In "Jane Eyre," Charlotte Brontë intricately explores themes of social class and gender inequality, profoundly influencing the protagonist's development and relationships. Jane Eyre, an orphan of low social status, faces constant discrimination and hardship due to her class and gender. Her struggleRead more
In “Jane Eyre,” Charlotte Brontë intricately explores themes of social class and gender inequality, profoundly influencing the protagonist’s development and relationships. Jane Eyre, an orphan of low social status, faces constant discrimination and hardship due to her class and gender. Her struggle for self-respect and independence in a rigid, patriarchal society forms the core of her journey.
Social Class: Jane’s low social standing subjects her to maltreatment from characters like her Aunt Reed and the wealthy students at Lowood School. Despite her intelligence and moral fortitude, her class limits her opportunities, compelling her to work as a governess—a position that isolates her between the servant class and the gentry. Her relationship with Mr. Rochester highlights these class tensions, as she navigates the power imbalance between them. Jane’s insistence on maintaining her dignity and moral principles, despite her love for Rochester, underscores her resistance to being subjugated by class norms.
Gender Inequality: The novel also critiques gender roles and the limited options available to women. Jane’s desire for equality and self-expression challenges the expectations of women in her time. Her interactions with strong female characters like Helen Burns and Miss Temple influence her belief in moral integrity and intellectual equality. Moreover, her rejection of St. John Rivers’ proposal, which demands her submission to his rigid expectations, further emphasizes her quest for autonomy.
Through Jane’s experiences, Brontë advocates for a society where one’s worth is determined by character and intellect rather than social class or gender, ultimately portraying Jane’s development as a testament to personal strength and resilience against societal constraints.
See less
Marxist literary criticism interprets the relationship between literature and society through the lens of class struggle, economic disparity, and the socio-economic forces that shape both. In George Orwell's "1984," these themes are evident in the rigid class structure and the pervasive control exerRead more
Marxist literary criticism interprets the relationship between literature and society through the lens of class struggle, economic disparity, and the socio-economic forces that shape both. In George Orwell’s “1984,” these themes are evident in the rigid class structure and the pervasive control exerted by the Party. The society depicted is divided between the ruling Party and the oppressed proles. The Party, especially the Inner Party, represents the bourgeoisie, controlling resources, information, and power, while the proles are kept in ignorance and poverty, rendering them powerless. Economic disparity is a central theme, with the proles living in deprivation and the Inner Party enjoying luxuries, highlighting the unequal distribution of wealth and resources. This disparity underscores the Marxist critique of capitalism, where the ruling class thrives at the expense of the working masses. The Party’s manipulation of language and truth through doublethink and Newspeak, along with the use of surveillance and ideological control, reflects Marxist ideas about how ruling classes maintain dominance. Winston’s failed rebellion and the Party’s control over supposed revolutionary groups illustrate the difficulties of overthrowing entrenched power structures. Through a Marxist lens, “1984” critiques totalitarianism and explores power, control, and resistance within a stratified society.
See less