Strategies Adopted by External State and Non-State Actors to Exploit Religious and Ethnic Fault Lines in India and Measures to Promote Social Cohesion

Introduction

India’s diverse religious and ethnic landscape has often been targeted by external state and non-state actors seeking to exploit social divisions for various strategic and ideological objectives. These strategies have implications for national security and social stability. This evaluation examines the methods used by these actors to exploit religious and ethnic fault lines and discusses measures required to promote social cohesion.

1. Strategies by External State Actors

a. State-Sponsored Propaganda and Support

Pakistan’s Support for Separatist Movements: Pakistan has been known to exploit religious fault lines in India, particularly in Kashmir. The support for groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), which promote anti-India sentiments and seek to destabilize the region, illustrates this strategy. The Pulwama attack of 2019, perpetrated by a JeM operative, was a direct result of such external interference.
Diplomatic Pressure and Internationalization: Pakistan has sought to internationalize the Kashmir issue, leveraging global platforms to highlight alleged human rights abuses and gain international support. This strategy aims to exacerbate internal divisions within India and pressure the Indian government.
b. Manipulation of Ethnic and Religious Tensions

China’s Role in North-Eastern Insurgencies: China has been accused of providing indirect support to insurgent groups in India’s Northeast, such as the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN). This support can exacerbate ethnic tensions and create instability in border regions, impacting national security.
2. Strategies by Non-State Actors

a. Radicalization and Recruitment

ISIS and Online Radicalization: Non-state actors like ISIS have exploited religious fault lines by using online platforms to recruit and radicalize individuals. ISIS’s propaganda has targeted disaffected Muslim youth in various parts of India, including Kerala, leading to several cases of individuals joining extremist groups.
Local Extremist Groups: Groups like the Bajrang Dal and Saffron Brigade have been involved in promoting radical Hindu ideologies and inciting violence against minority communities, contributing to communal tensions.
b. Social Media and Misinformation

Spread of Misinformation: Non-state actors use social media to spread misinformation and inflammatory content, exacerbating existing religious and ethnic tensions. The Delhi riots of 2020 saw the widespread use of social media to spread false information and incite violence between communities.
Manipulation of Community Grievances: Extremist groups and individuals often exploit genuine community grievances to stoke communal passions and deepen divisions. For example, incidents of mob lynching and communal violence have been sometimes fueled by false narratives circulated online.
3. Measures to Promote Social Cohesion

a. Strengthening Legal and Institutional Frameworks

Anti-Hate Speech Laws: Enforcing laws against hate speech and communal incitement is essential. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) and Cyber Crime Cells need to be empowered to tackle online hate speech and misinformation effectively.
Enhanced Law Enforcement: Strengthening law enforcement agencies to prevent and respond to incidents of communal violence can help maintain order and protect vulnerable communities.
b. Promoting Interfaith and Inter-Ethnic Dialogue

Community Engagement Initiatives: Initiatives such as the Gurgaon Dialogue and Aman Biradari work towards fostering dialogue and understanding between different communities. These programs encourage mutual respect and collaboration, reducing the impact of external and internal provocations.
Educational Programs: Integrating education on diversity, tolerance, and conflict resolution into school curricula can help foster a culture of inclusivity from a young age. Programs like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) can be used to enhance community projects that promote social harmony.
c. Enhancing Intelligence and Security Measures

Improving Intelligence Gathering: Enhancing intelligence capabilities to detect and prevent attempts by external and non-state actors to exploit communal tensions is crucial. The Multi-Agency Centre (MAC) facilitates better coordination and sharing of intelligence among different security agencies.
Community Policing: Implementing community policing strategies to build trust between law enforcement agencies and local communities can improve cooperation in preventing and addressing communal violence.
d. Leveraging Technology and Media

Countering Misinformation: Developing technology-driven solutions to detect and counter misinformation on social media platforms is essential. Collaborating with tech companies to monitor and control the spread of false information can mitigate its impact.
Promoting Positive Narratives: Media campaigns that promote positive narratives of unity and diversity can help counteract the divisive content propagated by external and non-state actors. The #UnityInDiversity campaign is an example of such efforts to foster national cohesion.
e. Economic and Social Development

Addressing Socio-Economic Disparities: Investing in socio-economic development in regions affected by communal and ethnic tensions can help address underlying grievances. Programs like Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) and Skill Development Initiatives aim to improve living standards and reduce socio-economic disparities.
Employment Opportunities: Creating employment opportunities and economic growth in marginalized communities can help reduce the appeal of extremist ideologies and foster a sense of inclusion.
Conclusion

External state and non-state actors employ various strategies to exploit religious and ethnic fault lines within India, impacting national security and social stability. Addressing these threats requires a multi-faceted approach that includes strengthening legal and institutional frameworks, promoting interfaith dialogue, enhancing intelligence and security measures, leveraging technology, and focusing on socio-economic development. By implementing these measures, India can foster social cohesion and mitigate the influence of divisive actors.