Despite being implemented with great optimism, India’s post-independence land reform initiatives were largely ineffective. Provide a critical analysis. (150 words)
Rajeshwari MeenaBegginer
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Despite being implemented with great optimism, India’s post-independence land reform initiatives were largely ineffective. Provide a critical analysis. (150 words)
At the time of independence, India inherited a semi-feudal agrarian structure. The farmers did not have ownership of land and ownership was concentrated in the hands of few landlords and intermediaries. Additionally, the land was fragmented. This resulted in minuscule income for farmers and reduced the scope for further investment in agriculture. To overcome these structural challenges, land reforms were introduced post-independence.
They had the following components:
Land reforms were significant steps as they abolished the exploitative land tenure systems, distributed the surplus land among the landless and the weaker sections of the society, provided security of tenure, etc. Though the above reforms were steps in the right direction, they were not able to create much difference due to the following:
Thus, the pressure on land continues to rise. According to the latest Agriculture Census, the average holding has come down to 1.08 hectares (2015-16) from 2.28 hectares (1970-71). This has forced the farmers to take up alternative occupations, such as wage labour and animal husbandry. There continue to remain many structural challenges even after the reforms, thus, remedial measures should be taken in this regard.
Before colonialisation, India was an Agranian Economy which means that agriculture was the main source of livelihood for most of the people of India. But after Britishers captured India, they exploited natural as well as the human resources for the glory of their own country.
After the British rule, our agriculture sector was totally destroyed. There was low productivity, disguised unemployment, subsistence farming, outdated technology and what not.
To promote the growth in the agriculture sector, various land reforms were introduced during 1950-90 (post independent India) which unfotunately failed to make much difference in this sector.
LAND REFORMS:
Land reforms primarily referred to chnage in the ownerships of landholdings. This was a need in India where majority of its population was dependent on agriculture and to bring equity in agriculture. Some of these land reforms were:
1. LAND CEILING-
BUT THIS LEGISLATION FAILED as its implementation was delayed which the big farmers took benefit of. It gave them time to register the land in the name of their close relatives and were able to escape from this legislation.
2. ABOILATION OF INTERMEDIARIES
This legislation was also a fail as zamindars found some loop holes in this legislation. They evicted the tenants from their lands and claim that they were the self cultivators. And some farmers who got the ownership of the land did not benefit from the land reform.
The land reforms were successful in Kerala and West Bengal because the Government of these states were committed to the policy of Land Reforms but other states did not have the same level of commitment and inequality in the land Holdings continued.Land reforms in India, launched post-independence, aimed to dismantle feudal landholding systems and ensure equitable land distribution. Despite these goals, their impact was limited.
Economic Aspects
Social Aspects
Historical Context
Political Factors
Conclusion
While land reforms had noble aims, their success was uneven due to historical entrenchment, regional disparities, and political resistance. These factors collectively hindered the transformative potential of the reforms, resulting in limited and varied outcomes across India.