Home/british india
- Recent Questions
- Most Answered
- Answers
- No Answers
- Most Visited
- Most Voted
- Random
- Bump Question
- New Questions
- Sticky Questions
- Polls
- Followed Questions
- Favorite Questions
- Recent Questions With Time
- Most Answered With Time
- Answers With Time
- No Answers With Time
- Most Visited With Time
- Most Voted With Time
- Random With Time
- Bump Question With Time
- New Questions With Time
- Sticky Questions With Time
- Polls With Time
- Followed Questions With Time
- Favorite Questions With Time
Impact of British in Post- Independence India
With far reaching and long term effects on the deindustrialization of the subcontinent, this has been the working role of British economic policies in India. Major Policies Leading to Deindustrialization Bias Toward British Commodities: -British manufactured commodities were supported by Free TradeRead more
With far reaching and long term effects on the deindustrialization of the subcontinent, this has been the working role of British economic policies in India.
Major Policies Leading to Deindustrialization
Bias Toward British Commodities:
-British manufactured commodities were supported by Free Trade Policies of the British East India Company and the Crown. Indian industries, and in particular the textile, were most poorly and even inadequately protected from cheaper imported British commodities flooding into the Indian market.
Indian products were less competitive in global markets since they were high tariffed as they entered the British market.
-Exportation of raw materials:
To this end, India was developed into an industrial supplying nation of raw materials for industrial production in Britain, since it was the source of such raw materials as cotton, indigo, jute, etc. India as a home to manufacture was discouraged by these raw material productivities.
-Destruction of Traditional Industries:
Through their direct and indirect policies, British destroyed traditional Indian industries – textiles, handicrafts and shipbuilding in the east. This included:
Undercutting of Indian markets by cheaper British goods: This is what has been discussed above.
The British disrupted traditional supply chains – cast iron instead of glass, lead and steel replaced precious metals like silver and gold, artisans and craftsmen’s livelihoods were disrupted.
-There was absolutely no help or support from the British for the growth of Indian industries.
-Long-Term Implications:
Deindustrialization was extremely associated with India’s economic backwardness post independence. As a result, the economy failed because of a lack a strong industrial base which impeded growth and development.
-High dependence on Agriculture: Large part of the population was dependent on agriculture, so that the economy was vulnerable to droughts and other shocks of the agriculture.
Deindustrialization had some social and political consequences. Social unrest was produced and served as a fire for the nationalist movement against the British rule.
See lessImpact of British in Post- Independence India
British economic strategies in India played a pivotal role in the deindustrialization process by prioritizing the export of raw materials and hindering local manufacturing through the implementation of tariffs and infrastructure projects that were geared towards extraction rather than industrial expRead more
British economic strategies in India played a pivotal role in the deindustrialization process by prioritizing the export of raw materials and hindering local manufacturing through the implementation of tariffs and infrastructure projects that were geared towards extraction rather than industrial expansion. Consequently, this resulted in the decline of India’s once-thriving textile and handicraft sectors, displacing skilled craftsmen and fostering a reliance on Britain for economic sustenance. The long-lasting effects of these policies included a diminished industrial foundation in India following independence, which impeded efforts towards economic diversification and technological advancement.
Socially, the policies disrupted traditional means of livelihood and exacerbated poverty, setting the stage for future economic hardships. Ultimately, British policies solidified India’s role as a supplier of raw materials and a consumer of British products, shaping its economic landscape for years to come and leaving behind a legacy of industrial stagnation and reliance.
See lessModern History
The Bhoodan (land gift) and Gramdan (village gift) movements, initiated by Acharya Vinoba Bhave in post-independence India, aimed to address rural poverty, inequality, and promote social justice through voluntary land reforms. The objectives of these movements were multi-faceted: 1. **RedistributionRead more
The Bhoodan (land gift) and Gramdan (village gift) movements, initiated by Acharya Vinoba Bhave in post-independence India, aimed to address rural poverty, inequality, and promote social justice through voluntary land reforms.
The objectives of these movements were multi-faceted:
1. **Redistribution of Land:** Bhoodan aimed to persuade wealthy landowners to voluntarily donate a portion of their land to landless farmers, thereby reducing landlessness and promoting economic equity.
2. **Village Self-Sufficiency:* Gramdan sought to achieve collective ownership and management of village resources, including land, water, and forests, to foster self-governance and sustainable development at the grassroots level.
3. **Social Transformation:** Both movements aimed to promote Gandhian principles of non-violence and self-reliance, encouraging a decentralized and egalitarian socio-economic structure in rural India.
The success of these movements was mixed:
– **Achievements:** They sparked significant public interest and received substantial support from rural communities and some landowners. Several lakh acres of land were donated under Bhoodan, benefiting numerous landless families.
– **Challenges:** However, challenges such as lack of follow-through in actual land distribution, bureaucratic hurdles, and resistance from vested interests limited their impact. The Gramdan concept faced implementation difficulties due to legal complexities and varying interpretations of collective ownership.
In conclusion, while the Bhoodan and Gramdan movements contributed to raising awareness about land reforms and rural development, their lasting success in achieving comprehensive socio-economic transformation remained constrained by practical challenges and systemic barriers.
See less