history of maintaining an independent foreign policy, particularly during the Cold War through the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). This approach allowed India to avoid becoming overly aligned with either the Soviet Union or the United States.

Balancing Relationships: India continues to engage with multiple global powers, maintaining good relations with countries that might be adversaries, such as the United States and Russia, or India and China. This reflects a strategic balancing act, somewhat reminiscent of Switzerland’s neutrality.

Differences:
Geopolitical Context: Switzerland’s neutrality is deeply rooted in its history, geography, and the international treaties that have formalized its neutral status. India, on the other hand, is a major regional power in South Asia with significant security concerns, including its relationships with neighboring countries like Pakistan and China. India’s approach is more about strategic autonomy than strict neutrality.

Military and Defense: India is one of the world’s largest military powers and an active participant in various regional and international security alliances, such as the Quad (with the US, Japan, and Australia). This contrasts sharply with Switzerland, which has a small military force and avoids participation in military alliances.

Economic and Global Influence: India’s growing economic power and its active role in international organizations like the G20 and BRICS reflect its ambitions as a global leader. Switzerland, while economically influential, is more focused on financial services and diplomacy, with less emphasis on military or geopolitical power.

Conclusion:
While India shares some characteristics with Switzerland in terms of maintaining strategic independence, it is not accurate to say that India is becoming the “next Switzerland” based on neutrality. India’s foreign policy is more complex and multifaceted, reflecting its unique geopolitical situation and ambitions on the global stage. Rather than strict neutrality, India’s approach is best described as strategic autonomy, allowing it to navigate a complex international environment while preserving its national interests.