How would you defend the belief that the Gupta numismatic art’s superiority is completely undetectable in later periods? (150 words) [UPSC 2017]
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Gupta numismatic art, renowned for its high level of craftsmanship and artistic excellence, represents a peak in Indian coinage that is not fully replicated in later periods. Gupta coins are celebrated for their intricate designs, fine detailing, and artistic quality, reflecting a sophisticated understanding of aesthetics and metallurgy. The obverse typically features the king in a graceful pose, while the reverse showcases elaborate symbols and inscriptions.
In later times, while coinage continued to be produced, it often lacked the same level of refinement. Post-Gupta numismatic art saw a decline in artistic detail and sophistication due to various factors, including political instability, regional fragmentation, and changes in economic priorities. The decline in the central authority and standardization that characterized the Gupta period led to a less uniform and less artistically advanced numismatic tradition in subsequent eras.