Home/upsc: dimensions of ethics
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
What is meant by 'environmental ethics? Why is it important to study? Discuss any one environmental issue from the viewpoint of environmental ethics. (150 words) [UPSC 2015]
Why is Environmental Ethics? Introduction Environmental ethics is the part of ethics that studies the relationship between people and their action with nature and its non-human components. It explores the ethics that shape our behaviors and choices regarding all living things — plants, animals, andRead more
Why is Environmental Ethics?
Introduction
Environmental ethics is the part of ethics that studies the relationship between people and their action with nature and its non-human components. It explores the ethics that shape our behaviors and choices regarding all living things — plants, animals, and ecosystems. The study of Environmental ethics is becoming more significant; as environmental degradation becomes a critical global issue. This article discusses what environmental ethics is, why we should study it, and examines one environmentalism problem from an ethical point of view: the destruction of tropical rainforests.
What is Environmental Ethics?
Environmental ethics is the study of the moral relationship between humans and the environment. It poses questions like: What are our obligations to the environment? How do we extend care to non-human entities? Nature: Its Value and Relation to Human Well-Being Environmental ethics aims to provide a way of thinking about how to make these decisions in a way that balances human needs and wants with the health of our planet.
There are various key ideas in environmental ethics:
A. Intrinsic Value: Nature has value independent of its utility to humans.
Instrumental Value: The value that nature has in relation to its usefulness to humans.
A stewardship role: A role of care and management of the environment given to humans.
Sustainability: The capacity to survive[e] without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Biocentrism: The concept that all living things possess equal and inherent value.
Anthropocentrism — the belief that human beings are the most important entity in the universe and that all other things are well only to the extent that they benefit humanity.
What is the Significance of Studying Environmental Ethics?
Shaping Decisions: Environmental ethics acts as a guiding principle for making decisions related to environmental policies, conservation activities, and sustainable practices. It allows a person or an entire society to weigh up the pros and cons and make their actions rightly according to their views.
Tackling Global Problems: Global society cannot afford to ignore so many environmental problems, including climate change, loss of biodiversity or pollution. Environmental ethics also provides some tools for figuring out what various stakeholders, individuals, corporations, governments, etc., should do about these problems.
Encouraging Sustainable Practices; Environmental ethics promote sustainable practices by highlighting the significance of sustainability. From waste minimization to resource conservation to ecosystem preservation,
Eradicating Pride from the Master Moral Actor: Environmental ethics instills in us a sense of empathy and respect for all life. It disrupts anthropocentrism and encourages a broader and more integrated view of environmental stewardship.
Legal and Policy Implications: A lot of environmental law and policy is premised on ethical basis. If environmental ethics is studied in course of time, it can help in formulation and implementation of laws for protection of environment and sustainable development.
The Destruction of Tropical Rainforests: A Case Study
Tropical rainforest is known as the lungs of the earth because they play a key role in producing oxygen and regulating the climate. But these ecosystems are threatened by deforestation, which be driven by logging, mining, and agriculture. Destruction of tropical rainforests raises a few issues from the perspective of environmental ethics:
Economic Value of Rainforests: You hear that rainforest is been endangered due to civilizations policies, cultivation and deforestation. Relatives of koalas who eat eucalyptus reside here as well, along with ghastly marsupials called devil dogs that I had never heard of and whose sole contribution to the ecosystem seems to be having facial tumors and fighting each other. For a biocentric conscience, these species have an inherent value and the right to exist, regardless of whether they are useful to humanity. Thus, deforestation is not just a biodiversity loss, but also a breach of the innate rights of these species to exist.
Climate Regulation: Rainforests play a critical role in climate regulation, storing vast amounts of carbon and influencing global weather patterns. These services are essential for human well-being and the health of the planet. From an anthropocentric point of view, why should we care? Because rainforests satisfy the basic material needs of many human beings and their destruction compromises the capacity of these ecosystems to provide these services with potentially wretched consequences for human societies.
Intergenerational Justice: The same is true for the global loss of rainforests. Ethically, we have to ask whether future generations deserve to be able to inherit a healthy planet full of biodiverse ecosystems. Intergenerational justice holds that present action cannot undermine future generations’ capacity to pursue their well-being.
Economic Disparities: Forests are mainly inhabited by indigenous populations, which are hit hard by deforestation. Environmental ethics demands that environmental benefits and burdens be fairly and equitably apportioned. These communities’ rights are often violated, and these inequalities are fueled by the extraction of resources from the rainforest for profit.
Responsibility and Accountability: A large number of different stakeholders (governments, corporations, consumers) are responsible for rainforest destruction, often making it difficult to determine who is to blame. Environmental ethics highlights the collective responsibility of these actors to preserve rainforests. It also makes them accountable for the environmental consequences of their actions.
Conclusion
Like all of these fields, environmental ethics is an important area of study because it provides the moral framework for understanding and acting responsibly in the environment. Environmental ethics guide us in making informed and responsible decisions by exploring the intrinsic and extrinsic value of the natural world, as well as the principles of stewardship and sustainability and examining the ethical implications of human behaviour. The ethical implications of conserving the tropical rainforest reflect not only the intrinsic importance of a species or species populations but also the life-enabling provision of ecosystem services, intergenerational justice, affluence and poverty, and collective responsibility. As it continues to deal with complex notions of environmental matters, the study of environmental ethics must be at the center of our answers to these questions.
See lessDifferentiate between the following : (1) Law and Ethics (ii) Ethical management and Management of ethics (iii) Discrimination and Preferential treatment (iv) Personal ethics and Professional ethics (200 words) [UPSC 2015]
Differentiation Between Key Concepts 1. Law and Ethics Law: Refers to the formal system of rules and regulations established by the government to maintain order and justice in society. Laws are enforceable by legal institutions, and violations result in legal consequences. For example, The PreventioRead more
Differentiation Between Key Concepts
1. Law and Ethics
2. Ethical Management and Management of Ethics
3. Discrimination and Preferential Treatment
4. Personal Ethics and Professional Ethics
Conclusion:
Understanding these distinctions is crucial for navigating various ethical and legal scenarios effectively. Laws provide the framework for societal order, while ethics guide personal and professional conduct beyond legal requirements. Ethical management ensures that ethical principles are embedded in organizational practices, while the management of ethics focuses on enforcing these principles through structured programs. Discrimination and preferential treatment address different aspects of fairness and equality, and personal and professional ethics guide behavior in different contexts.
See lessRefugees should not be turned back to the country where they would face persecution or human right violation. Examine the statement with reference to ethical dimension being violated by the nation claiming to be democratic with open society. (150 words) [UPSC 2021]
Ethical Implications of Refusing Refugees 1. Ethical Duty to Protect Refusing to accept refugees who face persecution or human rights violations in their home countries breaches the ethical duty of protection. Democracies, which pride themselves on upholding human rights, have a moral obligation toRead more
Ethical Implications of Refusing Refugees
1. Ethical Duty to Protect
Refusing to accept refugees who face persecution or human rights violations in their home countries breaches the ethical duty of protection. Democracies, which pride themselves on upholding human rights, have a moral obligation to offer asylum. For instance, Canada’s asylum policies reflect a commitment to human rights, prioritizing the safety of individuals fleeing persecution.
2. Violation of Human Rights
Turning away refugees often leads to a violation of basic human rights. The European Union’s 2015 refugee crisis highlighted how countries like Hungary and Poland faced criticism for their strict anti-refugee policies, which were seen as inconsistent with international human rights standards.
3. Moral Integrity of Democratic Nations
A nation claiming to be democratic and open must align its policies with moral integrity. Germany’s response to the Syrian refugee crisis, where it accepted over a million refugees, demonstrates a commitment to humanitarian values and ethical responsibility.
4. Upholding International Norms
International norms, such as those outlined in the 1951 Refugee Convention, emphasize the need for protection of refugees. Refusing asylum undermines these norms and the ethical framework of global cooperation and empathy.
In summary, democratic nations must adhere to ethical principles by providing refuge to those at risk of persecution, aligning their actions with their claimed values of human rights and moral integrity.
See lessWhat does “golden rule” imply? How is it different from the “golden mean”? Illustrate the difference with relevant examples?
The "golden rule" is a moral principle that suggests treating others the way you would want to be treated yourself. It is often expressed as "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." This principle emphasizes the importance of empathy, compassion, and reciprocity in human relationships anRead more
The “golden rule” is a moral principle that suggests treating others the way you would want to be treated yourself. It is often expressed as “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” This principle emphasizes the importance of empathy, compassion, and reciprocity in human relationships and interactions.
The golden rule is about how one should act towards others. It encourages individuals to consider the perspectives and needs of others, and to treat them with the same care and consideration that they would want for themselves. This principle is found in various forms across different religions, philosophies, and cultural traditions, and it is often seen as a fundamental tenet of ethical behavior.
Examples of the golden rule:
The “Golden Mean”:
The “golden mean” is a philosophical concept that emphasizes the importance of finding the right balance or moderation between two extremes. It suggests that the virtue or ideal lies in the middle, avoiding both excess and deficiency.
The golden mean is about finding the appropriate degree or level of a particular quality or behavior, rather than solely focusing on how one should treat others. It encourages individuals to seek a balance and avoid going to extremes, as the middle path is often considered the most prudent and virtuous.
See lessExplain the core features of ‘Virtue theory’ in ethics. What virtues do you think are sacrosanct for being a good administrator in India?
Virtue ethics, or virtue theory, is an approach to ethics that emphasizes the development of moral character and virtues as the key to ethical decision-making rather than focusing on rules or consequences. Here are the main tenets of virtue theory: Focus on Virtue: Virtue ethics places primary imporRead more
Virtue ethics, or virtue theory, is an approach to ethics that emphasizes the development of moral character and virtues as the key to ethical decision-making rather than focusing on rules or consequences. Here are the main tenets of virtue theory:
In the context of administration in India, several virtues are particularly essential for administrators to effectively serve the public interest and uphold ethical standards: