Which amendment has been the most controversial till date?
The 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution, enacted in 1976, had significant implications on the balance of power between the central and state governments. Often referred to as a "mini-Constitution," it made extensive changes that strengthened the central government at the expense of state autonRead more
The 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution, enacted in 1976, had significant implications on the balance of power between the central and state governments. Often referred to as a “mini-Constitution,” it made extensive changes that strengthened the central government at the expense of state autonomy.
One of the major changes was the addition of the words “Socialist” and “Secular” to the Preamble, reinforcing the central government’s ideological direction. The amendment also curtailed the power of the judiciary, making it more difficult to challenge central laws and diminishing the states’ ability to contest central overreach.
Furthermore, the amendment transferred several subjects from the State List to the Concurrent List, allowing the central government greater legislative control over areas traditionally managed by states. This shift in legislative power further centralized authority, reducing the autonomy of state governments.
In essence, the 42nd Amendment significantly tilted the balance of power towards the center, weakening the federal structure of India. It created a more centralized form of governance, which has had lasting effects on the relationship between the central and state governments.
See less
One of the most controversial amendments to the Indian Constitution was the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976.The 42nd Amendment Act was contentious for its perceived erosion of democratic principles and fundamental rights, sparking widespread debate and criticism. Subsequent amendments and judicial interpRead more
One of the most controversial amendments to the Indian Constitution was the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976.The 42nd Amendment Act was contentious for its perceived erosion of democratic principles and fundamental rights, sparking widespread debate and criticism. Subsequent amendments and judicial interpretations have sought to restore the original balance of powers and uphold the core values of the Indian Constitution. This amendment was passed during the period of Emergency declared in 1975-1977 and introduced several significant changes:
1. **Fundamental Rights**: It altered the balance between fundamental rights and directive principles, asserting that the directive principles could override fundamental rights, which led to concerns about potential erosion of civil liberties.
2. **Constitutional Amendments**: The amendment restricted the Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution by requiring amendments related to the basic structure of the Constitution to be approved by a two-thirds majority and ratified by half of the state legislatures.
3. **Emergency Provisions**: It extended the duration of the emergency provisions and empowered the government to suspend fundamental rights during emergencies, which raised concerns about authoritarianism and abuse of power.
4. **Judicial Review**: The amendment curtailed the scope of judicial review, limiting the Supreme Court’s ability to review constitutional amendments, which was seen as undermining the independence of the judiciary.
5. **State Governments**: It increased the power of the central government over state governments, leading to fears of centralization and weakening of federalism.
One of the most controversial amendments to the Indian Constitution was the **42nd Amendment Act of 1976**. This amendment was passed during the period of Emergency declared in 1975-1977 and introduced several significant changes:
1. **Fundamental Rights**: It altered the balance between fundamental rights and directive principles, asserting that the directive principles could override fundamental rights, which led to concerns about potential erosion of civil liberties.
2. **Constitutional Amendments**: The amendment restricted the Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution by requiring amendments related to the basic structure of the Constitution to be approved by a two-thirds majority and ratified by half of the state legislatures.
3. **Emergency Provisions**: It extended the duration of the emergency provisions and empowered the government to suspend fundamental rights during emergencies, which raised concerns about authoritarianism and abuse of power.
4. **Judicial Review**: The amendment curtailed the scope of judicial review, limiting the Supreme Court’s ability to review constitutional amendments, which was seen as undermining the independence of the judiciary.
5. **State Governments**: It increased the power of the central government over state governments, leading to fears of centralization and weakening of federalism.
See less