Should autonomous vehicles be programmed to make decisions that prioritize the lives of their passengers over pedestrians in unavoidable accident scenarios?
Adrika MajilliyaBegginer
Resources & Suggestions
Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles
On: March 8, 2025
Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (8 March 2025)
Examine the key issues that obstruct the development of port infrastructure in India and outline the recent measures taken by the government to address these challenges. (Answer in 200 words) भारत में बंदरगाह अवसंरचना के विकास में आने वाली विभिन्न ...
On: March 7, 2025
Comments:
0
मानव-वन्यजीव संघर्ष का प्रबंधन
प्रधानमंत्री की घोषणा: मानव-वन्यजीव संघर्ष प्रबंधन के लिए एक समर्पित केंद्र की स्थापना। चुनौतियाँ: जनसंख्या वृद्धि और संसाधनों की प्रतिस्पर्धा। वन्यजीव संरक्षण का महत्व पारिस्थितिक संतुलन और जलवायु अनुकूलन: वन्यजीव पारिस्थितिकी तंत्र को बनाए रखने और जलवायु पैटर्न को विनियमित ...
On: March 7, 2025
Comments:
0
Safeguarding Wildlife, Securing Harmony”
Context: Based on the editorial “Living with animals – the challenges and the solution” published in The Indian Express. Announcement: PM announced a center for managing human-wildlife conflict. (Press Information Bureau (PIB) release or official government announcement.) Importance of Wildlife ...
Programmers should not program autonomous vehicles to prioritize the lives of their passengers over other pedestrians in inevitable accident situations. Why-
-Ethical Concerns: Prioritizing passengers is morally wrong. It is creating a system in which some lives are devalued compared to others, which is a terrible and unjust concept.
-Societal Impact: Such a system would undermine public trust in autonomous vehicles. People would not want to use them if they knew they might be sacrificed in an accident. This could severely hinder the development and adoption of this potentially life-saving technology.
-Legal Ramifications: Programming vehicles to prioritize passengers could have severe legal consequences for manufacturers and developers. It could lead to lawsuits and potentially criminal charges.
-Alternative Solutions: In the absence of passenger safety as the guiding principle, self-driving cars would be programmed to:
1. Reduce damage as much as possible.
2. Avoid collisions through state-of-the-art sensors and predictive models.
-In the event that an accident cannot be avoided, the car would attempt to minimize damage as much as it can, independent of the persons’ identity.
The goal is to make totally safe, self-sufficient automobiles for everyone, not just passengers.
Programmers should not program autonomous vehicles to prioritize the lives of their passengers over other pedestrians in inevitable accident situations. Here’s why:
-Ethical Concerns: Prioritizing passengers is morally wrong. It is creating a system in which some lives are devalued compared to others, which is a terrible and unjust concept.
-Societal Impact: Such a system would undermine public trust in autonomous vehicles. People would not want to use them if they knew they might be sacrificed in an accident. This could severely hinder the development and adoption of this potentially life-saving technology.
-Legal Ramifications: Programming vehicles to prioritize passengers could have severe legal consequences for manufacturers and developers. It could lead to lawsuits and potentially criminal charges.
-Alternative Solutions: In the absence of passenger safety as the guiding principle, self-driving cars would be programmed to:
1. Reduce damage as much as possible.
2. Avoid collisions through state-of-the-art sensors and predictive models.
-In the event that an accident cannot be avoided, the car would attempt to minimize damage as much as it can, independent of the persons’ identity.
The goal is to make totally safe, self-sufficient automobiles for everyone, not just passengers.