The amendment process in the Indian Constitution is quite flexible compared to the rigid system in the United States and the more fluid approach in the United Kingdom.

India: The Indian Constitution can be amended through a special majority in Parliament, with some amendments requiring ratification by at least half of the state legislatures. This allows for relatively easier changes while ensuring broad consensus.

United States:  The U.S. Constitution has a very rigid amendment process. An amendment requires a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures. This high threshold makes amendments rare and difficult to achieve.

United Kingdom: The UK has no formal written constitution, so its laws and principles can be amended more flexibly. Changes can be made through simple Acts of Parliament, reflecting the UK’s reliance on parliamentary sovereignty and the evolving nature of its legal framework.

In summary, India strikes a balance with a process that is neither as stringent as the U.S. nor as flexible as the UK, allowing for adaptability while maintaining stability.