Home/World History/World After 1945/Page 3
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
How did Margaret Thatcher win the Cold War?
There are those who would say that Margaret Thatcher fought the cold war, or contributed towards a lot the ending of this war, but did not win the cold war by herself. Her outspoken anti-Soviet stance and her relationship with US President Ronald Reagan at the time actually strengthened the anti-SovRead more
There are those who would say that Margaret Thatcher fought the cold war, or contributed towards a lot the ending of this war, but did not win the cold war by herself. Her outspoken anti-Soviet stance and her relationship with US President Ronald Reagan at the time actually strengthened the anti-Soviet coalition.
Mrs. Thatcher’s economic principles, together with a certain degree of tolerance for individual liberties, sent a welcome ripple across Eastern Europe. She openly endorsed the democratic movements and did not shy away from instances of active confrontation with the Soviet influence that sought to maintain the so-called ‘Iron Curtain’.
Moreover, she also enjoyed a good rapport with the leader of the former Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev which facilitated harmonious relations between two rival superpowers in a way that caused the breakup of the Soviet Union and therefore the cold war.
See lessHow did the Cold War impact the political landscape of non-aligned countries? 125 Words
Hence the Cold War had its influence to the non-aligned countries' political system. The countries that did not want to take stands for United States or USSR were the theatres of proxy wars. They were the vulnerable nations to super powers in the competition for their domination through economical hRead more
Hence the Cold War had its influence to the non-aligned countries’ political system. The countries that did not want to take stands for United States or USSR were the theatres of proxy wars. They were the vulnerable nations to super powers in the competition for their domination through economical help and military aids and politics. This led to civil strife, political turbulence, and slow or nonexistent growth.
Although non-aligned countries meant to be neutral they were often dragged into the cold war camp. These tendencies to take sides and allied geopolitical effect translated to their domestic politics and foreign policies.
See lesswhy were the third world countries joining and signing Treaties like NATO, SEATO etc., not treated as a threat to the whole concept of Third world order?
An assembly to NATO or SEATO and the Third World membership appears an irony given that the Non-Aligned Movement might have been seeking to be independent from the domination of Cold War superpowers’ alliances. Nevertheless, the following factors account for the alignments without compromising the tRead more
An assembly to NATO or SEATO and the Third World membership appears an irony given that the Non-Aligned Movement might have been seeking to be independent from the domination of Cold War superpowers’ alliances. Nevertheless, the following factors account for the alignments without compromising the third world order.
1. Strategic Survival: Some of these emerging nations had domestic problems, some had border issues or even had to confront neighboring nations. Becoming a member of SEATO or CENTO ensured military security as well as defense, which was the basic need in that era.
2. Economic Incentives: Aid was provided accordingly to the beautiful envelopes of the alliances of the superpowers. Poorest of the countries got involved in either of the two camps for money, developing infrastructures or military backup.
3. Pragmatic Non-Alignment: Therefore some of the Third World countries did not fully adhere to the principles of NAM. Most followed a policy of ‘operative non-alignment,’ regularly participating in the affairs of super(power) blocs but at the same time insisting on an independent policy in other respects.
4. Internal Political Pressures: In the domestic political arrangements, leaderships would tend to group based on their ideological valuess or in order to wield power within the home country to the detriment of the principles of NAM.
5. Limited Global Influence: The Third World order did not accumulate enough coherent institutional support. Thus, the decision to join treatises was not altering, at the individual country level, with the spirit of non-alignment, which provided the common framework.
These treaties were a result of a cold war diplomacy and the catch 22 situation that the Third World nations had to contend with, between the withering away of imperialism and the need for vote banks amidst crushing economic realities. Though affiliation to such alliances raised eyebrows, it did not practically undo the general agenda of the NAM.
See lessWhat was the impact of the Cold War on countries in Africa and Asia? 125 Words
It appears that the Cold War influenced Africa and Asia to the greatest extent as both continents became the battlefield between the USA and USSR. Both superpowers tried to achieve impact in the new independence nations through military memberships, economical assistance and ideology propagation. -ARead more
It appears that the Cold War influenced Africa and Asia to the greatest extent as both continents became the battlefield between the USA and USSR. Both superpowers tried to achieve impact in the new independence nations through military memberships, economical assistance and ideology propagation.
-Africa: Most African nations have turned into mere arenas where the U.S and USSR foster their respective factions to battle out civil wars as illustrated in the drama above through Angola and Ethiopia. This ideological competition led to place instability civil Strife and prolonged Revolution, and coup government. The economic help was not without predicon so that true independence and development in Africa was based on the political need of the west.
-Asia: Both the Korean and Vietnamese war in Asia triggered the decimation in the same region as part of the Cold War. In Asian Realignments, India did not have an ally while Pakistan was captured by the U.S.; Afghanistan became the focus of both sides of a long-term instability.
In essence, the Cold War deepened regional proliferation and conflicts; it also formed political systems and development orientations of these regions.
See lessHow did the Cold War come to an end, and what were the key events leading to its conclusion? 125 Words
It was, in the form of a physical barrier constructed in 1961, called the Berlin Wall, but was an iconic symbol of ideological division. It separated East and West Berlin and was both a practical and a political line dividing between communism of Eastern Europe headed by the Soviet Union and democraRead more
It was, in the form of a physical barrier constructed in 1961, called the Berlin Wall, but was an iconic symbol of ideological division. It separated East and West Berlin and was both a practical and a political line dividing between communism of Eastern Europe headed by the Soviet Union and democracy of the western world led by United States of America and its allies. The Wall, kept East Germans from crossing over to the West, was a symbol of the cold harshness of communism, the fight for freedom,” during this period.
Cold War tensions, which may include diplomacy or spying, are seen by the existence of Red October-A event in which Soviet authorities tries to assassinate the Pope then topple Communism in Eastern Europe. The fall of the Wall in 1989 could also be said to have been a turning point to the end of Soviet influence in East Europe and an era of the Cold war. It signaled a course towards reunification in Germany and break up of the Eastern Europe block system.
See lessWhat was the significance of the Berlin Wall in the context of the Cold War? 125 Words
Concrete cliché: The berlin wall, built in 1961, epitomized the cold war division. Dividing the city into two, it conveyed the essence of Cold War’s division between Eastern Europe aggressors led by the Soviet Union and the democratic western world led United States and their allies. The Wall was erRead more
Concrete cliché: The berlin wall, built in 1961, epitomized the cold war division. Dividing the city into two, it conveyed the essence of Cold War’s division between Eastern Europe aggressors led by the Soviet Union and the democratic western world led United States and their allies. The Wall was erected to keep East Germans from crossing to the West; It was the embodiment of the oppressive cultures of communism which overall maintains the theme of freedom during this period.
Its presence supported what had been said that;
See less‘characterized the Cold War were espionage, propaganda, and proxy wars.’ The year 1989 was important, the Fall of the Wall, the decline of Soviet’s influence, the endpoint in Eastern Europe, the termination of the Cold War. It was also a transformation to reunification in Germany alongside to the break up of Eastern bloc.
Who created the NATO military alliances in 1949? What was its purpose?
THE cold war era which began in the year 1945 which was first termed by George Orwell was a war between two superpowers and they were USSR ( UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC ) and the USA ( UNITED NATIONS AMERICA ) . it was much more a ideological war the NATO was formed by the superpower USA aloRead more
THE cold war era which began in the year 1945 which was first termed by George Orwell was a war between two superpowers and they were USSR ( UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC ) and the USA ( UNITED NATIONS AMERICA ) . it was much more a ideological war the NATO was formed by the superpower USA along with its 11 other western European allies on the 4th April 1949. This block was created basically with the purpose of going against the USSR block the Warsaw pact , the NATO and its allies followed capitalism as its ideology as well as a source of collective defence and along with that winning as a great superpower and influence the world with its ideology , objectives and policies .
See lessWhat problems were germane to the decolonization process in the Malay Peninsula? (150 words) [UPSC 2017]
Decolonization Process in the Malay Peninsula: Problems and Challenges Ethnic Tensions One of the significant challenges was ethnic tensions between the Malay majority and Chinese minority communities. The Communist insurgency led by the Malayan Communist Party (MCP) exacerbated these tensions, as tRead more
Decolonization Process in the Malay Peninsula: Problems and Challenges
Ethnic Tensions
One of the significant challenges was ethnic tensions between the Malay majority and Chinese minority communities. The Communist insurgency led by the Malayan Communist Party (MCP) exacerbated these tensions, as the MCP was predominantly Chinese, creating further divisions.
Political Instability
Political instability marked the period of decolonization. The transition from British rule to independence saw the struggle between various political groups, including the United Malays National Organization (UMNO) and the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA), over the future governance of the peninsula.
Economic Disparities
Economic disparities also posed a challenge. The economic interests of the British, focused on rubber and tin, had left significant imbalances in wealth distribution, contributing to discontent among the local population.
Recent Example
Malaysia’s Independence: The Malay Peninsula gained independence from Britain in 1957, leading to the formation of Malaysia. The Treaty of Independence and the Federal Constitution were critical in addressing ethnic and political issues, setting the stage for a relatively peaceful transition.
These challenges were addressed through a combination of political negotiation, economic reforms, and community integration strategies.
See lessDescribe the efforts made for world peace after the second world war on global level. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2019]
1. Formation of the United Nations: Established in 1945 after the Second World War, the United Nations (UN) aimed to foster international cooperation and prevent future conflicts. The UN's Security Council and General Assembly play crucial roles in maintaining global peace and security. The establisRead more
1. Formation of the United Nations: Established in 1945 after the Second World War, the United Nations (UN) aimed to foster international cooperation and prevent future conflicts. The UN’s Security Council and General Assembly play crucial roles in maintaining global peace and security. The establishment of the UN Peacekeeping Forces has been pivotal in conflict zones, such as Cyprus and South Sudan.
2. Marshall Plan: Initiated in 1948, the Marshall Plan was a U.S. initiative to provide economic aid to European countries to rebuild their economies and prevent the spread of communism. By stabilizing war-torn economies, it reduced the likelihood of conflict in Europe.
3. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT): Opened for signature in 1968, the NPT aimed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote peaceful uses of nuclear energy. The treaty has been instrumental in controlling nuclear arms and fostering disarmament discussions, with India and Pakistan‘s recent nuclear advancements highlighting the ongoing relevance of the NPT.
4. European Union (EU): Originally established as the European Coal and Steel Community in 1951, the EU has evolved into a major political and economic union aimed at fostering economic cooperation and preventing conflicts in Europe. The EU’s success in maintaining peace and stability in Europe serves as a model for regional integration.
5. Recent Example: The Paris Agreement on Climate Change (2015) reflects the global commitment to tackle issues that can indirectly affect world peace by addressing environmental challenges that could lead to conflicts over resources.
Conclusion: Post-World War II efforts, including the formation of the UN, the Marshall Plan, the NPT, and regional integration through entities like the EU, have played crucial roles in fostering global peace and stability. These initiatives demonstrate a collective commitment to preventing future conflicts and promoting international cooperation.
See lessDiscuss the significance of the secret negotiations and backchannel communications between the US and Soviet Union in resolving the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Significance of Secret Negotiations and Backchannel Communications in Resolving the Cuban Missile Crisis The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a critical juncture in Cold War history, characterized by intense geopolitical tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union. The resolutionRead more
Significance of Secret Negotiations and Backchannel Communications in Resolving the Cuban Missile Crisis
The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a critical juncture in Cold War history, characterized by intense geopolitical tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union. The resolution of this crisis was significantly influenced by secret negotiations and backchannel communications, which played a crucial role in de-escalating the situation and avoiding a nuclear conflict. Here is an analysis of their significance.
1. Avoiding Public Escalation
a. Private Channels for Sensitive Discussions
Secret negotiations allowed for discreet and frank discussions away from public scrutiny and media pressure, reducing the risk of escalating the crisis.
b. Prevention of Hostile Actions
The use of private channels helped in avoiding premature or aggressive actions that might have provoked further escalation.
2. Facilitating Compromise and Negotiation
a. Flexibility in Negotiation
Secret negotiations provided both sides with the flexibility to propose and explore mutually acceptable solutions without the constraints of public opinion.
b. Building Trust and Cooperation
The private nature of these negotiations helped build trust and establish a cooperative atmosphere between the two superpowers.
3. Impact on Crisis Management and Resolution
a. Swift and Effective Resolution
The backchannel communications and secret negotiations enabled a swift resolution by allowing both sides to reach an agreement more efficiently than through public diplomacy.
b. Establishing Direct Communication Channels
The success of secret negotiations underscored the importance of direct communication channels in managing international crises.
4. Recent Examples and Lessons
a. Modern Diplomatic Negotiations
The lessons from the Cuban Missile Crisis regarding the value of secret negotiations and backchannel communications continue to be relevant in contemporary diplomatic efforts.
b. Crisis Management in Contemporary Contexts
The principles of using private negotiations to manage sensitive international crises are evident in modern diplomatic practices.
5. Challenges and Criticisms
a. Transparency and Accountability
While secret negotiations are effective in crisis management, they can raise issues of transparency and accountability, as public and legislative oversight may be limited.
b. Potential for Miscommunication
Backchannel communications can also lead to misunderstandings if not handled carefully, potentially undermining trust and complicating diplomatic efforts.
In summary, secret negotiations and backchannel communications were pivotal in resolving the Cuban Missile Crisis by allowing discreet, flexible, and effective dialogue between the U.S. and Soviet Union. These practices helped avoid public escalation, facilitated compromise, and established direct communication channels, which have continued to influence diplomatic strategies in subsequent international crises. The lessons learned from this crisis remain relevant in contemporary diplomacy, emphasizing the importance of effective communication and negotiation in managing global conflicts.
See less