We live in a society where in public, we talk about women’s empowerment and how to support women, but in our own homes, we do not allow them to stay late outside at night or get into their field of ...
Arundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things" delves deeply into the intricacies of casteism, societal norms, and family dynamics within the South Asian context, offering a poignant critique through its narrative and characters. Casteism The novel vividly portrays the brutal realities of the caste systeRead more
Arundhati Roy’s “The God of Small Things” delves deeply into the intricacies of casteism, societal norms, and family dynamics within the South Asian context, offering a poignant critique through its narrative and characters.
Casteism
The novel vividly portrays the brutal realities of the caste system in India, particularly through the character of Velutha, an untouchable (Dalit). His relationship with Ammu, a woman from a higher caste, becomes a central conflict. The forbidden love between them underscores the harshness of caste barriers. Roy writes, “He held her as though she was a gift. Given to him in love. Something still and small. Unbearably precious” (Roy, “The God of Small Things”). This quote illustrates the purity and innocence of their love, starkly contrasted against the societal condemnation it attracts. Editorial reviews, such as one from The Guardian, highlight how Roy “lays bare the devastating impacts of caste oppression” through these relationships.
Societal Norms
Roy also critiques rigid societal norms, especially those governing gender and sexuality. Ammu’s plight as a divorced woman in a conservative society showcases the limited agency of women. Her independence and defiance are met with severe repercussions, reflecting societal constraints. The narrative states, “Perhaps it’s true that things can change in a day. That a few dozen hours can affect the outcome of whole lifetimes.” This suggests how swiftly societal norms can destroy lives when defied.
Family Dynamics
The complexities of family dynamics are explored through the fractured Ipe family. The relationships between the twins, Estha and Rahel, their mother Ammu, and other family members highlight themes of love, loyalty, and betrayal. The tragic drowning of Sophie Mol acts as a catalyst that exposes underlying tensions and unresolved traumas within the family. Roy’s depiction of the family’s interactions reflects the oppressive weight of tradition and expectation. As noted in a review by The New York Times, the novel “masterfully examines the entanglement of personal histories and collective memory within a family.”
Analogies
Roy employs rich analogies and metaphors to deepen the exploration of these themes. For instance, the river that flows through Ayemenem is a recurring symbol of the undercurrents of history and memory that shape the characters’ lives. “The river of her childhood, the river that smelled of shit and pesticides bought with World Bank loans” (Roy), symbolizes both natural beauty and human corruption, mirroring the duality of societal progress and regression.
Editorial reviews consistently praise Roy’s ability to weave these themes into a compelling narrative. The Los Angeles Times calls it “a novel of poignancy and power,” highlighting how Roy’s lyrical prose and intricate storytelling bring these societal critiques to life.
In summary, “The God of Small Things” is a profound exploration of casteism, societal norms, and family dynamics in South Asia. Through its vivid characters, poignant narrative, and rich symbolism, the novel offers a powerful critique of the entrenched social hierarchies and cultural expectations that shape individual destinies.
See less
First and most importantly, no. It is not okay or justifiable by any means. If we trace the evolution of gender roles in society we'll observe that there was a point in history when men and women were equals, women were scholars, artisans, philosophers, etc. We cannot pinpoint a certain event when wRead more
First and most importantly, no. It is not okay or justifiable by any means.
If we trace the evolution of gender roles in society we’ll observe that there was a point in history when men and women were equals, women were scholars, artisans, philosophers, etc. We cannot pinpoint a certain event when women started being treated as inferior.
The belief that humankind has today, is that society is inherently patriarchal. This belief at present may not be blatantly obvious. But it can be seen in instances like the one you mentioned.
There has been some positive development in the perception of traditional gender roles in our country, but we are still a ways behind the idealistic reality we all chase.
The hope is, that one day men will be taught again to protect women and not harm them. And that women feel safe no matter the time or place because basic respect and decency should be the same for all persons regardless of gender, sexuality, caste, race, or any other category where differences may arise.
Hope this answers your question.
See less