Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question
Home/upsc: history of constitution

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Rahul Agarwal
  • 4
Rahul AgarwalBegginer
Asked: July 8, 2024In:
  • 4

Analyze the historical factors that influenced the Indian Constitution’s design.

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Debdatta Das
    Debdatta Das Begginer

    (i) Following are some historical forces which shaped the vision of the Constitution. Certain basic values were accepted by all national leaders as a result of the Nehru Report and the Fundamental Rights Resolution passed the Karachi session of the Indian National Congress. (ii) Universal Adult FranRead more

    (i) Following are some historical forces which shaped the vision of the Constitution. Certain basic values were accepted by all national leaders as a result of the Nehru Report and the Fundamental Rights Resolution passed the Karachi session of the Indian National Congress.
    (ii) Universal Adult Franchise, Right to Freedom and Equality and Protection of minority rights were these basic values.
    (iii) After the results of 1937 elections, the Congress and other political parties were able to form the governments in the provinces.
    (iv) This experience with legislative and political institutions helped in developing an agreement over institutional design.
    (v) Many colonial laws were also the sources of the Indian Constitution. Government of India Act, 1935 was a major one.

    See less
Akash Patel
  • 1
Akash PatelBegginer
Asked: July 15, 2024In:
  • 1

Examine the Seventh Schedule’s inclusion as well as the clauses dividing the Union’s and the state’s legislative, executive, and financial authorities. In what ways has the federal framework changed in real life?

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Rohan Basu
    Rohan Basu Scholar

    The Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution is a crucial part of the federal structure, which divides the legislative powers between the Union and the States. The schedule is divided into three lists, which allocate powers between the Centre and the States. The evolution of this federal structurRead more

    The Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution is a crucial part of the federal structure, which divides the legislative powers between the Union and the States. The schedule is divided into three lists, which allocate powers between the Centre and the States. The evolution of this federal structure has been significant, and this essay will assess the inclusion of the Seventh Schedule and the provisions for the division of legislative, executive, and financial powers.

    Inclusion of the Seventh Schedule: The Seventh Schedule was incorporated into the Constitution to ensure a clear division of powers between the Union and the States. The schedule consists of three lists:

    1. List I: Union List: This list contains 97 subjects, which are exclusively under the purview of the Union Government. These subjects include matters like defense, foreign affairs, communication, and currency.
    2. List II: State List: This list contains 66 subjects, which are exclusively under the purview of the State Governments. These subjects include matters like agriculture, education, healthcare, and police.
    3. List III: Concurrent List: This list contains 47 subjects, which are under the jurisdiction of both the Union and State Governments. These subjects include matters like trade, commerce, and taxation.

    Provisions for Division of Powers: The Seventh Schedule provides a framework for dividing powers between the Union and State Governments. The Constitution ensures that:

    1. Legislative Powers: The Seventh Schedule outlines the subjects that are under the jurisdiction of each government. The Union Government has exclusive powers over matters in List I, while the State Governments have exclusive powers over matters in List II.
    2. Executive Powers: The Constitution ensures that each government has its own executive machinery to implement its laws. The Union Government has its own executive powers, while the State Governments have their own executive powers.
    3. Financial Powers: The Seventh Schedule also provides for the allocation of financial resources between the Union and State Governments. The Constitution ensures that each government has its own sources of revenue to fund its activities.

    Evolution of Federal Structure in Practice: Over time, the federal structure in India has undergone significant changes:

    1. Amendments: The Constitution has been amended several times to modify the division of powers between the Union and State Governments. For example, the 42nd Amendment Act (1976) introduced new provisions for centralization of power.
    2. Emergence of New Subjects: New subjects have been added to the schedules over time, such as environmental protection, disaster management, and cybercrime.
    3. Centralization of Power: In recent years, there has been a trend towards centralization of power at the Centre. This has led to concerns about erosion of state autonomy and excessive dependence on Central funding.
    4. Inter-Governmental Relations: The evolution of federal structure has also led to changes in inter-governmental relations. The Centre-State relations have become more complex, with increased cooperation and coordination between governments.
    5. Judicial Intervention: The judiciary has played a significant role in interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that the federal structure is maintained. Judgments such as S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) have emphasized the importance of maintaining state autonomy.
    See less
Anirudh Singh
  • 0
Anirudh SinghLearner
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the Constitution’s provisions about the preservation of basic rights. Talk about the justification for these rights’ inclusion as well as the arguments for and against their enforcement.

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Shree Shree Singh
    Shree Shree Singh Begginer

    The protection of fundamental rights is a core aspect of the Indian Constitution, reflecting the framers' commitment to safeguarding the liberties and dignities of the citizens. The inclusion of fundamental rights in the Constitution was driven by several key rationales: Safeguarding Individual FreeRead more

    The protection of fundamental rights is a core aspect of the Indian Constitution, reflecting the framers’ commitment to safeguarding the liberties and dignities of the citizens. The inclusion of fundamental rights in the Constitution was driven by several key rationales:

    Safeguarding Individual Freedoms: The fundamental rights were intended to protect the individual from the arbitrary exercise of state power and to guarantee certain basic freedoms, such as freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and movement.
    Promoting Social Justice: Provisions like the prohibition of discrimination and the protection of the rights of marginalized communities were aimed at addressing historical inequities and promoting social justice.
    Ensuring Rule of Law: The fundamental rights were meant to establish the rule of law and to check the potential for abuse of power by the government or the majority.
    Upholding Democratic Values: The fundamental rights were seen as essential for the sustenance of a vibrant democratic society, where citizens could actively participate and hold the government accountable.
    The scope and enforceability of these fundamental rights have been the subject of extensive debates and developments over the years:

    Scope of Fundamental Rights:

    The initial list of fundamental rights was expanded over time through constitutional amendments and judicial interpretations, reflecting evolving societal needs and aspirations.
    The judiciary played a crucial role in expanding the scope of rights, such as the recognition of the right to privacy as a fundamental right.
    However, there have also been debates around the limits of fundamental rights, particularly in balancing individual freedoms with the broader public interest.
    Enforceability of Fundamental Rights:

    The Constitution empowers the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court and High Courts, to act as the guardian of fundamental rights.
    Citizens can directly approach the courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights through the mechanism of public interest litigation (PIL).
    The courts have the power to declare any law or executive action that violates fundamental rights as unconstitutional and void.
    However, the enforcement of fundamental rights has faced challenges, such as delays in the judicial process and the limited resources of the courts to address the large volume of cases.
    Debates and Challenges:

    The scope of certain fundamental rights, such as the right to property, has been a subject of ongoing debate, with the government seeking to balance individual rights with the need for societal welfare.
    The application of fundamental rights in the private sphere, beyond the government’s actions, has also been a contentious issue.
    The potential conflict between individual rights and community/group rights has also been a point of discussion, particularly in the context of personal laws and cultural practices.
    The enforceability of fundamental rights for marginalized and disadvantaged groups, and the challenges they face in accessing the justice system, have been areas of concern.
    Overall, the inclusion of fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution has been a pivotal aspect of the country’s democratic framework, reflecting the framers’ vision of a society built on the principles of individual liberty, equality, and social justice. While the scope and enforceability of these rights have evolved over time, they continue to serve as a bulwark against the arbitrary exercise of power and as a means to uphold the core values of the Constitution.

    See less
Kumudini Lakhia
  • 0
Kumudini LakhiaEnthusiast
Asked: January 24, 2025In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing 1. Introduction Start with context: Begin by introducing the Government of India Act, 1935, as a significant piece of legislation passed during British colonial rule in India. Mention how it paved the way for self-governance and is considered ...

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Government of India Act, 1935, was a significant step towards India's self-governance under British colonial rule. It laid down several provisions that were later incorporated into India’s Constitution after independence. Sir Ivor Jennings even referred to the Indian CoRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Government of India Act, 1935, was a significant step towards India’s self-governance under British colonial rule. It laid down several provisions that were later incorporated into India’s Constitution after independence. Sir Ivor Jennings even referred to the Indian Constitution as a “Carbon Copy of the 1935 Act,” highlighting its influence on the post-independence legal and constitutional framework.

    Influence of the Government of India Act, 1935 on India’s Post-Independence Constitutional Framework:

    1. Federal Structure: The 1935 Act introduced a federal structure with a clear division of powers between the center and the provinces. This concept of federalism was carried forward into the Indian Constitution, which also divides powers between the Union and States.
    2. Directive Principles of State Policy: The Act included an “Instrument of Instructions” for the Governor-General, which emphasized public welfare, social justice, and economic development. This inspired the inclusion of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) in the Indian Constitution, guiding the government in achieving social and economic justice.
    3. Division of Powers: The Act classified subjects into three lists: federal, provincial, and concurrent, a structure that was replicated in India’s Constitution under the Seventh Schedule to manage the division of responsibilities between different levels of government.
    4. Bicameral Legislature: A bicameral legislature was introduced at both the central and provincial levels, a concept that influenced the design of India’s Parliament, consisting of the Lok Sabha (Lower House) and Rajya Sabha (Upper House).
    5. Judiciary: The Act established the Federal Court, which was later replaced by the Supreme Court of India, maintaining the need for an independent judiciary.
    6. Public Service Commission: The establishment of a Federal Public Service Commission set a precedent for the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) in post-independence India.
    7. Emergency Provisions: The 1935 Act included provisions for handling emergencies, which were adopted in India’s Constitution under Articles 352 to 360, ensuring a legal framework for national emergencies.

    Points of Differences

    1. Dominion Status vs. Sovereignty: The 1935 Act envisioned India as a dominion under British sovereignty, whereas the post-independence Constitution declared India as a sovereign republic.
    2. Provincial Autonomy: The 1935 Act retained significant central control, whereas the Indian Constitution provided greater autonomy to the states.
    3. Representation: The Act offered limited Indian representation, while the Indian Constitution introduced universal adult suffrage, ensuring broader democratic participation.
    4. Socio-Economic Reforms: The 1935 Act lacked provisions for critical socio-economic reforms such as the abolition of untouchability, a key feature of India’s Constitution.
    5. Role of Governor-General: The Act conferred substantial powers to the Governor-General, whereas in independent India, the President’s role became largely ceremonial and symbolic.

    Conclusion

    As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar noted, borrowing ideas from existing frameworks is not plagiarism but a method of learning and building upon them. While the Government of India Act, 1935, profoundly shaped the Indian Constitution, the latter remains a transformative document that reflects India’s unique aspirations for a just, democratic, and sovereign nation.

    See less
Team
  • 0
TeamSupreme
Asked: August 21, 2024In:
  • 0

Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Contextual Background: Briefly introduce the Government of India Act, 1935, as a significant reform in British India. Thesis Statement: State whether the Act laid down a federal constitution, emphasizing the complexities involved. Body 1. Features of the Act Supporting Federalism Division ...

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Team
    Best Answer
    Team Supreme

    Model Answer Introduction The Government of India Act, 1935, was a landmark legislation enacted by the British Parliament, aimed at reforming the governance of British India. It was the most comprehensive attempt to establish a federal structure, intending to unify British Indian provinces and princRead more

    Model Answer

    Introduction

    The Government of India Act, 1935, was a landmark legislation enacted by the British Parliament, aimed at reforming the governance of British India. It was the most comprehensive attempt to establish a federal structure, intending to unify British Indian provinces and princely states under a central authority. However, the effectiveness of its federal provisions remains a subject of debate.

    Body

    Division of Powers

    One of the key features of the Act was the clear division of powers between the central and provincial governments. It introduced three lists: the Federal List, the Provincial List, and the Concurrent List. This division was intended to delineate the responsibilities of each level of government.

    Provincial Autonomy

    The Act aimed to enhance provincial autonomy by granting greater powers to provincial governments, thereby allowing them to operate independently in various areas of governance. This devolution was crucial for federalism, as it aimed to reduce central control.

    Bicameral Legislature

    The Act established a bicameral federal legislature, comprising the Council of State and the Federal Assembly. This structure was designed to provide better representation for both British Indian provinces and princely states in the legislative process.

    Inclusion of Princely States

    A significant but challenging aspect was the inclusion of princely states in the proposed federation. Their participation was optional, and many states were hesitant to join due to concerns over sovereignty. This reluctance severely undermined the federal framework, as a critical mass of states was necessary for effective implementation.

    Conclusion

    While the Government of India Act, 1935, included features aimed at establishing a federal constitution, its provisions were never fully realized. The lack of participation from princely states, compounded by the political upheavals of the time, stymied the Act’s effectiveness. Nevertheless, it laid significant groundwork for the future Constitution of India, influencing its federal structure.

    See less
Gaurav Reddy
  • 0
Gaurav ReddyBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Analyze the impact of the 1935 Government of India Act on the creation of the Constitution of India. Talk about the differences and similarities with this previous constitutional structure.

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Goluram Singh
    Goluram Singh Begginer

    The Government of India Act, 1935 had a significant influence on the drafting of the Indian Constitution, with both continuities and departures observed in the final constitutional framework. Continuities: Federal Structure: Both the Government of India Act, 1935 and the Indian Constitution adoptedRead more

    The Government of India Act, 1935 had a significant influence on the drafting of the Indian Constitution, with both continuities and departures observed in the final constitutional framework.

    Continuities:

    Federal Structure: Both the Government of India Act, 1935 and the Indian Constitution adopted a federal structure, with a central government and provincial/state governments.
    Distribution of Powers: The Constitution retained the broad division of powers between the Union and the states, as established in the 1935 Act, with the Union government having greater powers.
    Bicameral Legislature: While the Indian Constitution ultimately opted for a unicameral Parliament at the Union level, the 1935 Act had established a bicameral legislature at the center, which was a reference point during the debates.
    Gubernatorial System: The Constitution retained the gubernatorial system, with the President/Governor acting as the nominal head of the Union/state governments.
    All-India Services: The Constitution continued the system of All-India Services, such as the Indian Administrative Service and the Indian Police Service, which were introduced in the 1935 Act.
    Departures:

    Constituent Assembly: The most significant departure was the drafting of the Constitution by a democratically elected Constituent Assembly, rather than being imposed by the British Parliament, as was the case with the 1935 Act.
    Strengthened Centre: The Indian Constitution granted the Union government significantly more powers compared to the 1935 Act, reflecting a stronger unitary bias.
    Fundamental Rights: The Constitution incorporated a comprehensive Bill of Fundamental Rights, which was absent in the 1935 Act.
    Directive Principles of State Policy: The Constitution introduced the novel concept of Directive Principles of State Policy, which were non-justiciable but guided the state’s policymaking.
    Judiciary: The Constitution established a unified, integrated judiciary, unlike the dual judiciary system envisaged in the 1935 Act.
    Electoral System: The Constitution introduced a system of direct elections to the Lok Sabha, as opposed to the indirect elections prescribed in the 1935 Act.
    The influence of the Government of India Act, 1935 is evident in the Indian Constitution, particularly in the broad federal structure and the distribution of powers between the Union and the states. However, the Constituent Assembly, guided by the vision of a democratic, sovereign, and egalitarian India, made significant departures to create a unique constitutional framework that better reflected the aspirations of the Indian people.

    See less
Ronak Lal
  • 0
Ronak LalBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the choice between a bicameral legislature and a single-chamber parliament. Which arguments were made in favor of and against this decision, and what effect has it had on the legislative process?

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Goluram Singh
    Goluram Singh Begginer

    The decision to adopt a single-chamber Parliament, as opposed to a bicameral legislature, was a significant and much-debated issue during the Constituent Assembly Debates. Arguments in Favor of a Single-Chamber Parliament: Efficiency and Expediency: The proponents argued that a unicameral system wouRead more

    The decision to adopt a single-chamber Parliament, as opposed to a bicameral legislature, was a significant and much-debated issue during the Constituent Assembly Debates.

    Arguments in Favor of a Single-Chamber Parliament:

    Efficiency and Expediency: The proponents argued that a unicameral system would enable quicker decision-making and more efficient legislative processes, which was crucial for a newly independent nation facing numerous challenges.
    Avoiding Legislative Deadlocks: The concern was that a bicameral legislature could lead to deadlocks between the two houses, hindering the passage of important legislation.
    Representation of the People: The Constituent Assembly members believed that the directly elected Lok Sabha would be a better reflection of the will of the people, as compared to an indirectly elected upper house.
    Precedent of the Government of India Act, 1935: The Government of India Act, 1935, which served as a reference point, had established a unicameral legislature at the central level.
    Arguments Against a Single-Chamber Parliament:

    Checks and Balances: Critics argued that a bicameral system would provide an important system of checks and balances, preventing the concentration of power in the hands of a single chamber.
    Representation of Diverse Interests: An upper house could have ensured the representation of diverse interests, such as those of the states, minorities, and other marginalized groups.
    Deliberation and Scrutiny: A bicameral legislature would allow for more thorough deliberation and scrutiny of legislation, leading to better-quality laws.
    Precedent of Other Federal Democracies: Many other federal democracies, such as the United States and Australia, had adopted bicameral legislatures.
    Ultimately, the Constituent Assembly decided to opt for a single-chamber Parliament, the Lok Sabha, as the primary legislative body at the Union level. This decision has had several implications:

    Concentration of Power: The absence of an upper house has resulted in a greater concentration of power in the Lok Sabha and the Union government.
    Scrutiny and Deliberation: The lack of an upper house has been criticized for reducing the level of scrutiny and deliberation on legislation.
    Representation of States: The absence of an upper house has been seen by some as undermining the representation of states in the legislative process.
    However, the Indian Parliament has evolved over time, with the introduction of the Rajya Sabha as an indirectly elected upper house, which now plays a role in the legislative process, albeit with limited powers compared to the Lok Sabha.

    The decision to adopt a single-chamber Parliament, with its trade-offs, has been a significant aspect of the Indian constitutional framework, reflecting the unique political and historical context of the time.

    See less
Aisha Kapoor
  • 0
Aisha Kapoor
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Consider the choice between state-based citizenships and the adoption of a single, common citizenship for all Indians. What factors and discussions went into making this decision?

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Harish Sharma
    Harish Sharma Begginer

    The decision to adopt a single, common citizenship for all Indians, rather than state-based citizenships, was a significant and deliberate choice during the framing of the Indian Constitution. Here are the key considerations and debates surrounding this decision: Considerations for a Single, CommonRead more

    The decision to adopt a single, common citizenship for all Indians, rather than state-based citizenships, was a significant and deliberate choice during the framing of the Indian Constitution. Here are the key considerations and debates surrounding this decision:

    Considerations for a Single, Common Citizenship
    National Unity: A primary consideration was to foster a sense of national unity and integration. Given India’s vast diversity in terms of languages, cultures, and religions, a common citizenship was seen as a way to unite the country and strengthen national identity.

    Equality and Non-discrimination: A single citizenship ensures equal treatment of all citizens, regardless of the state in which they reside. This prevents discrimination based on state affiliation and promotes a sense of equality among all Indians.

    Simplification of Legal and Administrative Processes: Having a single citizenship simplifies legal and administrative processes. It eliminates the complexities and potential conflicts that could arise from multiple layers of citizenship and the corresponding legal rights and responsibilities.

    Mobility and Economic Integration: A common citizenship facilitates free movement of people across state borders, which is essential for economic integration and growth. It allows individuals to live, work, and conduct business anywhere in the country without facing state-based restrictions.

    Debates and Considerations Against State-based Citizenship
    Federal Autonomy: Critics of single citizenship argued that it could undermine the federal structure and the autonomy of states. They feared that centralization could erode the powers and identities of individual states.

    Diverse Identities: India’s states often have distinct linguistic and cultural identities. There were concerns that a single citizenship might not adequately respect or represent these diverse identities, leading to feelings of marginalization.

    Precedents from Other Countries: Some pointed to federal systems like the United States, where dual citizenship (state and federal) exists. They argued that state-based citizenship could enhance federalism by giving states more control over their affairs and the rights of their residents.

    Resolution and Final Decision
    Debates in the Constituent Assembly: During the Constituent Assembly debates, proponents of single citizenship, including Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, argued strongly for its necessity in maintaining national unity and preventing divisive regionalism. They emphasized the importance of having a unified nation where citizens are treated equally across all states.

    Balance of Federal and Unitary Features: The framers of the Constitution sought to balance federal and unitary features. While they opted for single citizenship, they also provided significant powers to the states and established a federal structure to ensure decentralization and respect for regional diversity.

    Acceptance of Diversity within Unity: The decision reflected an acceptance of India’s diversity within a framework of unity. The Constitution recognizes and protects linguistic, cultural, and regional identities through various provisions, while ensuring that all citizens have the same national identity and rights.

    Conclusion
    The choice of a single, common citizenship for all Indians was a conscious effort to build a cohesive and integrated nation-state. It aimed to foster national unity, ensure equality, simplify legal frameworks, and facilitate economic integration, while also balancing the need for federal autonomy and respect for regional identities. This decision remains a cornerstone of India’s constitutional framework, reflecting the country’s commitment to unity in diversity.

    See less
Eshan Nair
  • 0
Eshan NairBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine the provisions for amending the Constitution and the reasoning behind the different processes for amending different sections of the document. In what ways has the amendment process been applied throughout time?

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Suman Rajput
    Suman Rajput Begginer

    The Indian Constitution has a well-structured amendment process, which reflects the framers' intent to balance the need for stability and the flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances. The Constitution provides for varying amendment procedures for different parts, based on the rationale of protRead more

    The Indian Constitution has a well-structured amendment process, which reflects the framers’ intent to balance the need for stability and the flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances. The Constitution provides for varying amendment procedures for different parts, based on the rationale of protecting the core features of the document while allowing for necessary changes.

    The key provisions and rationale behind the amendment procedures are as follows:

    Simple Majority Amendment:
    These amendments can be made by a simple majority of the members present and voting in each House of Parliament.
    This procedure applies to matters of a routine or non-controversial nature, where the fundamental structure of the Constitution is not affected.
    Special Majority Amendment:
    This requires a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting in each House of Parliament.
    This procedure is applicable to a larger number of provisions, including the election of the President, the Supreme Court and High Court judges, and the powers of the Parliament and the state legislatures.
    The rationale is to ensure a broader consensus for amendments that have significant implications for the country’s governance and the distribution of powers.
    Constitutional Amendment with Ratification by States:
    This procedure requires a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting in each House of Parliament, along with the ratification by at least half of the state legislatures.
    This process applies to amendments that affect the federal structure of the Constitution, such as the representation of states in Parliament, the powers of the states, and the boundaries of the states.
    The rationale behind this higher threshold is to protect the interests of the states and the federal nature of the Constitution.
    The utilization of the amendment process over the years has been quite extensive, with the Constitution being amended more than a hundred times since its adoption in 1950. Some key observations:

    Frequency of Amendments:
    The Indian Constitution has been amended more frequently than many other constitutions, reflecting the need to adapt to the evolving socio-economic and political realities of the country.
    Scope of Amendments:
    Amendments have covered a wide range of issues, from fundamental rights and the structure of government to the addition of new states and the reorganization of existing ones.
    Controversial Amendments:
    Some amendments, such as the 42nd Amendment (the “Mini Constitution”) and the 99th Amendment (related to the National Judicial Appointments Commission), have been met with significant criticism and legal challenges.
    Protecting the Basic Structure:
    The Supreme Court has evolved the “basic structure doctrine,” which limits the Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution in a way that alters the basic features of the Constitution.
    Balancing Stability and Flexibility:
    The amendment process has generally been used to strike a balance between the need for stability and the flexibility to adapt the Constitution to the changing needs of the country.
    Overall, the Constitution’s amendment process has played a crucial role in maintaining the relevance and effectiveness of the document, while also ensuring that the core principles and values enshrined within it are protected. The varied amendment procedures have helped safeguard the federal structure and the fundamental rights of citizens, even as the Constitution has been periodically updated to address emerging challenges and societal transformations.

    See less
Dhruv Mehta
  • 0
Dhruv MehtaBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

Examine how the Constituent Assembly Debates influenced the development of India’s distinct federal model, which blends elements of the federal and unitary systems.

upsc: history of constitution
  1. Yashoda Maiya
    Yashoda Maiya Begginer

    The Constituent Assembly Debates played a pivotal role in shaping the unique Indian model of federalism, which combines features of both the unitary and federal systems. During the debates, there was extensive discussion on the appropriate form of government for the newly independent India. The framRead more

    The Constituent Assembly Debates played a pivotal role in shaping the unique Indian model of federalism, which combines features of both the unitary and federal systems.

    During the debates, there was extensive discussion on the appropriate form of government for the newly independent India. The framers of the Indian Constitution were influenced by the experiences of various federal democracies, such as the United States, Canada, and Australia, as well as the unitary system of the United Kingdom.

    The key aspects of the Indian federal model that emerged from the Constituent Assembly Debates include:

    Unitary Bias: While adopting a federal structure, the Constitution grants significant powers to the Union government, reflecting a unitary bias. For instance, the Union government has the power to create new states or alter the boundaries of existing states.
    Strong Center: The Indian federation is characterized by a strong central government with the President, Prime Minister, and Union Cabinet playing a dominant role. The Union government has exclusive jurisdiction over subjects like defense, foreign affairs, and macroeconomic policy.
    Integrated Judiciary: India has a unified judicial system with the Supreme Court at the apex, unlike the dual judiciary found in some other federal countries. This ensures uniformity in the interpretation and application of laws.
    Emergency Provisions: The Constitution empowers the Union government to declare emergencies, which can lead to the suspension of state autonomy and the centralization of decision-making authority.
    Cooperative Federalism: While the Indian model is tilted towards the Union, it also incorporates elements of cooperative federalism. This is reflected in the Concurrent List, which allows both the Union and states to legislate on subjects of shared interest.
    The Constituent Assembly debates witnessed intense discussions on the appropriate balance between the Union and the states. Ultimately, the framers opted for a federal structure with a strong unitary bias, which was seen as best suited to address India’s diversity, size, and the need for national integration in the post-independence era.

    This unique federal design has evolved over time, with the Supreme Court playing a crucial role in interpreting the constitutional provisions and maintaining the balance between the Union and the states.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: February 24, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (24 February 2025)

The rise of the work-from-home culture has brought about several ethical issues in private organizations. In this context, do you believe it is ethical for an employee to engage in moonlighting? Discuss. (Answer in 150 words) घर से काम करने ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

Indo-US Relation: Areas of Cooperation & Conflicts

Key Areas: Defense, technology, trade, energy, and regional cooperation. Key Areas of Cooperation 1. Defense and Security Transition from buyer-seller to co-production and technology sharing. India as a Major Defense Partner (MDP) and inclusion in STA-1. Access to advanced technologies, ...

On: February 22, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत-अमेरिका संबंध: सहयोग और संघर्ष के क्षेत्र

मुख्य विषय: भारत-अमेरिका संबंधों की मजबूती, विशेषकर रक्षा, प्रौद्योगिकी और क्षेत्रीय सहयोग में प्रगति। सहयोग के प्रमुख क्षेत्र 1. रक्षा एवं सुरक्षा सहयोग भारत और अमेरिका के बीच रक्षा संबंधों का विस्तार। प्रमुख रक्षा साझेदार (MDP) का दर्जा और STA-1 ...

Explore Our Blog