Home/upsc: russian revolution
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
Analyze the Bolshevik's policies of War Communism and the subsequent New Economic Policy (NEP) and their consequences.
War Communism and the New Economic Policy: A Comparative Analysis: The Bolshevik regime followed two different kinds of economic policies- War Communism and New Economic Policy (NEP)- that they introduced to fight against the Russian Civil War and later, the economic debacle that emerged afterward.Read more
War Communism and the New Economic Policy: A Comparative Analysis:
The Bolshevik regime followed two different kinds of economic policies- War Communism and New Economic Policy (NEP)- that they introduced to fight against the Russian Civil War and later, the economic debacle that emerged afterward.
War Communism (1918-1921)
The extreme centralisation policy and complete control by the state characterised the War Communism. These included:
Nationalisation of industry: All big-scale industries were nationalized, and workers were put into labor armies.
Forced requisition of grain: The government seized grain from the peasantry for feeding Red Army and city workers.
Rationing: Foodstuffs and other vital commodities were rationed for proper distribution.
Ban on private trade: Private trade was banned and replaced by barter and markets controlled by the state.
Effects of War Communism:
-Economic breakdown: The policy brought about total economic ruin as the industrial production drastically fell and the agricultural production sharply declined.
-Famine and starvation: The policy caused widespread famine due to grain requisition.
-Social turmoil: The policy also alienated the peasantry who did not accept the seizure of their grain. It brought about much social unrest in many regions.
The New Economic Policy (NEP) (1921-1928)
To alleviate the failure of War Communism, the Bolsheviks brought forward the New Economic Policy, which came into effect from 1921 to 1928. The main features of this policy were:
-Market reforms: NEP permitted the resumption of private trade and small-scale industry.
-Taxation in kind: Forced requisition of grain was substituted with a fixed tax in kind that left peasants free to sell any surplus on the market.
-Concessions to foreign capital: The government offered concessions to foreign companies to invest in Russian industries.
-Mixed economy: The NEP was a mixture of a market economy with state control in sectors such as heavy industry, banking, and transportation.
Aftermaths of the NEP:
-Economic recovery: The NEP brought a major recovery to the Russian economy with the growth of agricultural and industrial production.
-Improved living standards: The policy enhanced the living standards of the population, especially in urban centers.
-Strengthening of the Bolshevik regime: Economic recovery helped stabilize the regime, and more importantly, the living conditions improved.
Social tensions between the wealthy peasants, known as kulaks, and less fortunate peasants, and between citizens in the cities and rural areas created social tensions because of NEP.
In conclusion, both War Communism and the New Economic Policy had severe effects on Russia. War Communism, although a necessity to keep the Bolshevik regime alive in the Civil War, was doomed to economic collapse and social uprisings. The NEP stabilized the economy and improved living standards but created new social tensions and challenges for future development of the Soviet Union.
See lessThe New Economic Policy 1921 of Lenin had influenced the policies adopted by India soon after independence. Evaluate. (150 words) [UPSC 2014]
Influence of Lenin’s New Economic Policy (1921) on Post-Independence Indian Policies Overview of the New Economic Policy (NEP) 1921 Lenin's New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921 was a strategic shift from war communism towards a mixed economy, combining state control with limited market mechanisms to reRead more
Influence of Lenin’s New Economic Policy (1921) on Post-Independence Indian Policies
Overview of the New Economic Policy (NEP) 1921
Lenin’s New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921 was a strategic shift from war communism towards a mixed economy, combining state control with limited market mechanisms to revive the Soviet economy. It allowed private ownership of small businesses and encouraged agricultural production, aiming to stabilize the economy and ensure a smoother transition to socialism.
Impact on India’s Post-Independence Policies
After India gained independence in 1947, the Indian government adopted several economic policies influenced by the NEP’s principles, albeit in a modified form:
Recent Examples
India’s economic liberalization policies of 1991 and subsequent reforms echo the NEP’s balance between state control and market dynamics, reflecting a pragmatic approach to economic management.
Conclusion
See lessLenin’s NEP influenced India’s economic policies by advocating a balanced approach between state intervention and market mechanisms, shaping India’s early post-independence economic strategies.
How did the establishment of the Soviet Union and the one-party Bolshevik state reshape the political and social landscape?
The establishment of the Soviet Union and the one-party Bolshevik state in 1922 had a profound impact on the political and social landscape of Russia and beyond. Here are some key ways in which the Soviet Union reshaped the political and social landscape: Centralization of Power: The Soviet Union waRead more
The establishment of the Soviet Union and the one-party Bolshevik state in 1922 had a profound impact on the political and social landscape of Russia and beyond. Here are some key ways in which the Soviet Union reshaped the political and social landscape:
Centralization of Power:
The Soviet Union was a highly centralized state, with the Communist Party (Bolsheviks) holding absolute power. This led to a concentration of decision-making authority in Moscow, with regional governments and institutions playing a subordinate role.
Suppression of Opposition:
The Soviet Union was marked by a severe suppression of opposition, including the persecution of political dissidents, intellectuals, and minorities. This created a culture of fear and silence, as people were reluctant to speak out against the government or express dissenting views.
Collectivization of Agriculture:
The Soviet Union implemented a series of collectivization policies, which aimed to consolidate small farms into large-scale collective farms. This led to widespread poverty, famine, and displacement of peasants, as well as the forced relocation of millions of people to urban areas.
Industrialization:
The Soviet Union invested heavily in industrialization, with a focus on heavy industry and manufacturing. This led to rapid economic growth, but also created social tensions and inequalities, as well as environmental degradation.
Social Reforms:
The Soviet Union introduced a range of social reforms, including universal education, healthcare, and social welfare programs. These reforms helped to reduce poverty and improve living standards, but also created new forms of social control and surveillance.
Cultural Revolution:
The Soviet Union launched a series of cultural revolutions, which aimed to create a new Soviet culture and identity. This included the suppression of traditional Russian culture, the promotion of socialist realist art and literature, and the creation of new cultural institutions.
Expansionism:
The Soviet Union engaged in a series of expansionist policies, including the annexation of neighboring territories, support for communist movements around the world, and involvement in international conflicts.
Cold War:
The Soviet Union’s expansionism and ideological rivalry with the West led to the outbreak of the Cold War, a decades-long period of political tension and competition between the two superpowers.
Impact on International Relations:
The Soviet Union’s rise to global prominence had a profound impact on international relations, creating a new bipolar world order and leading to the formation of alliances and blocs.
See lessExamine the power struggle between the Bolsheviks and other political factions during the Russian Civil War.
The Russian Civil War (1918-1922) was a complex and multifaceted conflict that involved various political factions, including the Bolsheviks, Mensheviks, Socialist Revolutionaries, and monarchist forces. The power struggle between these factions was a defining feature of the war, as each side soughtRead more
The Russian Civil War (1918-1922) was a complex and multifaceted conflict that involved various political factions, including the Bolsheviks, Mensheviks, Socialist Revolutionaries, and monarchist forces. The power struggle between these factions was a defining feature of the war, as each side sought to establish control over the newly formed Soviet state.
Bolsheviks:
The Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, were the dominant force in the Russian Revolution. They had seized power in October 1917 and established the Soviet government. The Bolsheviks believed that the revolution was a necessary step towards a socialist society and that they were the only party capable of leading the working class to victory.
Mensheviks:
The Mensheviks were a socialist party that had split from the Bolsheviks in 1912. They believed that the revolution was not yet ripe for socialism and that a more gradual approach was needed. The Mensheviks were opposed to the Bolsheviks’ seizure of power and instead advocated for a democratic government.
Socialist Revolutionaries:
The Socialist Revolutionaries (SRs) were a peasant-based party that had also split from the Bolsheviks. They believed that the revolution should be led by peasants and workers, rather than intellectuals like Lenin. The SRs were initially allies of the Bolsheviks but soon turned against them, fearing that their revolution would be hijacked by the Bolsheviks.
Monarchist Forces:
The monarchist forces, led by Tsar Nicholas II’s son, Alexei, and his brother, Mikhail, were opposed to the revolution and sought to restore the Romanov dynasty. These forces were largely made up of former Tsarist army officers and aristocrats.
Power Struggle:
The power struggle between these factions began shortly after the October Revolution. The Bolsheviks faced opposition from various quarters, including:
Evaluate the impact of World War I on the weakening of the Tsarist regime and the revolutionary movement.
World War I had a profound impact on the weakening of the Tsarist regime and the revolutionary movement in Russia. Here are some key ways in which the war contributed to the decline of the regime and the rise of the revolution: Economic Crisis: The war effort drained Russia's resources, leading to wRead more
World War I had a profound impact on the weakening of the Tsarist regime and the revolutionary movement in Russia. Here are some key ways in which the war contributed to the decline of the regime and the rise of the revolution:
Economic Crisis:
The war effort drained Russia’s resources, leading to widespread economic crisis, including food shortages, rationing, and inflation. This created widespread discontent among the population, particularly among the working class and peasants.
Human Losses:
Russia suffered heavily in the war, with over 1.7 million soldiers killed or wounded. The loss of so many young men had a profound impact on Russian society, leaving behind a generation of widows and orphans.
Faltering War Effort:
The Russian army’s performance on the battlefield was poor, and the war effort was plagued by corruption, inefficiency, and incompetence. This led to widespread disillusionment with the government’s ability to lead the country.
Nationalism and Patriotism:
As the war dragged on, nationalism and patriotism began to wane. The Russian people were tired of fighting for a cause they no longer believed in, and many began to question the motives of the government.
Government Incompetence:
The Tsarist government was widely seen as incompetent and ineffective, particularly in its handling of the war effort. The government’s inability to address the country’s economic and social problems further eroded its legitimacy.
Growing Opposition:
As the war continued, opposition to the government grew. The socialist parties, including the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, gained popularity among the working class and peasantry. The liberal parties, such as the Kadets, also gained support among the middle class.
Cultural and Social Changes:
The war accelerated cultural and social changes in Russia. The rise of women’s participation in the workforce, increased literacy rates, and changes in family dynamics all contributed to a more modernized society.
Decline of Traditional Values:
The war also contributed to a decline in traditional values such as loyalty to the Tsar and faith in the Orthodox Church. The experience of war had a profound impact on Russian society, leading to a loss of faith in institutions and a growing sense of disillusionment.
Mobilization for War:
The war effort led to widespread mobilization of men and resources. This mobilization created a sense of community and shared purpose among Russians, but it also created new social tensions and conflicts.
See lessDiscuss the role of Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik party in the overthrow of the Provisional Government.
Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Party played a crucial role in the overthrow of the Provisional Government in October 1917. Here's a detailed discussion of their role: Bolshevik Party's Pre-Revolutionary Position: Before the revolution, the Bolshevik Party was a small but growing force within the RRead more
Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Party played a crucial role in the overthrow of the Provisional Government in October 1917. Here’s a detailed discussion of their role:
Bolshevik Party’s Pre-Revolutionary Position:
Before the revolution, the Bolshevik Party was a small but growing force within the Russian Revolution. They had a significant following among the working class, particularly in Petrograd, where Lenin was based. The Bolsheviks were opposed to the Provisional Government, which they saw as a continuation of the Tsarist regime and a defender of the interests of the bourgeoisie.
Lenin’s Return to Russia:
In April 1917, Lenin returned to Russia from exile in Switzerland, where he had been living since his expulsion from Russia in 1906. His return marked a significant turning point in the Bolshevik Party’s fortunes, as he brought with him fresh ideas and a new level of enthusiasm and energy.
Bolshevik Agitation:
Lenin and the Bolsheviks launched a campaign of agitation and propaganda against the Provisional Government. They argued that the government was powerless to solve Russia’s economic and social problems and that only a socialist revolution could bring about meaningful change. They also emphasized the need for workers to take control of their own destiny and seize power from the bourgeoisie.
July Days:
In July 1917, the Bolsheviks launched a failed uprising known as the July Days, which was sparked by rumors of a German attack on Petrograd. The uprising was quickly crushed by government forces, but it marked an important turning point in the Bolsheviks’ strategy. Lenin realized that a more careful and deliberate approach was needed to build support for the revolution.
October Uprising:
In September 1917, Lenin returned to Petrograd, where he began to build support for a new uprising. He worked tirelessly to persuade his comrades and other left-wing groups to join forces with the Bolsheviks. On October 25, 1917 (November 7, according to the Gregorian calendar), the Bolsheviks launched their uprising, seizing key buildings and institutions in Petrograd.
Key Factors in Bolshevik Success:
Several factors contributed to the Bolsheviks’ success:
Analyze the socioeconomic and political factors that led to the outbreak of the Russian Revolution in 1917.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was a complex and multifaceted event that was influenced by a combination of socioeconomic and political factors. Here are some of the key factors that contributed to the outbreak of the revolution: Socioeconomic Factors: Economic Crisis: Russia had been experiencing aRead more
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was a complex and multifaceted event that was influenced by a combination of socioeconomic and political factors. Here are some of the key factors that contributed to the outbreak of the revolution:
Socioeconomic Factors:
Political Factors:
Key Events Leading to the Revolution:
Analyze the global significance and influence of the Russian Revolution on the development of communist and socialist movements worldwide.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 had a profound global significance, catalyzing the development of communist and socialist movements worldwide. It marked the first successful overthrow of a capitalist government by a proletarian revolution, inspiring leftist movements globally. **Influence on CommunisRead more
The Russian Revolution of 1917 had a profound global significance, catalyzing the development of communist and socialist movements worldwide. It marked the first successful overthrow of a capitalist government by a proletarian revolution, inspiring leftist movements globally.
**Influence on Communist Movements**:
– The establishment of the Soviet Union provided a model and ideological foundation for communist parties worldwide.
– The Comintern (Communist International) was established in 1919 to promote and support communist movements, leading to the formation of communist parties across Europe, Asia, and Latin America.
– The revolution’s success energized anti-colonial struggles, with leaders like Mao Zedong in China drawing inspiration from the Bolshevik model.
**Impact on Socialist Movements**:
– The Russian Revolution intensified the ideological divide within socialist movements, splitting them into reformist and revolutionary factions.
– Social democratic parties in Europe faced pressure to adopt more radical stances or risk losing support to emerging communist parties.
– The fear of similar revolutions prompted social reforms in Western countries to mitigate class tensions, contributing to the development of welfare states.
**Global Repercussions**:
– The revolution’s example led to uprisings and the establishment of communist regimes in countries like China, Cuba, and Vietnam.
– It shaped global geopolitics, contributing to the ideological and strategic rivalry of the Cold War era.
Overall, the Russian Revolution fundamentally reshaped the landscape of global politics, fostering the spread and adaptation of communist and socialist ideologies worldwide.
See lessExamine the nature and impact of the Great Purge and the consolidation of Stalin's totalitarian control.
Nature and Impact of the Great Purge and the Consolidation of Stalin's Totalitarian Control The Great Purge (or Great Terror) was a series of violent political campaigns initiated by Joseph Stalin in the late 1930s. This period marked a significant consolidation of Stalin's totalitarian control overRead more
Nature and Impact of the Great Purge and the Consolidation of Stalin’s Totalitarian Control
The Great Purge (or Great Terror) was a series of violent political campaigns initiated by Joseph Stalin in the late 1930s. This period marked a significant consolidation of Stalin’s totalitarian control over the Soviet Union, profoundly affecting the political, social, and economic fabric of the country.
1. The Nature of the Great Purge
The Great Purge, which spanned from 1936 to 1938, was characterized by a systematic and widespread campaign of political repression. The purge involved:
2. Impact of the Great Purge
The impact of the Great Purge was far-reaching, affecting various aspects of Soviet society:
3. Recent Examples and Analysis
Recent analyses and historical accounts provide deeper insights into the nature and impact of the Great Purge:
4. Conclusion
The Great Purge was a crucial episode in the consolidation of Stalin’s totalitarian regime. By employing widespread repression, Stalin succeeded in eliminating opposition and consolidating his control over the Soviet Union. The profound impact of the purges extended beyond political purges, affecting military effectiveness, social dynamics, and economic progress. Recent scholarly work and media portrayals continue to shed light on this dark period of Soviet history, providing valuable insights into the nature of totalitarian control and its consequences.
See lessEvaluate the impact of the collectivization of agriculture and the industrialization drive on the Soviet economy and society.
The collectivization of agriculture and the industrialization drive in the Soviet Union, initiated under Joseph Stalin in the late 1920s and 1930s, had profound impacts on the economy and society. **Collectivization**: - Aimed to consolidate individual farms into large, state-controlled collective fRead more
The collectivization of agriculture and the industrialization drive in the Soviet Union, initiated under Joseph Stalin in the late 1920s and 1930s, had profound impacts on the economy and society.
**Collectivization**:
– Aimed to consolidate individual farms into large, state-controlled collective farms (kolkhozes).
– Disrupted traditional rural life, leading to widespread resistance, severe repression, and the liquidation of kulaks (wealthier peasants).
– Resulted in a catastrophic famine (1932-1933), particularly in Ukraine, causing millions of deaths.
– Despite initial disruptions, it eventually increased grain procurement for the state, supporting industrialization.
**Industrialization**:
– Focused on rapid industrial growth through Five-Year Plans, prioritizing heavy industry, steel production, and infrastructure.
– Achieved remarkable increases in industrial output, transforming the Soviet Union into a major industrial power.
– Relied on forced labor, harsh working conditions, and strict government control, leading to significant human suffering and loss of life.
– Urbanization accelerated, and a new working class emerged, but living standards remained low due to resource allocation to industrial rather than consumer goods.
**Impact**:
See less– Economically, these policies laid the foundation for the Soviet Union’s later status as a superpower.
– Socially, they caused immense hardship, widespread repression, and a profound transformation of Soviet society, characterized by state control and loss of individual freedoms.