Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Definition of Development and Welfare Schemes: Briefly explain what these schemes are and their intended purpose of uplifting vulnerable populations. Thesis Statement: Present your position on whether these schemes are discriminatory, acknowledging both sides of the argument. 2. ...
Model Answer Introduction In India, various commissions such as the National Commission for Women, Scheduled Castes, and Scheduled Tribes are established to address the needs of vulnerable groups. However, the multiplicity of these commissions often leads to overlapping jurisdictions and duplicatedRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
In India, various commissions such as the National Commission for Women, Scheduled Castes, and Scheduled Tribes are established to address the needs of vulnerable groups. However, the multiplicity of these commissions often leads to overlapping jurisdictions and duplicated functions, raising the question of whether merging them into a single umbrella Human Rights Commission would be a more efficient approach.
Arguments in Favor of Merging Commissions
- Streamlined Functioning: Combining these commissions could lead to streamlined operations, reducing complexity and duplication of tasks. A unified body would simplify processes and enhance efficiency in addressing grievances.
- Cost-effectiveness: Merging commissions can result in significant cost savings by minimizing administrative overhead and optimizing resource utilization. This would allow for better allocation of funds towards initiatives that directly benefit vulnerable groups.
- Holistic Approach: An umbrella Human Rights Commission would be better equipped to tackle the interconnected nature of human rights issues in India. It could address overlapping concerns related to caste, gender, and minority rights more effectively.
- Enhanced Visibility: A single commission could have greater visibility and influence, making it easier for vulnerable sections to access the support and services they need. This could lead to improved awareness and advocacy for their rights.
For instance, South Africa’s Human Rights Commission serves as an umbrella organization that oversees the rights of all citizens, including vulnerable groups, demonstrating the potential benefits of such a structure.
Arguments Against Merging Commissions
- Loss of Specialization: Specialized commissions like the National Commission for Women have successfully addressed gender-specific issues. Merging them may dilute their focus and compromise their effectiveness in advocating for women’s rights.
- Bureaucratization: A large, centralized commission may become overly bureaucratic, hindering its ability to respond swiftly to the needs of vulnerable groups. This could lead to delays in addressing critical issues.
- Limited Focus: A single commission may struggle to provide adequate attention to the diverse needs of each vulnerable section, potentially leading to some groups being underrepresented or overlooked.
- Inadequate Representation: An umbrella commission may not accommodate the same level of representation as multiple specialized bodies, which could diminish the voices of marginalized communities.
Conclusion
While merging commissions may enhance efficiency and visibility, it risks diluting the specialized focus and diverse representation necessary to address the unique challenges faced by each vulnerable group. A balanced approach could involve retaining specialized commissions while fostering enhanced coordination and cooperation within a broader human rights framework, ensuring that the specific needs of each vulnerable section are met.
See less
Model Answer Introduction Development and welfare schemes play a crucial role in uplifting marginalized sections of society, aiming for socio-economic development. While these initiatives are essential for addressing disparities, they can be perceived as discriminatory. This duality requires a nuancRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Development and welfare schemes play a crucial role in uplifting marginalized sections of society, aiming for socio-economic development. While these initiatives are essential for addressing disparities, they can be perceived as discriminatory. This duality requires a nuanced discussion.
Arguments Supporting Discrimination
Focused Approach
Critics argue that schemes like reservation policies in education and government jobs create a perception of unfairness among non-reserved categories. This can dilute meritocracy, leading some to view these measures as discriminatory rather than equitable.
Resource Allocation
Welfare initiatives such as MGNREGA primarily target rural populations, potentially neglecting urban poor communities. This focus can foster feelings of exclusion among those in urban areas who also face significant economic challenges (The Hindu).
Potential for Misuse
Programs like the Public Distribution System (PDS), intended to provide essential commodities to the economically weaker, often face corruption and diversion of resources, undermining their effectiveness.
Creation of Dependency
Schemes providing free utilities to farmers can inadvertently create a dependency culture, discouraging self-reliance and sustainable practices.
Geographical Disparities
Certain schemes, such as the Prime Minister’s Development Initiative for North East Region (PM-DevINE), may lead to perceptions of discrimination in regions that do not receive similar attention.
Counter-Arguments: Necessity for Targeted Approaches
Social Justice
Welfare schemes like Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao aim to address gender imbalances and promote the education of girls, working towards a more equitable society.
Economic Equity
Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana has fostered financial inclusion, bringing many into the formal banking sector and promoting economic equity.
Health and Wellbeing
Ayushman Bharat provides substantial health coverage to the poor, ensuring access to necessary healthcare services.
Educational Equity
The Mid Day Meal Scheme not only promotes education among disadvantaged children but also addresses malnutrition.
Infrastructure Development
Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana connects rural areas with urban centers, facilitating access to economic opportunities.
Tribal Empowerment
VAN DHAN YOJANA supports the tribal economy by providing market avenues for forest products.
Conclusion
While criticisms of development and welfare schemes as being discriminatory hold merit, it is essential to recognize their role in promoting inclusivity and equity. A balanced approach that addresses these concerns while continuing to support targeted interventions is crucial for fostering a more equitable society. Effective implementation and monitoring can help ensure these schemes serve their intended purpose without perpetuating discrimination.
See less