(i) Crisis of conscience (ii) Non-partisanship (iii) Dedication to public service (iv) Coercive corruption (v) Participative governance Roadmap for Answer Writing When addressing topics such as “Crisis of Conscience,” “Non-Partisanship,” “Dedication to Public Service,” “Coercive Corruption,” and “Participative Governance,” it’s essential to structure your answers clearly ...
Model Answer Introduction Moral intuition and moral reasoning are crucial cognitive processes that shape our moral judgments. While moral intuition serves as an immediate, emotion-driven response, moral reasoning involves a deliberate, rational analysis before reaching a moral decision. For instanceRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Moral intuition and moral reasoning are crucial cognitive processes that shape our moral judgments. While moral intuition serves as an immediate, emotion-driven response, moral reasoning involves a deliberate, rational analysis before reaching a moral decision. For instance, in a distressing situation, moral intuition may prompt immediate assistance, while moral reasoning assesses potential risks and benefits before deciding on the appropriate action.
Difference between Moral Intuition and Moral Reasoning
| Aspects | Moral Intuition | Moral Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Immediate and automatic judgment about right or wrong, often driven by emotions. | Deliberate process of determining right or wrong through logical analysis. |
| Characteristic | Often instantaneous, arising from gut feelings without conscious reasoning. | Involves conscious thought, applying moral principles and ethical theories. |
| Importance in Moral Judgments | Forms the immediate judgment that can later be analyzed through reasoning. | Justifies moral judgments and engages in moral discussions and debates. |
| Psychological Basis | Grounded in innate tendencies, shaped by culture and personal experiences. | Relies on cognitive processes and employs moral philosophies like utilitarianism or deontology. |
| Objectivity | Can be biased and influenced by personal prejudices, potentially leading to incorrect judgments. | Can be influenced by moral intuition but strives for objectivity through critical analysis. |
| Moral Development | Develops early in life, with children displaying basic moral intuitions. | Evolves with cognitive development and education, refining with maturity. |
Examples
- Moral Intuition:
- An instant feeling of disapproval upon witnessing someone steal, reflecting an immediate emotional response rather than a thoughtful evaluation.
- A spontaneous urge to donate to a charitable cause after hearing about a natural disaster, prompted by empathy and instinct.
- Moral Reasoning:
- Critically evaluating the implications of a policy on various stakeholders, making decisions based on principles of justice and fairness.
- Deliberating on the allocation of limited medical resources during a pandemic, considering equity and the greater good.
Conclusion
Moral intuition and moral reasoning are distinct yet interconnected processes guiding moral decision-making. While moral intuition acts as the instinctive compass, moral reasoning provides the necessary calibration. Understanding these processes fosters a comprehensive approach to ethical dilemmas, enhancing well-rounded moral judgment.
See less
Model Answer (i) Crisis of conscience What is a Crisis of Conscience? Conscience is a unique cognitive process that allows individuals to evaluate the morality of their actions. It emerges when the intellect judges the goodness or badness of a specific act, serving as a practical guide for human behRead more
Model Answer
(i) Crisis of conscience
What is a Crisis of Conscience?
Conscience is a unique cognitive process that allows individuals to evaluate the morality of their actions. It emerges when the intellect judges the goodness or badness of a specific act, serving as a practical guide for human behavior. However, when one’s conscience fails to provide moral direction due to conflicting experiences or pressures, it leads to what is termed a “crisis of conscience.”
Understanding the Crisis
A crisis of conscience manifests when individuals struggle to differentiate between right and wrong in a particular situation. This internal conflict can arise from various sources, such as societal expectations, personal values, or professional duties. As a result, individuals may feel disoriented or paralyzed, unable to make a morally sound decision.
Example: The Civil Servant’s Dilemma
Consider a civil servant instructed to evict squatters who have unlawfully occupied government land. In this scenario, the official faces a significant moral dilemma: should they comply with government orders and fulfill their duties, or should they listen to their conscience, which may advocate for compassion by allowing the squatters more time to evacuate? This example highlights how external pressures can clash with personal ethics, leading to a profound crisis of conscience.
Importance of Addressing the Crisis
Confronting a crisis of conscience is essential for maintaining personal integrity and ethical standards. Individuals may experience emotional distress, guilt, or anxiety when faced with these moral dilemmas, affecting their mental well-being and decision-making capabilities. Additionally, unresolved crises can have broader implications, such as eroding trust in public institutions and diminishing morale among colleagues.
In summary, a crisis of conscience represents a critical internal struggle that arises when individuals encounter ethical dilemmas. Recognizing and addressing these crises is vital for ethical decision-making, particularly in roles that carry significant moral responsibilities.
(ii) Non-partisanship
What is Non-Partisanship?
Non-partisanship refers to the principle that civil servants must perform their duties without bias or favoritism toward any political party, regardless of their personal beliefs or affiliations. This concept emphasizes political neutrality and impartiality in public service, ensuring that government officials prioritize their responsibilities above political considerations.
Key Aspects of Non-Partisanship
Importance of Non-Partisanship
Non-partisanship is vital for the integrity and effectiveness of public administration. It fosters a culture of accountability and trust, ensuring that government actions are based on fairness and equality rather than political bias. By adhering to non-partisan principles, civil servants contribute to a stable and functioning democracy, where policies and decisions serve the public interest without undue influence from political affiliations.
In summary, non-partisanship is a cornerstone of ethical public service, requiring civil servants to uphold constitutional values and execute their duties impartially, regardless of their personal political beliefs.
(iii) Dedication to public service
What is Dedication to Public Service?
Dedication to public service refers to a deep commitment and passion for serving the community and the nation, driven by an internal urge rather than external compulsion. In the context of civil services, this dedication aligns the individual with the principles of public good and welfare, emphasizing the importance of selfless service in governance.
Key Elements of Dedication
Example of Dedication
An illustrative example of dedication to public service is the IAS officer who worked tirelessly during the Kerala floods in 2019, despite not being on official duty. This officer exemplified selflessness and a commitment to the welfare of the affected communities, showcasing how dedication transcends formal responsibilities.
Importance of Dedication to Public Service
Dedication is crucial for building trust and credibility in governance. When civil servants demonstrate a genuine commitment to public service, it enhances public confidence in government institutions and promotes a culture of accountability and transparency. Ultimately, dedication to public service is fundamental for fostering a vibrant and responsive democracy, where the needs of the people are prioritized and addressed effectively.
(iv) Coercive corruption
What is Coercive Corruption?
Coercive corruption refers to a form of corruption where citizens are victims of extortion, feeling compelled to pay bribes to receive services they are already entitled to. This type of corruption undermines the rule of law and erodes public trust in government institutions, as individuals are forced to navigate a system rife with unethical practices.
Key Characteristics of Coercive Corruption
Consequences of Coercive Corruption
The impact of coercive corruption is profound, affecting not only individuals but also the broader society. Citizens who comply with corruption face immediate losses, such as wasted resources and lost opportunities. Fact: For instance, non-compliance with a government employee’s demands can lead to delays in service provision, lost wages, and increased harassment.
Importance of Addressing Coercive Corruption
Addressing coercive corruption is crucial for restoring integrity in public service. It requires a multifaceted approach, including legal reforms, public awareness, and robust enforcement mechanisms. By tackling coercive corruption, societies can promote ethical governance, enhance public trust, and ensure that citizens receive the services they are entitled to without the burden of extortion. Ultimately, combating this form of corruption is essential for fostering a just and equitable society.
(v) Participative governance
What is Participative Governance?
Participative governance is a democratic approach that enables citizens to have a voice in the formulation and implementation of policies that affect their lives. This involvement allows citizens to contribute to decision-making processes, ensuring that government actions align with the needs and preferences of the community.
Key Features of Participative Governance
Example: The MyGov Platform
An illustrative example of participative governance is the MyGov platform, launched by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology in India. This digital initiative encourages citizen participation by providing a space for individuals to share their views on government policies and services. Fact: Through MyGov, citizens can contribute ideas, participate in discussions, and engage with policymakers directly, enhancing transparency and accountability.
Importance of Participative Governance
Participative governance is crucial for building trust between citizens and the government. When citizens feel that their voices matter, they are more likely to support government initiatives and comply with policies. Fact: This collaborative approach not only improves policy outcomes but also strengthens democracy by fostering a culture of engagement and accountability.
In summary, participative governance empowers citizens to influence policy decisions, creates a responsive government, and enhances democratic practices. By facilitating active citizen engagement, governments can better address community needs and promote social cohesion.
See less