How does Quit India movement differ from Non -Cooperation movement in the terms of its objectives,outcomes and strategies?
Home/indian movement importance
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
Here's a breakdown of the key differences between the Quit India Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement: Objectives: Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922): This aimed to achieve swaraj (self-rule) for India through non-violent resistance. It focused on withdrawing cooperation from the British goveRead more
Here’s a breakdown of the key differences between the Quit India Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement:
Objectives:
Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922): This aimed to achieve swaraj (self-rule) for India through non-violent resistance. It focused on withdrawing cooperation from the British government by boycotting British goods, educational institutions, and legal systems.
Quit India Movement (1942): This demanded an immediate British withdrawal from India. It aimed for complete independence, not just self-rule within the British Empire.
Outcomes:
Non-Cooperation Movement: The movement was called off due to the Chauri Chaura incident where a police station was burnt down by protestors. While it did not achieve immediate independence, it did:
Quit India Movement: The movement was met with brutal suppression by the British. However, it did:
Strategies:
Non-Cooperation Movement: This movement relied on non-violent protests, boycotts, and strikes. It aimed to disrupt the British administration and economy through peaceful means.
Quit India Movement: This movement had a more confrontational approach. While still advocating for non-violence, it aimed for mass civil disobedience and potentially a large-scale uprising against British rule.
In essence, the Non-Cooperation Movement was a more cautious step towards self-rule, while the Quit India Movement was a bolder call for immediate independence. The Non-Cooperation Movement focused on non-violent protest and boycotts, while the Quit India Movement was open to the possibility of a more widespread uprising.