Home/upsc: judiciary
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
Explain the reasons for the growth of public interest litigation in India. As a result of it, has the Indian Supreme Court emerged as the world's most powerful judiciary? (Answer in 250 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Introduction Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has fundamentally reshaped the judicial system in India by empowering courts to champion the rights of marginalized communities. Rooted in Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution, PIL enables individuals or groups to file petitions inRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has fundamentally reshaped the judicial system in India by empowering courts to champion the rights of marginalized communities. Rooted in Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution, PIL enables individuals or groups to file petitions in the High Courts and Supreme Court on behalf of those whose rights are under threat, expanding judicial reach.
Reasons for the Growth of Public Interest Litigation in India
Supreme Court Emerging as the World’s Most Powerful Judiciary
The Indian Supreme Court has emerged as a powerful judiciary through its expansive interpretation of rights and intervention in governance. It has used PILs to broaden the interpretation of constitutional rights, influencing legislative domains. For example, in the MC Mehta vs. Union of India (1986) case, a PIL prompted the Supreme Court to broaden the interpretation of the right to a healthy environment under Article 21 . The court’s ability to intervene in policy-making and its broad judicial review powers have allowed it to examine the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions, giving it immense influence over national policies.
Conclusion
The innovative use of PIL has positioned the Indian Supreme Court as a powerful force for social justice and legal reform, addressing systemic issues and protecting the rights of marginalized communities. However, to maintain its efficacy, reforms to the PIL process must prioritize public interest while ensuring judicial balance.
See lessExplain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals. Whether they entertain civil as well as criminal cases? (Answer in 150 words) [UPSC 2024]
Model Answer Lok Adalats vs. Arbitration Tribunals Both Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals serve as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms aimed at resolving disputes outside the conventional court system. However, they differ in terms of nature, jurisdiction, and procedures. DistinctionRead more
Model Answer
Lok Adalats vs. Arbitration Tribunals
Both Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals serve as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms aimed at resolving disputes outside the conventional court system. However, they differ in terms of nature, jurisdiction, and procedures.
Distinction between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals
Nature of Disputes
Legal Basis
Voluntary Nature
Appointment of Judges/Arbitrators
Cost Efficiency
Appeal Process
Role of Lawyers
Speed of Resolution
Civil and Criminal Case Jurisdiction
- Lok Adalats handle civil matters and minor criminal cases (compoundable offences), such as cheque bounce cases and motor accident claims.
- Arbitration Tribunals strictly deal with civil matters, particularly commercial disputes, as seen in the Ambani family asset dispute.
See lessEvaluate the practicality and challenges of establishing the All-India Judicial Service (AIJS) as a reform for recruiting and appointing members of the subordinate judiciary in India. (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction The All-India Judicial Service (AIJS) has been proposed as a national-level recruitment system to address systemic issues in the judiciary, such as vacancies, lack of meritocracy, and political interference. Endorsed by NITI Aayog and President Droupadi Murmu, it aims to brRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The All-India Judicial Service (AIJS) has been proposed as a national-level recruitment system to address systemic issues in the judiciary, such as vacancies, lack of meritocracy, and political interference. Endorsed by NITI Aayog and President Droupadi Murmu, it aims to bring uniformity and enhance judicial quality, but it also faces significant challenges.
Feasibility of AIJS Implementation
Challenges of AIJS Implementation
Way Forward
Conclusion
AIJS has the potential to transform India’s judiciary by ensuring meritocracy and addressing systemic issues. However, its success hinges on overcoming constitutional, administrative, and political challenges through a balanced and inclusive approach. A consensus-driven implementation strategy is essential to make AIJS a reality.
See lessExamine the evolution of the protection of freedom of expression in India through the constitutional interpretations made by the Supreme Court, highlighting key case laws. (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction The protection of freedom of expression in India has evolved significantly, especially through the constitutional interpretations by the Supreme Court. Enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, this right has been progressively interpreted to reflect theRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The protection of freedom of expression in India has evolved significantly, especially through the constitutional interpretations by the Supreme Court. Enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, this right has been progressively interpreted to reflect the changing dynamics of society and governance.
Early Restrictive Approach
Shift Towards Expansive Interpretation
Key Developments in the Protection of Free Expression
Widening Scope for Political, Artistic, and Social Speech
New Challenges with Social Media
Sedition Law and Dissent
Conclusion
Through various judgments, the Supreme Court has broadened the scope of freedom of expression, ensuring its applicability in diverse areas like media, political speech, and digital expression. These interpretations reflect an evolving understanding of the right to free speech, balancing individual liberty with societal responsibility.
See lessDiscuss the key features and significance of the Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008 for India. (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction The Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008, is a significant legislative effort aimed at making justice more accessible to India's rural population. By establishing Gram Nyayalayas or village courts, the Act aims to provide affordable, efficient, and decentralized legal services at theRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008, is a significant legislative effort aimed at making justice more accessible to India’s rural population. By establishing Gram Nyayalayas or village courts, the Act aims to provide affordable, efficient, and decentralized legal services at the grassroots level.
Key Features of the Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008:
Conclusion
The Gram Nyayalayas Act, 2008, represents a significant step towards decentralizing the Indian judicial system, providing accessible and affordable justice to rural areas. By addressing the needs of rural populations through quick, cost-effective, and culturally relevant legal proceedings, it strengthens the overall judicial framework, eases the burden on higher courts, and contributes to the efficiency of the justice system in India.
See lessHow has the judiciary evolved from merely restricting government actions to actively mandating them, and what is its role in policy formulation? Critically analyze. (200 words)
Model Answer Introduction The role of the judiciary in India has evolved significantly over time. Traditionally tasked with restricting government actions, the judiciary has increasingly played an active role in policy formulation. This shift raises important questions about its influence in shapingRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The role of the judiciary in India has evolved significantly over time. Traditionally tasked with restricting government actions, the judiciary has increasingly played an active role in policy formulation. This shift raises important questions about its influence in shaping laws and public policy, often stepping in where the legislature has failed to act.
Judiciary’s Positive Contribution to Policy Formulation:
Critical View
Conclusion
The judiciary’s expanded role in policy formulation has both advantages and drawbacks. While it plays a critical role in addressing legislative gaps and protecting rights, its growing influence must be balanced carefully with the democratic principles of legislative supremacy and executive accountability. It is essential that the judiciary complements, rather than replaces, the legislative and executive branches in ensuring effective governance.
See lessWhat are the challenges hindering Online Dispute Resolution's (ODR) potential to provide just, speedy, and effective resolution of disputes? (200 Words)
Model Answer While Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) has the potential to transform dispute resolution by making it more accessible, quick, and cost-effective, there are several challenges that limit its effectiveness. 1. Lack of Adequate Digital Infrastructure A key barrier to ODR is the lack of digiRead more
Model Answer
While Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) has the potential to transform dispute resolution by making it more accessible, quick, and cost-effective, there are several challenges that limit its effectiveness.
1. Lack of Adequate Digital Infrastructure
A key barrier to ODR is the lack of digital infrastructure. Effective ODR requires access to devices like smartphones and computers, along with reliable internet connectivity. In many parts of the world, particularly in rural and underserved areas, this infrastructure is either inadequate or unavailable. In India, for example, internet penetration is significantly lower in rural areas, with only 17% of rural households having internet access compared to 44% in urban areas (2023 report). This digital divide limits the reach of ODR and prevents equitable access to justice for all citizens.
2. Privacy and Confidentiality Concerns
ODR systems also face significant privacy and confidentiality challenges. The digital environment increases the risk of online impersonation, data breaches, and unauthorized access to sensitive documents. Given the nature of many disputes that require confidentiality, such as personal or business matters, the security of the digital platforms used for ODR is a critical concern. The potential for data misuse or leaks can undermine trust in these systems.
3. Issues with Determining the ‘Place of Proceedings’
In traditional dispute resolution, the concept of a ‘place of arbitration’ is clear, but ODR complicates this due to its virtual nature. When parties are located in different jurisdictions, it becomes challenging to determine which laws apply, and where the legal authority resides. This ambiguity can cause delays and confusion, detracting from ODR’s potential to provide a speedy resolution.
In conclusion, while ODR offers promising benefits, these challenges must be addressed to fully unlock its potential for delivering just, speedy, and effective dispute resolution.
See lessHow have the courts' evolving interpretations expanded the scope of the Right to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution? Discuss with reference to relevant case laws. (200 Words)
Model Answer Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. Over time, the Supreme Court of India has expanded the scope of this fundamental right, interpreting it beyond mere physical existence to encompass a wide range of human needs and dignity. Right toRead more
Model Answer
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. Over time, the Supreme Court of India has expanded the scope of this fundamental right, interpreting it beyond mere physical existence to encompass a wide range of human needs and dignity.
Right to Livelihood: Olga Tellis (1986)
In Olga Tellis & Ors. vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation (1986), the Supreme Court interpreted the right to life to include the right to livelihood. The Court held that no one can live without the means of subsistence, thereby extending the scope of Article 21 to encompass the right to earn a living as a fundamental component of life.
Right to Medical Assistance: Pt. Parmanand Katara (1989)
In Pt. Parmanand Katara vs. Union of India (1989), the Court ruled that medical professionals are obligated to provide urgent medical care to all individuals, regardless of their background or financial status. This decision expanded Article 21 to include the right to immediate medical treatment, reflecting the right to life as encompassing health care.
Right to a Healthy Environment: Subhash Kumar (1991)
The Subhash Kumar vs. State of Bihar (1991) judgment further extended Article 21, declaring that the right to life includes the right to live in a pollution-free environment. This ruling emphasized the State’s responsibility to ensure access to clean air and water, which are essential for survival and well-being.
Right to Privacy: Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (2017)
The Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India (2017) case marked a landmark judgment in which the Supreme Court affirmed that the right to privacy is intrinsic to the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. The Court held that privacy is an essential aspect of human dignity, thus expanding the interpretation of personal liberty.
Right to Die with Dignity: Common Cause (2018)
In Common Cause vs. Union of India (2018), the Court recognized the right to die with dignity, allowing passive euthanasia. This ruling acknowledged that the right to life also includes the right to choose the manner and timing of one’s death, further broadening the scope of personal liberty.
Right to Protection from Climate Change: MK Ranjitsinh (2024)
The Supreme Court, in M K Ranjitsinh & Ors. vs. Union of India (2024), recognized the right to be free from the harmful effects of climate change as part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21. This ruling reflects the Court’s recognition of environmental factors as critical to the protection of human life and dignity.
Through these evolving interpretations, the scope of Article 21 has significantly expanded, ensuring a broader, more inclusive protection of fundamental rights in India.
See lessHow do the shortcomings in the Indian criminal justice system affect the human rights of undertrial prisoners? What reforms are needed to rectify these issues?( 200 Words)
Model Answer Introduction Undertrial prisoners form a significant portion of India's prison population, accounting for 77.1% of the total inmates in 2022, as per the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). The systemic deficiencies in the Indian criminal justice system lead to severe human rights violRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Undertrial prisoners form a significant portion of India’s prison population, accounting for 77.1% of the total inmates in 2022, as per the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). The systemic deficiencies in the Indian criminal justice system lead to severe human rights violations for these prisoners.
Overcrowding and Poor Conditions
Overcrowding is a major issue in Indian prisons, with the occupancy rate reaching 118.5% in 2019 (NCRB). This results in substandard living conditions for undertrials, including inadequate accommodation, poor healthcare, and insufficient food. These conditions directly violate the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Delay in Trials and Denial of Right to a Speedy Trial
The slow judicial process is another significant challenge. As of December 2021, 70.9% of undertrial prisoners had been confined for up to one year, often without a verdict. This delay violates their right to a speedy trial, as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Custodial Abuse and Deaths
Custodial abuse remains prevalent, with incidents of torture and deaths in custody. According to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), 17,146 people died in judicial or police custody between 2010 and 2020—an alarming statistic that highlights the abuse faced by undertrials.
Discrimination and Marginalization
Most undertrials come from marginalized communities, particularly Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). In Tamil Nadu, for example, two-thirds of undertrials belong to these groups, highlighting systemic inequality.
Necessary Reforms
Speedy Trials and Affordable Bail
To address these deficiencies, expediting the judicial process and providing affordable bail options are crucial. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has already set aside Rs. 20 crores annually for financial assistance to poor prisoners to secure bail.
Judicial Accountability and Prison Reforms
Courts must adhere to procedural mandates to prevent arbitrary arrests, as emphasized in the Supreme Court’s ruling in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2014). Further, comprehensive legal aid, vocational training programs, and the passing of the Prevention of Torture Bill (2010) would significantly improve conditions for undertrials.
Conclusion
By implementing these reforms, India can mitigate the systemic issues in its criminal justice system, ensuring justice, dignity, and human rights for all undertrial prisoners.
See lessThe Supreme Court of India recently acknowledged that the right to protection from the harmful effects of climate change is closely linked to the right to life and equality. Discuss the judiciary's role in the constitutionalization of environmental issues. ( 200 Words)
And the recent Indian Supreme Court recognition that the right to be protected from the adverse effects of climate change is inextricably linked to the right to life and equality is a watershed moment of the legal integration of the environment. This ruling underscores the judiciary’s growing involvRead more
And the recent Indian Supreme Court recognition that the right to be protected from the adverse effects of climate change is inextricably linked to the right to life and equality is a watershed moment of the legal integration of the environment. This ruling underscores the judiciary’s growing involvement in addressing environmental problems and illustrates a growing recognition that the environment is a human right. In the context of India, the courts have often become proactive defenders of environmental justice, expanding the meaning of constitutional rights to include the need for environmental protection. The right to clean and healthy environment has now emerged as a significant facet of the right to life articulated in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. This line of thinking is not novel but it keeps evolving, and perhaps more so as we begin to experience climate change ramifications that are increasingly acute and widespread. The Supreme Court’s decision stands as proof that the mission of protecting the environment is promoted by the Court’s energy in requiring that environmental protection be more than just policy consideration — it is a constitutional obligation.
The Court connects climate change to rights with its reference to life and equality, emphasising that environmental degradation affects the most vulnerable, those most in need of protection and that this affects future generations too, and that there must be accountability for basic rights. It demands that the government implements stricter policies to address climate change and protect the environment, ensuring that all citizens have a healthy and safe habitat — regardless of social or economic standing.
Additionally, the role of the judiciary in integrating environmental issues into constitutional discourses is crucial for ensuring government accountability in its policies and actions related to the environment. Through instruments like public interest litigation (PIL), courts can order implementation of stricter regulations, application of existing laws, and consideration of new ideas to resolve environmental challenges. This activism invokes environmental matters in the broader field of human rights and constitutional law, creating more synergies because a case should be treated fairly both regarding human rights and the environment.
The Supreme Court, finally realizing that the environment having dealt in its margin, as climate change sustains the existential threat, will no longer be an issue for civil regulation, but a matter of constitutional law, has now adopted the position according to which the protection the environment is a duty of the state and the human right to the environment is the main feature of constitutional law. This decision by the court affirms that recognition and will guide policies and ruling in the future towards a more sustainable and just society.
See less