Although it has its benefits, AI in strategic management can never substitute the human aspect of this complicated profession.

1: Strategy-making requires creativity and intuition

• In their quest to solve a given problem, AI, no matter how advanced it is, will be able only to conduct some data analysis and identify particular patterns but be able to only seek where the problem is.
• Strategists are capable of not only looking at everything but also out of the particular box.

2: Strategy-making involves considering multiple perspectives and inputs

• The people strategists work with are usually cross-functional and allergic to working in silos. They can be in the same project to help understand other aspects of the project.
• AI is inherently limited in its programming and data inputs, making it hard for it to appreciate subtle social and interpersonal dynamics.

3. Strategy-making often deals with rather complicated and extreme ethical and social issues.

• When it comes to strategizing, who has a better grasp of the people’s approach to the problem is as well as what is at stake, the strategist or the AI? The answer is, the human.
• Although the assessment AHASA was intended for AA programs, there are social and value-based factors as well that AI is able to assess.

4: Strategy-making is an area of turbulent change and continuity.

• Most importantly analysts are people with strategic and creative thought by nature and as a result will have the capacity to develop appropriate response.
• Because AI has limitations such as data that is not much in volume and variety from human inputs which is all there is at the current time, can not make the necessary changes.