Appointing people after retirement guarantees that judicial decision-making is not influenced by unfavorable incentives when it comes to institutional design. Remark.
The High Courts in India are the highest courts of record in their respective jurisdictions and play a crucial role in the administration of justice, interpretation of laws, and oversight of subordinate courts. Here's an analysis of their composition, powers, and functions: Composition: The High CouRead more
The High Courts in India are the highest courts of record in their respective jurisdictions and play a crucial role in the administration of justice, interpretation of laws, and oversight of subordinate courts. Here’s an analysis of their composition, powers, and functions:
Composition:
- The High Courts are established by the Constitution of India under Article 214.
- Each High Court consists of a Chief Justice and other judges as may be specified by the Chief Justice of India.
- The strength of each High Court is determined by the Chief Justice of India, subject to the approval of the President of India.
Powers:
- The High Courts have original, appellate, and advisory jurisdiction.
- They have the power to issue writs, including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, and certiorari.
- They have the power to review and revise judgments of subordinate courts.
- They have the power to interpret laws and make binding precedents.
Role in Administration of Justice:
- The High Courts are responsible for ensuring the efficient administration of justice in their respective jurisdictions.
- They have the power to regulate the subordinate courts and ensure that they function efficiently.
- They have the power to appoint and transfer judges to subordinate courts.
Role in Interpretation of Laws:
- The High Courts are responsible for interpreting laws and making binding precedents.
- They have the power to strike down laws that are unconstitutional or violate fundamental rights.
- They have the power to clarify ambiguities in laws and provide guidance to lower courts.
Oversight of Subordinate Courts:
- The High Courts have the power to supervise and monitor the functioning of subordinate courts.
- They can issue guidelines and directions to subordinate courts to ensure that they function efficiently and fairly.
- They can review and revise judgments of subordinate courts.
Mechanisms for Transfer and Elevation of High Court Judges:
- The transfer and elevation of High Court judges are governed by the Supreme Court Rules, 1966.
- The Chief Justice of India has the power to transfer judges between High Courts.
- The President of India has the power to elevate judges from High Courts to the Supreme Court.
Comparison with Subnational Judicial Systems in Other Federal Democracies:
- In the United States, each state has its own supreme court, which is independent from the federal judiciary.
- In Canada, each province has its own supreme court, which is responsible for interpreting provincial laws.
- In Australia, each state has its own supreme court, which is responsible for interpreting state laws.
Key differences:
- In India, the High Courts are responsible for interpreting federal laws as well as state laws, whereas in other federal democracies, this responsibility lies with separate federal and state courts.
- In India, the Chief Justice of India has a significant role in transferring and elevating judges between High Courts, whereas in other federal democracies, this role is typically played by the head of government or a separate judicial authority.
In conclusion, the High Courts in India play a crucial role in the administration of justice, interpretation of laws, and oversight of subordinate courts. Their composition, powers, and functions are unique in comparison to subnational judicial systems in other federal democracies.
See less
Judges are appointed to various quasi-judicial bodies and government positions post-retirement such as NHRC, NGT, Rajya Sabha MP, Governor etc. These are not barred in the constitution. A report by Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy pointed out that as many as 70 out of 100 judges retired from the SupremRead more
Judges are appointed to various quasi-judicial bodies and government positions post-retirement such as NHRC, NGT, Rajya Sabha MP, Governor etc. These are not barred in the constitution. A report by Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy pointed out that as many as 70 out of 100 judges retired from the Supreme Court have taken up assignments in the many tribunals and commissions. However, these appointments raise questions on integrity of the judges as many perceive that such appointments act as an incentive for the judges to decide cases in favour of the state. This undermines judicial independence, erodes public trust, and violates basic tenets of the constitution such as separation of power. Therefore, there is a need to adopt a right institutional design to prevent perverse incentives in judicial decision-making. Since the presence of judges can bring valuable experience and legal knowledge to various institutions, some measures can be taken to preserve judicial impartiality and independence:
Independence of judiciary forms a part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution. Further, being the guardian of the Constitution, the judiciary needs to be insulated from pressures and inducements. Functioning of judiciary without any bias, favoritism or appeasement is a must for maintaining tenets of democracy in India.
See less