Model Answer

Ethical Lessons from Ashoka’s Life

Ashoka, the Mauryan emperor, is celebrated for his transformative journey from a ruthless conqueror to a benevolent ruler. The Indian Republic’s adoption of Ashoka’s Lion Capital at Sarnath as its state emblem symbolizes his commitment to harmony and compassion, resonating with modern India’s ethical ideals.

Self-Transformation

One of the most profound lessons from Ashoka’s life is the capacity for self-transformation through introspection. His change from a violent ruler after the Kalinga War to an advocate for peace illustrates the importance of self-awareness and accountability. This encourages individuals and organizations to reflect on their actions and strive for personal growth (Basham, 1954).

Equality and Justice

Ashoka’s establishment of one of the earliest welfare states underscores the principles of fairness and justice. His concept of ‘Dhamma’ emphasized that the state’s primary goal should be the well-being of its citizens, advocating for dignity and equality. This vision remains relevant today as societies strive for social justice (Sharma, 2002).

Tolerance and Acceptance

Ashoka’s reign exemplified tolerance towards diverse religions and viewpoints, fostering an inclusive society. His commitment to peaceful coexistence resonates with contemporary discussions on free speech and acceptance, highlighting the need for harmonious coexistence among different communities (Radhakrishnan, 1936).

Diplomacy and Peaceful Coexistence

After the Kalinga War, Ashoka prioritized diplomacy, maintaining treaties with five Greek rulers to promote peaceful relations. This approach inspired India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and continues to influence modern diplomatic strategies (Nehru, 1946).

Compassion and Empathy

Ashoka’s emphasis on compassion extended to animals, advocating for their rights and humane treatment. His establishment of hospitals and welfare initiatives reflects a commitment to benevolence and nonviolence, values that are increasingly vital in today’s world (Khan, 2015).

Humanity and Humility

Ashoka’s initiatives, including building hospitals and providing public amenities, demonstrate his humility and dedication to serving his people. His actions remind us of the importance of community service and ethical governance.

Ashoka’s life and teachings continue to inspire modern India, guiding its principles of ‘Satyamev Jayate’ (truth always triumphs) as the nation aspires to be courageous, proud, and influential.

Model Answer

Introduction

To make ethical decisions, it is essential to possess both awareness (consciousness) and an internal moral compass (conscience). While consciousness enables individuals to recognize their environment and situations, conscience guides them in acting according to what is morally right or wrong.

Examples of Consciousness and Conscience in Action

1. Healthcare Professionals
   • For a doctor in a hospital, consciousness involves awareness of available resources, such as emergency medicines. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many doctors faced the ethical dilemma of allocating limited resources. Their conscience guided them to prioritize patients based on medical need rather than personal biases, demonstrating the importance of ethical decision-making in high-stakes situations.
2. Civil Servants
   • Civil servants often navigate ethical dilemmas, such as balancing public interest against personal gain. For instance, a civil servant may need to choose between implementing a policy that benefits the majority or one that supports a marginalized group. Here, both consciousness and conscience are crucial for making decisions that uphold societal welfare.
3. Journalism
   • Journalists must be conscious of the significance of the news they report and verify their facts. Their conscience compels them to maintain fairness and impartiality, even when under pressure to sensationalize stories. Adhering to ethical standards is vital for preserving public trust.
4. Sports Ethics
   • In sports, athletes must be aware of the rules and spirit of fair play. However, their conscience should prevent them from engaging in unethical practices, such as using performance-enhancing drugs, despite external pressures to succeed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, consciousness and conscience together play a vital role in ethical decision-making. By fostering both awareness and a moral sense, individuals can navigate complex ethical dilemmas more effectively, ensuring their actions align with societal values and personal ethics.

Model Answer

Introduction

The principle of double effect serves as a significant ethical guideline for resolving complex moral dilemmas, particularly when actions yield both positive and negative outcomes. This principle posits that if an individual intends to achieve a morally good goal, they may permissibly cause harm as a side effect, provided certain conditions are met.

Key Conditions of the Principle

1. The Nature of the Act: The action must be morally good or neutral. For instance, a firefighter risking his life to save trapped residents exemplifies a morally commendable act despite the potential for personal harm. This reflects the self-sacrificial nature of heroic actions (Aquinas, 13th century).
2. Proportionality Condition: The positive outcome must outweigh the negative effect. Military operations aimed at neutralizing organized crime often lead to collateral damage; however, these operations can be justified if they significantly enhance public safety (McMahan, 2009).
3. Means-End Condition: The harmful means should not be necessary for achieving the good effect. For example, a doctor administering heavy painkillers to alleviate a patient’s suffering may foresee a reduction in the patient’s lifespan, yet their primary intention is to relieve pain (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013).
4. Right-Intention Condition: The intention should solely focus on the good outcome. In self-defense situations, an individual might unintentionally kill an assailant, but the primary aim is to protect oneself (Luban, 2010).

Ethical Implications and Misunderstandings

While the principle is instrumental in navigating moral complexities, it can be misinterpreted as a justification for harm under the guise of good intentions. Ethical agents must strive to minimize negative side effects and act responsibly, adhering to the principle’s restrictions against excessive or unjust actions. Thus, the principle of double effect provides a nuanced framework for evaluating actions’ moral dimensions, guiding individuals through ethically challenging scenarios.