What are the potential consequences of the erosion of the presumption of innocence principle in the criminal justice system in India?
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The erosion of the presumption of innocence in India’s criminal justice system can have serious consequences. This fundamental principle, which asserts that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, is crucial for ensuring fair trials and protecting individual rights.
Without this presumption, individuals may face undue prejudice and bias. This can lead to a range of issues, including wrongful convictions, where innocent people are punished or stigmatized. The pressure on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt may be undermined, potentially resulting in a lower standard of proof and compromising the integrity of legal proceedings.
Additionally, the erosion of this principle can erode public trust in the criminal justice system. If the system is perceived as biased or unfair, it can lead to increased skepticism about its efficacy and legitimacy. This could also foster a climate of fear and injustice, where individuals are less likely to come forward with complaints or evidence.
Overall, maintaining the presumption of innocence is essential for ensuring justice, upholding human rights, and preserving the credibility of the legal system.