The linguistic reorganization of states in India had a significant impact on national integration and cohesion. Here’s an assessment of the impact:

Positive Impact:

1. Language as a Unifying Factor: The linguistic reorganization of states helped to promote language as a unifying factor, as people from different regions and communities began to identify with their regional languages and cultures.
2. Regional Identity: The reorganization of states helped to promote regional identity, as people from different regions began to take pride in their unique cultural, linguistic, and historical heritage.
3. Reduced Linguistic Tensions: The creation of states along linguistic lines helped to reduce linguistic tensions between different regions, as people were more likely to interact with those who spoke the same language.
4. Increased Regional Autonomy: The reorganization of states provided greater autonomy to regions, allowing them to govern themselves more effectively and make decisions that reflected their unique needs and priorities.

Negative Impact:

1. Separation of Communities: The reorganization of states led to the separation of communities, as people from different regions were often divided into separate states based on their language and culture.
2. Ethnic and Nationalist Tensions: The reorganization of states also led to the emergence of ethnic and nationalist tensions, as some groups felt that they were being marginalized or excluded from power.
3. Border Disputes: The creation of new states along linguistic lines led to border disputes between neighboring states, which often required negotiations and agreements to resolve.
4. Increased Regionalism: The reorganization of states also led to an increase in regionalism, as some regions began to focus more on their local interests and less on the national interest.

Mixed Impact:

1. National Integration: The reorganization of states had both positive and negative impacts on national integration. While it helped to promote regional identity and reduce linguistic tensions, it also led to the separation of communities and the emergence of ethnic and nationalist tensions.
2. Regional Autonomy: The reorganization of states provided greater autonomy to regions, but it also created challenges for the national government in terms of coordinating policies and services across different regions.
3. Economic Inequality: The reorganization of states also led to economic inequality, as some regions became more prosperous than others due to differences in infrastructure, education, and employment opportunities.