Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question
Home/upsc: revolt of 1857

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Tejas Rao
  • 3
Tejas RaoBegginer
Asked: July 9, 2024In:
  • 3

Talk about how the Doctrine of Lapse caused the native states’ preexisting power structures to collapse and how it served as a spark for the Revolt of 1857.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Arjun Sharma
    Arjun Sharma Begginer

    The Doctrine of Lapse was a controversial colonial policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie in 1848, which allowed the British East India Company to annex any princely state in India if the ruler died without a male heir or was deemed incompetent. By the use of the doctrine of lapse, the Company took oveRead more

    The Doctrine of Lapse was a controversial colonial policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie in 1848, which allowed the British East India Company to annex any princely state in India if the ruler died without a male heir or was deemed incompetent. By the use of the doctrine of lapse, the Company took over the princely states of Satara (1848), Jaitpur, Sambalpur (1849), Baghat (1850)This policy not only disrupted existing power hierarchies within native states but also acted as a catalyst for mass participation in the Revolt of 1857.

    Doctrine of Lapse Disrupted the Existing Power Hierarchies Within Native States in the following ways

    • Jhansi: When Rani Lakshmibai’s husband, Raja Gangadhar Rao, died without a male heir, the British annexed Jhansi under the Doctrine of Lapse. It highlights the extent to which the Doctrine disrupted traditional power structures.
    • Satara: Satara was the first state to fall under this policy, and its annexation set an alarming precedent. The act instilled a sense of deep mistrust and fear among other princely states, making them realize they were vulnerable to the same fate.
    • Nagpur: The annexation of Nagpur led to the dissolution of the Maratha Confederacy, effectively dislodging a significant power center in Central India. It sent a signal to other states that even powerful entities were not safe from British expansionism.
    • Sambalpur: The Doctrine dismissed local traditions, particularly the tradition of adoption. In places like Sambalpur, where adoption was prevalent, this caused immense social and political upheaval, leading to the destabilization of long-standing political structures.
    • Udaipur: The annexation of Udaipur fostered a perception that British policies aimed for the complete subjugation of native states. This further fragmented the existing power hierarchies, as many Rajput states began considering alliances against British aggression.
    • Loss of Aristocracy: The nobility and civil servants who lost their positions due to annexation became disenchanted with the British regime. Their disenfranchisement led to a vacuum of leadership within these states, further disturbing traditional hierarchies.
    • Property Confiscation: The Doctrine led to the widespread confiscation of property, including lands held by local nobility. This dismantled the economic backbone of many states, causing unrest among landowners and peasants alike.

    Ways in which the Doctrine of Lapse Acted as a Catalyst in Mobilizing Mass Participation in the Revolt of 1857

    • Rani Lakshmibai: The annexation of Jhansi left Rani Lakshmibai, with no choice but to defy British orders. Her struggle against British annexation became emblematic of resistance, inspiring both men and women to join the revolt, making her one of the key figures in the 1857 Uprising.
    • Military Involvement: Soldiers (sepoys) were often from the very states annexed under the Doctrine. For example Awadh was the nursery of Company’s army till the 1860s. Their personal grievances against the British made them active participants in the Revolt, spreading mutinies across various garrisons.
    • Peasants and Landlords: The annexation led to changes in land revenue systems and the dispossession of local landlords. This economic disenfranchisement ensured that the revolt was not limited to military ranks but included civilian participation.
    • Public Sentiment: The Doctrine came to symbolize the exploitative nature of British rule, stirring public sentiment. Even those who had not been directly affected joined the revolt, expanding its base.
    • General Discontentment: The very existence of this Doctrine created a sense of impending doom among other princely states, contributing to a wider sense of unrest and immediate support for the revolt when it broke out.
    • Hindu-Muslim Unity: The policy did not discriminate between Hindu or Muslim states, leading to a unique moment of religious unity against a common oppressor, which was instrumental in broadening the revolt’s scope.
    • Pan-Indian Identity: This Doctrine led to the establishment of a nascent sense of collective identity. People from diverse linguistic, religious, and regional backgrounds found a common cause to rally against, laying the groundwork for future struggles.

    The Doctrine of Lapse disrupted the existing power structures within the native states, leading to widespread discontent and disenfranchisement. The policy also fueled the fires of the Revolt of 1857, acting as a focal point that unified various classes and communities against British rule that eventually contributed to the end of the East India Company’s rule in India.

    See less
Uday Bhatia
  • 1
Uday BhatiaBegginer
Asked: July 9, 2024In:
  • 1

Even though the 1857 uprising was put down, it dealt a serious blow to the British government’s operations in India. The British government was given a new framework and underwent significant changes. Describe.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Prachi Yadav
    Prachi Yadav Begginer

    After the East India Company established British rule over the Indian territory, disappointment and anger started to thrive in the hearts and minds of the Indians. There were several reasons like the introduction of a permanent settlement system, widow remarriage act of 1856, subsidiary alliance andRead more

    After the East India Company established British rule over the Indian territory, disappointment and anger started to thrive in the hearts and minds of the Indians. There were several reasons like the introduction of a permanent settlement system, widow remarriage act of 1856, subsidiary alliance and the doctrine of lapse, overseas wars in Burma, and more.

    However, the main incident that caused the breakout of revolt of 1857 was the introduction of greased cartridges. It was made from the fats of pig and cow that violated Muslim and Hindu religion.

    The sepoys refused to use those cartridges and it initiated the revolt.

    The Course of the Great War of IndependenceTo understand the causes of the 1857 revolt, it is essential to understand the course of Mutiny that can be dated back to 1857, on 29th March. Mangal Panday rejected operating the cartridges and killed the deputy on this day. With him, 85 other enthusiasts at Meerut rejected the use of the same.

    However, the significance of the revolt of 1857 provided a charge of imprisonment on the soldiers, which the other soldiers strongly opposed. In 1857, on 10th May, the soldiers killed the officers and headed towards Delhi. They requested the Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah II to take back the throne and help them fight against the British.  The revolt of 1857 was widespread indeed but it failed to bring together the entire country. Southern India never participated in the mutiny. In fact, many rulers who first contributed to the war backed out when they saw the defeat of the sepoys.

    Failure of the revolt 1857

    The sepoy mutiny was more localized. Due to the lack of any central influence, it became easier for the British to suppress the revolts.

    No one was there to lead the sepoys and make them understand about the game plan. On the other hand, the British army was led by governors and expert military persons.One of the main reasons for the failure of the revolt of 1857 was the characters of the Bengal soldiers. They were hated everywhere and the uprisings were crushed down by the locals themselves.

    Even though they were a strong and united reason for the uprisings, the sepoys didn’t know whom to put in power if they were able to overthrow the British.

    The sepoys lacked unity and discipline unlike the British soldiers who were highly disciplined.

    See less
Kailash Nath
  • 1
Kailash NathBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 1

Examine how the media—both Indian and British—shaped the stories and portrayals of the Rebellion.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Hareem Khan
    Hareem Khan Begginer

    The media played a significant role in shaping the narratives and representations of the Indian Rebellion of 1857, also known as the Sepoy Mutiny. Both Indian and British media outlets contributed to the construction of the rebellion's narrative, often reflecting their own biases and agendas. BritisRead more

    The media played a significant role in shaping the narratives and representations of the Indian Rebellion of 1857, also known as the Sepoy Mutiny. Both Indian and British media outlets contributed to the construction of the rebellion’s narrative, often reflecting their own biases and agendas.

    British Media:

    1. Portrayal of the rebels as savage and barbaric: The British media, particularly The Times of London, portrayed the rebels as savage and barbaric, emphasizing their alleged cruelty and brutality. This portrayal was intended to justify the British military response and reinforce the notion of European superiority.
    2. Focus on the role of the Indian princes: The British media highlighted the involvement of Indian princes, such as the Rani of Jhansi, in the rebellion, framing them as traitors who had betrayed their loyalty to the British East India Company.
    3. Emphasis on British heroism and sacrifice: The media emphasized the bravery and sacrifice of British soldiers, portraying them as heroes who were fighting against overwhelming odds to maintain order and stability in India.

    Indian Media:

    1. Pro-rebellion and anti-British sentiments: Indian newspapers, such as The Bombay Gazette and The Calcutta Times, were largely pro-rebellion and anti-British. They framed the rebellion as a justified response to British oppression and exploitation.
    2. Focus on British atrocities: Indian newspapers highlighted British atrocities, such as the destruction of cities, massacres, and forced conversions. They portrayed these events as evidence of British brutality and cruelty.
    3. Emphasis on Indian identity and nationalism: Indian media outlets emphasized the importance of Indian identity and nationalism, framing the rebellion as a struggle for independence and self-determination.

    Comparing Indian and British Media:

    1. Polarized perspectives: The media in both countries presented polarized perspectives on the rebellion, with little middle ground or nuanced analysis.
    2. Different agendas: The Indian media was driven by a desire to challenge British colonial rule and promote national identity, while the British media sought to justify their military response and reinforce their dominance over India.
    3. Limited coverage: The media coverage of the rebellion was limited by geographic constraints and technological limitations. News traveled slowly across distances, and many reports were based on hearsay or second-hand information.

    Legacy of Media Coverage:

    1. Shaping public opinion: The media coverage of the rebellion played a significant role in shaping public opinion in both India and Britain.
    2. Perpetuating stereotypes: The stereotypes and biases perpetuated by the media have continued to influence popular perceptions of the rebellion to this day.
    3. Ongoing impact: The legacy of the media coverage can still be seen in contemporary debates about Indian independence and national identity.
    See less
Kailash Nath
  • 1
Kailash NathBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 1

Analyze the Revolt’s ideological and symbolic significance in the Indian historical narrative and its aftermath.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Hareem Khan
    Hareem Khan Begginer

    Symbolic and Ideological Significance: The Revolt of 1857 holds significant symbolic and ideological importance in the Indian historical narrative, representing: National Pride: The Revolt symbolizes the pride and dignity of the Indian people, as they resisted British rule and fought for their freedRead more

    Symbolic and Ideological Significance:

    The Revolt of 1857 holds significant symbolic and ideological importance in the Indian historical narrative, representing:

    1. National Pride: The Revolt symbolizes the pride and dignity of the Indian people, as they resisted British rule and fought for their freedom.
    2. Anti-Colonial Struggle: The Revolt represents the earliest and most significant anti-colonial struggle in India, setting the stage for future movements towards independence.
    3. Hindu-Muslim Unity: The Revolt saw a temporary alliance between Hindus and Muslims, highlighting the potential for unity and cooperation between different religious groups.
    4. Rebellion against Imperialism: The Revolt symbolizes the Indian people’s rebellion against British imperialism, demonstrating their willingness to challenge and resist foreign rule.

    Legacy:

    The Revolt of 1857 has left a lasting legacy in Indian history, shaping:

    1. Indian Nationalism: The Revolt laid the foundation for modern Indian nationalism, inspiring future generations to fight for independence.
    2. Indian Identity: The Revolt helped to create a sense of Indian identity, emphasizing the need for national unity and self-governance.
    3. Anti-Colonial Movement: The Revolt influenced the development of anti-colonial movements across India, including the Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922) and the Quit India Movement (1942).
    4. Nationalist Leaders: The Revolt inspired nationalist leaders like Gandhi, Nehru, and Bose to continue the fight for independence.

    Key Points:

    • Symbolic Significance: The Revolt of 1857 has significant symbolic significance, representing national pride, anti-colonial struggle, Hindu-Muslim unity, and rebellion against imperialism.
    • Legacy: The Revolt has left a lasting legacy in Indian history, shaping Indian nationalism, identity, anti-colonial movements, and nationalist leaders.
    • Historical Importance: The Revolt is an important milestone in Indian history, marking the beginning of a long struggle for independence and self-governance.
    See less
Karan Bedi
  • 2
Karan BediBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 2

Talk about how the Revolt affected politics and society in the long run, especially how British colonial control in India was restructured.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Hareem Khan
    Hareem Khan Begginer

    Long-Term Political and Social Consequences: The Revolt of 1857 had far-reaching and profound consequences for India, shaping the course of British colonial rule and Indian society. The following are some of the significant long-term political and social consequences: Reorganization of British ColonRead more

    Long-Term Political and Social Consequences:

    The Revolt of 1857 had far-reaching and profound consequences for India, shaping the course of British colonial rule and Indian society. The following are some of the significant long-term political and social consequences:

    Reorganization of British Colonial Rule:

    1. Direct Rule: The British government assumed direct control over India, replacing the East India Company, which had been responsible for governing India since the early 18th century.
    2. Viceroyalty: The British established the Viceroyalty of India, with the Viceroy serving as the representative of the British monarch in India.
    3. British Indian Army: The British reorganized the Indian Army, making it a more professional and efficient force, loyal to the British Crown.
    4. Indian Civil Service: The British reformed the Indian Civil Service, making it more centralized and accountable to the British government.

    Social Consequences:

    1. Loss of Privileges: The rebels who had fought against the British lost their privileges, including their lands, titles, and positions.
    2. Indian Nationalism: The Revolt of 1857 marked the beginning of Indian nationalism, as Indians began to question British rule and demand greater autonomy and self-governance.
    3. British Attitude: The British responded to the Revolt by adopting a more paternalistic and condescending attitude towards Indians, viewing them as inferior and in need of guidance.
    4. Social Reform: The Revolt led to increased social reform efforts in India, particularly in areas such as education, women’s rights, and social justice.

    Economic Consequences:

    1. Economic Depression: The Revolt led to a period of economic depression in India, as trade and commerce were disrupted, and many Indian businesses were destroyed.
    2. British Economic Interests: The British used the Revolt as an opportunity to further their economic interests in India, establishing new industries and exploiting India’s natural resources.
    3. Indian Economy: The Indian economy suffered due to the loss of Indian businesses, industries, and trade networks, which were replaced by British-owned enterprises.
    See less
Karan Bedi
  • 1
Karan BediBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 1

Determine the extent to which the Revolt was a collection of local uprisings or a cohesive national movement against the British.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Nandani Naina
    Nandani Naina Begginer

    Assessment of the Revolt: The Revolt of 1857 was a complex and multifaceted event that defies simple categorization. While it was often portrayed as a unified national movement against British colonial rule, it was actually a series of regional uprisings that were triggered by various factors, incluRead more

    Assessment of the Revolt:

    The Revolt of 1857 was a complex and multifaceted event that defies simple categorization. While it was often portrayed as a unified national movement against British colonial rule, it was actually a series of regional uprisings that were triggered by various factors, including economic, political, and social grievances.

    Arguments for a Unified National Movement:

    1. Shared Grievances: Many Indians, regardless of their region or caste, shared similar grievances against British colonial rule, including the seizure of land, exploitation of resources, and imposition of Western values.
    2. Nationalist Ideology: The Revolt of 1857 was influenced by the growing nationalist ideology in India, which emphasized the importance of Indian identity and the need for self-rule.
    3. Coordination: Some leaders, such as Bahadur Shah Zafar and Nana Sahib, attempted to coordinate their efforts across regions, which suggests a degree of unity and planning.

    Arguments for a Series of Regional Uprisings:

    1. Regional Differences: India is a vast and diverse country, with different regions having distinct cultural, linguistic, and economic characteristics. These differences often led to conflicting interests and priorities among different regions.
    2. Local Grievances: Many regional uprisings were sparked by local grievances, such as the seizure of land, exploitation of resources, and imposition of taxes. These grievances were not necessarily shared by other regions.
    3. Lack of Coordination: Despite some efforts at coordination, the Revolt of 1857 was marked by a lack of unity and coordination among different regions. This led to confusion, inefficiency, and ultimately, defeat.

    Conclusion:

    While there were some elements of a unified national movement against British colonial rule during the Revolt of 1857, it is more accurate to describe the revolt as a series of regional uprisings that were sparked by various local grievances and concerns. The revolt was not a single, cohesive movement that was driven by a shared sense of national identity or purpose.

    Key Points:

    • Complexity: The Revolt of 1857 was a complex and multifaceted event that cannot be reduced to a simple narrative.
    • Regional Differences: Regional differences played a significant role in shaping the revolt, with different regions having distinct grievances and priorities.
    • Local Grievances: Local grievances were often the primary driver of the revolt, rather than a shared sense of national identity or purpose.
    See less
Karan Bedi
  • 1
Karan BediBegginer
Asked: August 6, 2024In:
  • 1

Talk about the various roles that various social and political organizations played in the Revolt and the reasons behind their involvement.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Nandani Naina
    Nandani Naina Begginer

    The Revolt of 1857: A Diverse and Complex Rebellion Diverse Social and Political Groups: Indian Army SePoys: The Indian army sepoys, who were mainly Hindu and Muslim, played a crucial role in the revolt. They were motivated by a sense of patriotism, religious identity, and resentment against the BriRead more

    The Revolt of 1857: A Diverse and Complex Rebellion

    Diverse Social and Political Groups:

    1. Indian Army SePoys: The Indian army sepoys, who were mainly Hindu and Muslim, played a crucial role in the revolt. They were motivated by a sense of patriotism, religious identity, and resentment against the British for their perceived injustice and mistreatment.
    2. Peasants and Artisans: Peasants and artisans from various regions, including the Doab, the Punjab, and the Bengal Presidency, joined the revolt. They were motivated by economic grievances, such as high taxes and exploitation by British agents.
    3. Nobility and Chiefs: Members of the Indian nobility and chiefs, including Rani Laxmi Bai of Jhansi and Nana Saheb of Bithur, participated in the revolt. They were motivated by a desire to restore their lost power and prestige.
    4. Religious Leaders: Many religious leaders, including Muslim clergy and Hindu pandits, supported the revolt. They were motivated by a desire to defend their religious beliefs and traditions.
    5. Mughal Descendants: The Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar, who was the last ruler of the Mughal Empire, played a significant role in the revolt. He was motivated by a desire to restore the Mughal Empire to its former glory.

    Varied Motivations:

    1. Nationalist Sentiment: Many participants in the revolt were motivated by a sense of nationalism and a desire to throw off British rule.
    2. Religious Identity: The revolt was also driven by religious identity, with many Muslims and Hindus joining the rebellion to defend their faiths.
    3. Economic Grievances: Economic grievances, such as high taxes and exploitation by British agents, were another key motivator for many participants.
    4. Personal Grievances: Personal grievances, such as the loss of property or status, also played a role in motivating some participants.
    5. Rhetoric of Reform: Some participants were motivated by rhetoric of reform, which emphasized the need to restore traditional Indian customs and institutions.

    Key Points:

    • Diverse Groups with Varied Motivations: The Revolt of 1857 involved diverse social and political groups with varied motivations for participating.
    • Complexity of the Revolt: The complexity of the revolt was due to the diverse range of motivations and goals among its participants.
    • Role of Leadership: The role of leadership, including figures like Rani Laxmi Bai and Nana Saheb, was crucial in mobilizing support for the revolt.
    See less
Laila Mehta
  • 1
Laila MehtaBegginer
Asked: August 7, 2024In:
  • 1

Analyze the immediate and underlying reasons of the 1857 Revolt.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Nandani Naina
    Nandani Naina Begginer

    The Revolt of 1857: A Complex Confluence of Factors Immediate Causes: The Sepoy Mutiny: The spark that ignited the revolt was the Sepoy Mutiny, which began on May 10, 1857, when a group of Indian sepoys in Meerut rebelled against their British officers. The Use of Greased Cartridges: The introductioRead more

    The Revolt of 1857: A Complex Confluence of Factors

    Immediate Causes:

    1. The Sepoy Mutiny: The spark that ignited the revolt was the Sepoy Mutiny, which began on May 10, 1857, when a group of Indian sepoys in Meerut rebelled against their British officers.
    2. The Use of Greased Cartridges: The introduction of the Enfield rifle, which required sepoys to bite the end of the cartridge to open it, led to resentment among Indian troops who were forced to use cartridges lubricated with pig fat and cow fat.
    3. The Expansion of British Rule: The British East India Company’s expansion into India, which had begun in the early 18th century, had led to widespread resistance and resentment among Indian populations.

    Underlying Causes:

    1. Colonialism and Imperialism: The British colonial rule in India was based on the principles of exploitation and domination, which created deep-seated resentment among Indian populations.
    2. Economic Dislocation: The British colonial rule had led to economic dislocation and disruption of traditional Indian economic systems, causing widespread poverty and unemployment.
    3. Cultural Disintegration: The British colonial rule had also led to the disintegration of Indian culture and tradition, as the British imposed their own customs and values on Indian society.
    4. Social Changes: The British colonial rule had also brought about social changes, such as the decline of traditional social hierarchies and the rise of new social classes, which created social tensions and conflicts.

    Recent Examples:

    • The Kashmir Conflict: The ongoing conflict in Kashmir between Indian security forces and separatist groups can be seen as a modern-day example of the kind of cultural and political tensions that can lead to conflict.
    • The Naxalite Movement: The Naxalite movement, which began in the 1960s as a peasant uprising against government policies, has been ongoing for decades and is an example of the kind of social and economic tensions that can lead to conflict.
    See less
Laila Mehta
  • 1
Laila MehtaBegginer
Asked: August 7, 2024In:
  • 1

Evaluate the leadership and strategies used by prominent figures in the Revolt, such as Bahadur Shah Zafar and Nana Sahib.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Nandani Naina
    Nandani Naina Begginer

    Leadership and Strategies of the Key Figures: The Revolt of 1857, also known as the Indian Rebellion of 1857, was a significant event in Indian history that saw the coordinated efforts of several key figures, including Bahadur Shah Zafar and Nana Sahib. While the revolt was ultimately unsuccessful,Read more

    Leadership and Strategies of the Key Figures:

    The Revolt of 1857, also known as the Indian Rebellion of 1857, was a significant event in Indian history that saw the coordinated efforts of several key figures, including Bahadur Shah Zafar and Nana Sahib. While the revolt was ultimately unsuccessful, the leadership and strategies employed by these figures played a crucial role in shaping the course of Indian history.

    Bahadur Shah Zafar:

    1. Leadership Style: Bahadur Shah Zafar, the last Mughal Emperor, was a skilled leader who relied on his experience and charisma to inspire his followers.
    2. Strategic Planning: He planned his military campaigns carefully, taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of his opponents.
    3. Diplomatic Efforts: Bahadur Shah Zafar attempted to negotiate with other Indian kingdoms and princely states to secure their support for the rebellion.
    4. Symbolic Significance: As the last Mughal Emperor, he became a symbol of Indian resistance against British colonial rule, inspiring many Indians to join the rebellion.

    Nana Sahib:

    1. Militant Leadership: Nana Sahib, a young leader from the Peshwa dynasty, was known for his bravery and military prowess.
    2. Military Strategy: He employed guerrilla warfare tactics, using his knowledge of the terrain and his local support to launch surprise attacks on British forces.
    3. Tactical Flexibility: Nana Sahib was able to adapt his strategy as needed, shifting from conventional battles to guerrilla warfare when necessary.
    4. Leadership by Example: He led by example, inspiring his followers with his bravery and selflessness.

    Comparison of Leadership and Strategies:

    1. Stability vs. Flexibility: Bahadur Shah Zafar’s leadership style was more stable and institutional, whereas Nana Sahib’s was more flexible and adaptable.
    2. Conventional Warfare vs. Guerrilla Warfare: Bahadur Shah Zafar’s military campaigns were more focused on conventional warfare, whereas Nana Sahib’s used guerrilla warfare tactics.
    3. Diplomatic Efforts: Both leaders made diplomatic efforts to secure support for the rebellion, but Bahadur Shah Zafar’s attempts were more focused on negotiating with other Indian kingdoms and princely states.

    Key Points:

    • Leadership was Crucial: The leadership and strategies employed by Bahadur Shah Zafar and Nana Sahib were crucial in shaping the course of the Revolt of 1857.
    • Diverse Approaches: Both leaders employed different approaches to achieve their goals, reflecting their unique strengths and experiences.
    • Legacy: The legacy of these leaders continues to inspire Indians to this day, serving as a reminder of the sacrifices made during the struggle for Indian independence.
    See less
Laila Mehta
  • 1
Laila MehtaBegginer
Asked: August 7, 2024In:
  • 1

Examine the Revolt’s impact on the emerging nationalist spirit and the following stages of the independence struggle.

upsc: revolt of 1857
  1. Hareem Khan
    Hareem Khan Begginer

    Impact of the Revolt on Nationalist Sentiment: The Revolt of 1857 had a profound impact on the evolving nationalist sentiment in India. The rebellion marked a turning point in the Indian independence movement, as it: Fuelled Anti-British Sentiment: The brutal suppression of the rebellion by the BritRead more

    Impact of the Revolt on Nationalist Sentiment:

    The Revolt of 1857 had a profound impact on the evolving nationalist sentiment in India. The rebellion marked a turning point in the Indian independence movement, as it:

    1. Fuelled Anti-British Sentiment: The brutal suppression of the rebellion by the British led to widespread resentment and anger towards British rule.
    2. Inspired Nationalist Consciousness: The Revolt sparked a sense of national identity and pride among Indians, as they began to question British rule and demand greater autonomy.
    3. Accelerated Nationalist Movement: The Revolt accelerated the nationalist movement, as Indians from all walks of life began to organize and participate in various forms of resistance against British rule.

    Subsequent Phases of the Independence Movement:

    1. Moderate Phase (1857-1885): The Revolt gave rise to moderate nationalist leaders, such as Dadabhai Naoroji and Pherozeshah Mehta, who advocated for gradual reforms and greater autonomy within the British Empire.
    2. Extremist Phase (1885-1915): The subsequent rise of extremist leaders, such as Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Lala Hardayal, marked a shift towards more radical and violent forms of resistance against British rule.
    3. Gandhian Phase (1915-1947): Mahatma Gandhi’s leadership and philosophy of non-violent resistance revolutionized the Indian independence movement, as Indians from all walks of life came together to fight for independence through non-violent means.
    4. Quit India Movement (1942): The Quit India Movement, led by Gandhi, marked a turning point in the independence movement, as Indians demanded immediate independence from British rule.
    5. Indian Independence (1947): The Indian Independence Act, passed by the British Parliament, granted independence to India on August 15, 1947, marking the culmination of the long struggle for independence
    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts

Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र

मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

India’s Disaster Management

The article discusses the growing tensions between the Centre and states regarding disaster relief funding in India. It emphasizes the need for a transparent and equitable disaster management framework. Key Disaster Threats India Faces Increasing Frequency of Extreme Weather Events ...

Explore Our Blog