Quotas have been a subject of both support and criticism in the quest for gender equality.

Proponents argue that quotas are a necessary tool to break down systemic barriers and provide disadvantaged women with opportunities that would otherwise be denied. They can increase women’s representation in leadership positions, leading to better decision-making and policies that address women’s needs.

Critics contend that quotas can undermine meritocracy and lead to tokenism, where women are appointed based on their gender rather than qualifications. They argue that focusing on individual merit and creating a level playing field is a more effective long-term solution.

Quota effectiveness is likely contingent on a number of elements, such as the particular context in which they are implemented, how they are carried out, and whether or not they are combined with other supportive measures. While they might not be a perfect solution, quotas have undeniably contributed to increasing women’s participation in various fields.