The inclusion of Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) in the Indian Constitution was a unique and significant feature, reflecting the framers’ vision for the socio-economic transformation of the country. The underlying philosophy behind the DPSP can be understood through the following key aspects:

Socio-Economic Justice: The DPSP were intended to provide a framework for the creation of a social order based on justice, equality, and the promotion of the welfare of the people. They aimed to address the historical inequities and disparities in Indian society.
Balancing Individual Rights and Societal Welfare: While the Constitution guaranteed fundamental rights to individuals, the DPSP sought to balance these rights with the broader goal of promoting the common good and the welfare of the entire population.
Guiding Principle for Governance: The DPSP were envisioned as a set of non-justiciable principles that would serve as a guiding light for the government in formulating policies and enacting laws to achieve the socio-economic objectives of the Constitution.
Aspirational Goals: The DPSP represented the long-term, aspirational goals of the nation, which were to be gradually realized through the concerted efforts of the government and the people.
The influence of the DPSP on the policy and legislative agenda of successive governments has been significant, albeit with varying degrees of impact:

Policy Formulation: The DPSP have influenced the formulation of various national policies, such as the National Health Policy, the National Education Policy, and the National Policy for Older Persons, among others. These policies have sought to address the socio-economic concerns outlined in the DPSP.
Legislative Initiatives: Several laws and amendments have been enacted by the government to give effect to the DPSP, such as the Minimum Wages Act, the Equal Remuneration Act, and the Right to Education Act.
Judicial Interpretation: While the DPSP are non-justiciable, the courts have, on numerous occasions, used them as a guiding principle in interpreting the fundamental rights and balancing individual liberties with societal welfare.
Political Discourse and Manifesto: The DPSP have featured prominently in the election manifestos and political discourse of various political parties, underscoring their continued relevance and importance in the national agenda.
However, the implementation and realization of the DPSP have faced several challenges:

Resource Constraints: The achievement of the DPSP is often hindered by the limited financial and administrative resources available to the government, particularly at the state and local levels.
Competing Priorities: Governments may sometimes prioritize economic growth and development over the immediate fulfillment of the DPSP, leading to a potential trade-off between short-term gains and long-term societal transformation.
Lack of Justiciability: The non-justiciable nature of the DPSP means that the courts cannot directly enforce them, limiting their legal enforceability and the ability of citizens to seek redress for their non-implementation.
Changing Political Priorities: The shifting political landscape and the varying ideological orientations of successive governments can lead to fluctuations in the emphasis placed on the DPSP and their implementation.
In conclusion, the inclusion of the Directive Principles of State Policy in the Indian Constitution reflects the framers’ vision of a welfare state and a more equitable and just society. While their influence on policymaking and legislation has been significant, the realization of the DPSP continues to be a work in progress, faced with resource constraints, competing priorities, and the inherent challenges of their non-justiciable nature.