Model Answer

1. Fostering Inclusive Development

Compassionate governance ensures that marginalized groups such as rural poor, women, and children receive equal access to opportunities and government schemes. A prominent example is Ramesh Gholap, IAS, who through the initiative “Sarkar Aapke Dwar,” ensures that rural communities, particularly the disadvantaged, can access government schemes. This demonstrates how compassionate leadership bridges developmental gaps and improves the quality of life for vulnerable populations.

2. Building Social Cohesion

Compassion also plays a key role in promoting social cohesion and preventing conflicts. Civil servants like IAS officer Divya Devarajan in Telangana have worked compassionately with tribal communities to address grievances and ensure justice. Her efforts in resolving issues have fostered trust among the tribes, preventing tensions from escalating and enhancing social harmony.

3. Building Trust in Governance

Compassionate actions from civil servants strengthen the relationship between the government and its citizens. In Siaha district, IAS officer Bhupesh Chaudhary provided practical solutions to farmers’ issues, showing a genuine understanding of their needs. Such actions build trust in the government by demonstrating a commitment to the welfare of its people.

4. Fostering Sustainable Change

Beyond immediate relief, compassion leads to long-term solutions. Harshika Singh, IAS, in Madhya Pradesh, addressed deep-rooted issues like illiteracy and lack of opportunities for women. Her initiatives aimed at empowering women through education and skill-building highlight the importance of compassion in driving sustainable, transformative change.

In conclusion, compassion is a cornerstone of effective governance in India. It ensures the inclusion of marginalized communities, promotes social stability, and fosters long-term development.

Model Answer

The assertion that ethical principles cannot be universally applied to all peoples at all times is grounded in the concept of ethical relativism. This perspective argues that moral norms are shaped by cultural, historical, and contextual factors, leading to significant variations across societies.

Key Arguments Supporting Ethical Relativism

1. Context of Moral Norms: The morality of an action often depends on the societal norms where it occurs. Fact: For example, polygamy is accepted in some cultures but regarded as socially unacceptable in others, illustrating how the same action can have different moral implications based on cultural context.
2. Moral Pluralism: Within any given society, there exists a diversity of moral perspectives influenced by individual experiences, religions, and philosophies. Fact: Issues like abortion and euthanasia evoke varied ethical views, highlighting the complexity and plurality of moral beliefs even among individuals in the same community.
3. Conflicting Ethical Values: Ethical principles can conflict when analyzed together, complicating the notion of universal applicability. Fact: The debate between freedom of speech and hate speech prevention exemplifies the challenges in finding a universally acceptable ethical balance.
4. Agency of the Individual: Universal ethical principles may undermine individual autonomy. Fact: For instance, while moral principles often assert that taking a life is wrong, a person seeking euthanasia may have a different perspective, emphasizing the need for personal choice in moral dilemmas.

Counterarguments for Universal Ethical Principles

Despite the arguments for relativism, several ethical principles are considered universally applicable:

1. Respect for Human Dignity: The belief that all individuals possess inherent dignity and should be treated with respect is a universal concept. Fact: This principle transcends cultural boundaries and is foundational to human rights.
2. Sense of Justice: Fair treatment for all individuals, regardless of their status, is a common ethical tenet across cultures. Fact: The idea of justice is a uniform concept that resonates globally.
3. Honesty and Truthfulness: These values are widely recognized as essential for building stable societies. Fact: Honesty is universally understood as vital for trust and cooperation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while ethical relativism highlights the importance of cultural context and individual perspectives, certain ethical principles, such as respect for human dignity and justice, maintain universal relevance. Thus, while some ethical frameworks may vary, the existence of shared values suggests that not all ethical principles are context-dependent.