Role of External State and Non-State Actors in Radicalization and Measures to Counter the Threat

Introduction

Radicalization of certain sections of the Indian population has been influenced by both external state and non-state actors. These actors exploit various means to incite extremism and unrest. This evaluation explores the role of these actors in radicalization and suggests measures to counteract this threat effectively.

1. Role of External State Actors

a. Support for Militant Groups

Funding and Training: External state actors, notably Pakistan, have been involved in supporting militant groups that target India. The Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), responsible for high-profile attacks like the Pulwama attack in February 2019, is reportedly backed by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Such support includes funding, training, and logistical assistance.
State Sponsorship of Terrorism: State actors like Pakistan have been accused of providing sanctuary and support to groups involved in terrorism against India. This external backing not only facilitates the operational capabilities of these groups but also aids in the radicalization process by providing ideological and material resources.
b. Diplomatic and Political Support

International Forums: States with interests opposing Indian policies sometimes use international forums to justify or minimize the impact of radicalization activities. For example, attempts to internationalize the Kashmir issue have seen external actors like Pakistan gain diplomatic support, which indirectly aids the radicalization efforts within Kashmir and other regions.
2. Role of Non-State Actors

a. Terrorist Organizations

Recruitment and Radicalization: Non-state actors, particularly terrorist organizations like ISIS, use online platforms and social media to recruit and radicalize individuals in India. ISIS’s propaganda efforts have targeted disaffected youth in various Indian states, leading to cases like the Kerala Youth joining ISIS.
Local Affiliates: Groups such as the Indian Mujahideen and SIMI (Students Islamic Movement of India) have local networks that engage in radicalizing young individuals, often exploiting local grievances and socio-economic issues.
b. Extremist Groups and Ideologies

Exploitation of Social Media: Non-state actors use social media to spread extremist ideologies and recruit followers. Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Telegram are used to disseminate radical content and organize activities. For instance, the spread of communal and radical content has been noted in recent Delhi riots of 2020, where extremist elements utilized social media to incite violence.
Community and Sectarian Divisions: Non-state actors exploit existing communal and sectarian divisions to radicalize individuals. The Bajrang Dal and similar groups have been involved in promoting radicalized views under the guise of religious and cultural revivalism, influencing some sections of the population towards radical ideologies.
3. Measures Required to Counter the Threat

a. Strengthening Internal Security and Intelligence

Enhanced Surveillance and Monitoring: Improved surveillance and monitoring of online activities can help detect and prevent radicalization. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) and Intelligence Bureau (IB) play crucial roles in tracking and intercepting radical activities.
Intelligence Sharing: Greater coordination and intelligence sharing among central and state agencies are essential to counteract both external and internal radicalization threats. The Multi-Agency Centre (MAC) serves as a platform for such coordination.
b. Counter-Radicalization Programs

Community Engagement: Engaging with communities to address grievances and counter extremist ideologies is critical. Initiatives like the Sadhbhavna Mission aim to promote communal harmony and integrate marginalized communities into mainstream society.
Educational and Vocational Training: Providing education and vocational training can help address the socio-economic factors contributing to radicalization. Programs aimed at youth empowerment and skill development can mitigate the appeal of extremist ideologies.
c. Legislative and Policy Measures

Strict Enforcement of Laws: Enforcing laws like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) to tackle terrorism financing and radicalization activities is crucial. These laws help in disrupting the financial and operational networks of extremist groups.
Counter-Terrorism Strategies: Implementing comprehensive counter-terrorism strategies, including preventive measures and quick-response mechanisms, is vital. The National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC), when fully operational, will enhance India’s capability to tackle terrorism and radicalization effectively.
d. International Cooperation

Global Counter-Terrorism Initiatives: Strengthening international cooperation to counter-terrorism and radicalization is essential. Collaboration with countries like the US, EU, and regional partners in counter-terrorism efforts helps in addressing transnational threats.
Engagement with Tech Companies: Working with tech companies to counteract the use of social media for spreading extremist content is necessary. Initiatives like the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT) aim to combat online radicalization.
Conclusion

External state and non-state actors significantly contribute to the radicalization of certain sections of the Indian population through various methods, including support for militant groups, online propaganda, and exploitation of social divisions. Addressing this threat requires a multifaceted approach, including strengthening internal security, enhancing community engagement, implementing robust legislative measures, and fostering international cooperation. A comprehensive strategy will be crucial in mitigating the impact of radicalization and ensuring national security.