Roadmap for Answer Writing Introduction Define the concept of non-performance of duty by public servants. State your position: Agree that it is a form of corruption. Briefly mention the implications of this view. Body Justify your agreement with specific points and examples. A. Breach of Trust Point: Public ...
Model Answer Introduction Social audit is a vital process that assesses, monitors, and evaluates public services and programs by involving citizens and civil society organizations. It promotes transparency, accountability, and good governance, making it essential across all spheres of public serviceRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
Social audit is a vital process that assesses, monitors, and evaluates public services and programs by involving citizens and civil society organizations. It promotes transparency, accountability, and good governance, making it essential across all spheres of public service, including the judiciary.
The Role of Social Audits in Various Sectors
Judiciary
An independent and empowered social audit mechanism is crucial in the judiciary to ensure performance and ethical conduct. Mechanisms such as judicial review and transparency initiatives enable public scrutiny of judicial decisions. For instance, evaluating delays in case disposal and transparency in the appointment of judges can enhance accountability. Public trust in the judiciary can be significantly improved through regular assessments of judicial conduct.
Public Services
In India, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) exemplifies successful social auditing. The act incorporates social audits that allow citizens and civil society organizations to verify the work undertaken, wages paid, and overall effectiveness of the rural employment guarantee scheme. This participatory approach ensures high levels of accountability and public involvement in governance.
Healthcare
The Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram (JSSK) in India utilizes social audits to monitor maternal and child health services. Community participation enables citizens to assess service availability, infrastructure, and the behavior of healthcare professionals. Such initiatives lead to improved health outcomes and greater public confidence in healthcare services.
Education
The Right to Education Act (RTE) mandates School Management Committees (SMCs) to conduct social audits, focusing on teacher attendance, mid-day meal programs, and educational infrastructure. By involving parents and community representatives, these audits promote accountability and ensure that educational policies are implemented effectively.
Public Infrastructure Projects
The Swachh Bharat Mission (Clean India Mission) incorporates social audits to evaluate sanitation initiatives. Community members inspect toilet construction and usage, assessing program effectiveness and identifying discrepancies, thus ensuring transparency and accountability.
Conclusion
Independent and empowered social audit mechanisms are essential across all public service sectors, including the judiciary. They promote the efficient delivery of services while ensuring transparency and accountability. In the judiciary, such mechanisms enhance ethical conduct and public trust in the institution, ultimately fostering a more responsible governance framework.
See less
Model Answer Introduction The non-performance of duty by a public servant can indeed be viewed as a form of corruption. This perspective stems from the violation of accountability principles and the breach of public trust that results when public servants fail to fulfill their responsibilities. SuchRead more
Model Answer
Introduction
The non-performance of duty by a public servant can indeed be viewed as a form of corruption. This perspective stems from the violation of accountability principles and the breach of public trust that results when public servants fail to fulfill their responsibilities. Such failures not only hinder the public interest but also deny citizens their rightful entitlements. Therefore, I agree that non-performance of duty constitutes a form of corruption.
Body
Breach of Trust
Public servants are entrusted with specific duties to serve the public interest. When they neglect their responsibilities, it represents a breach of that trust. For example, in the Delhi gang-rape case (2012), a police officer’s failure to act promptly resulted in a significant breach of public trust, highlighting the dire consequences of non-performance (BBC News, 2012).
Wasting Public Resources
Non-performance often leads to the ineffective use of public resources. The Commonwealth Games scam (2010) is a stark example, where funds allocated for infrastructure were misused, resulting in cost overruns and substandard construction (The Hindu, 2010).
Hindering Progress and Development
Failure to perform duties can obstruct societal progress. The delayed Mumbai Metro Line 2A project exemplifies this issue, where bureaucratic inefficiencies caused significant delays, hampering essential transportation development (Times of India, 2020).
Facilitating Corruption
Non-performance can create an environment conducive to corruption. The Vyapam scam (2013), where government officials manipulated entrance exams, illustrates how negligence in duty can lead to bribery and irregular admissions (The Indian Express, 2013).
Violation of Legal and Ethical Obligations
Public servants are bound by legal and ethical standards. The 2G spectrum scam (2008) showed how officials violated regulations in allocating telecom licenses, resulting in enormous financial losses for the government (The Economic Times, 2012).
Conclusion
The non-performance of duty by civil servants is indeed a form of corruption, with profound implications for public trust and resource allocation. It is crucial to foster greater accountability and integrity within public service to ensure that civil servants diligently fulfill their responsibilities in serving the public interest.
See less