Home/World History/Page 52
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
“The Franco-German war made Germany mistress of Europe and Bismarck master of Germany”, Elucidate.
The war between France and Germany that lasted for a period of one year from 1870-1871 was a significant war as it altered European politics. The quick defeat of Prussia and its German allies over France led to the creation of Germany as well as the assertion of the power of Germany over other countRead more
The war between France and Germany that lasted for a period of one year from 1870-1871 was a significant war as it altered European politics. The quick defeat of Prussia and its German allies over France led to the creation of Germany as well as the assertion of the power of Germany over other countries.
The war was well planned under the leadership of the Prussian Chancellor Otto von Bismarck in such a way that it would compel the French to declare war and to gain the support of other independent German states. France was defeated, and Emperor Napoleon III was taken along with the Second French Empire, ending in the Treaty of Frankfurt. This treaty transferred the regions of Alsace and Lorraine to Germany and demanded a large sum of war damages, which virtually drained France.
It covered the supremacy of the German Empire in Europe and made Bismarck not only the uniter of Germany but the greatest statesman. Bismarck took control over politics within the German Empire after and during the war, earning the nickname ‘Iron Chancellor’. Hence, the Franco-German war undoubtedly dominated, and Germany became the mistress of Europe and placed Bismarck as the master of Germany.
World War 1
World War 1, also known as the First World War or the Great War, was a global conflict that took place from 1914 to 1918. Here are some key aspects and impacts of World War 1: Causes: Nationalism and Imperialism: Rivalries between European nations over colonies and influence led to tensions.Read more
The Great War of 1914-1918 was not only huge and momentous, but it also changed the political and economic nature of the world. Discuss.
World War I is also known as the Great War which lasted from 28 July 1914 to 11 November 1918. It was fought between the Allied Powers and the Central Powers. It is one of the largest wars in the history of the world in which more than 70 million military personnel, including 60 million European peoRead more
World War I is also known as the Great War which lasted from 28 July 1914 to 11 November 1918. It was fought between the Allied Powers and the Central Powers. It is one of the largest wars in the history of the world in which more than 70 million military personnel, including 60 million European people, were mobilised and cost the lives of over 9 million combatants and 7 million civilians. The war changed the political scenario of the world and paved the way for a number of conflicts and in many of the involved nations.
Changes In The Economic Nature
Changes In The Political Nature
The war changed the course of freedom struggle by changing social and economic situations in the world and consequently affected India as well. To compensate for the rising fiscal deficit, the British government increased taxes on all classes leading to difficulties for the common people. Apart from this, the Russian Revolution at the end of the War inspired many towards socialist ideals and power of masses residing in peasants and workers. These events created the ground for discontent against British Raj among across class divide. Furthermore, the war had deep-seated and long-lasting consequences globally both during and the post-war phase. Great War of 1914-1918 lead to a crucial change in the political and economic nature of the world, that eventually set the stage in the long run for the second world war.
See lessWhat were the major causes and consequences of World War I?
World War I, which is often referred to as the Great War, had multiple beginnings and consequent effects. The major causes are:- 1. Militarism: As a result of an arms race among European countries, tensions rose with the growth of armies and navies. 2. Alliances: Europe was divided into hostile campRead more
World War I, which is often referred to as the Great War, had multiple beginnings and consequent effects.
The major causes are:-
1. Militarism: As a result of an arms race among European countries, tensions rose with the growth of armies and navies.
2. Alliances: Europe was divided into hostile camps by such complex coalitions as the Triple Entente (France, Russia and Britain) and the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy).
3. Imperialism: Rivalries among the major powers were intensified by their scramble for colonies and global supremacy.
4. Nationalism: Governments embraced aggressive policies in order to assert their authority while ethnic groups sought independence through wars.
5. Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand: Consequently Serbia was invaded by Austria-Hungary after heir to the throne had been assassinated by a Serbian nationalist.
The major consequences are:-
The cost of human life is higher than 160,000 deaths and 220,000 injuries.
See less1. Political changes: The World War I led to the collapse of empires (Russian, Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, and German) and the creation of new states such as Russia, Turkey, Hungary, Austria, and Germany.
2. Economic impact: This put the European country under massive financial pressure, leading to a recession.
3. Social Impact: A change in society has led to a greater role for women in the workplace.
4. Treaty of Versailles: Germany was severely compensated for economic difficulties and political instability, paving the way for the rise of Adolf Hitler to power and contributing to World War II.
To what extent can Germany be held responsible for causing the two World Wars? Discuss critically.
Militarism and Alliances: Germany's militaristic policies and aggressive alliances (e.g., the Triple Alliance with Austria-Hungary and Italy) contributed significantly to tensions in Europe. The arms race heightened hostilities among major powers. Immediate Cause: The assassination of Archduke FranzRead more
3.5
What do you understand about the “Policy of Appeasement”? To what extent was it responsible for the outbreak of the World War – II?
Britain and France used appeasement as a way to avoid war with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy in the 1930s. This approach helped start World War II by letting Hitler ask for more and more. It showed weakness because it didn't stop his early attacks. People thought Hitler just wanted some land, but tRead more
The collection of peace treaties out of World War I was not a conspicuous success, it affected the dividing of Europe into states which wanted to revise the settlement and those which wanted to preserve it. Explain.
The peace treaties that emerged from World War I, particularly the Treaty of Versailles with Germany and others like the Treaty of Saint-Germain with Austria and the Treaty of Trianon with Hungary, were indeed a mixed bag in terms of their success and impact. Here’s how they affected the division ofRead more
The peace treaties that emerged from World War I, particularly the Treaty of Versailles with Germany and others like the Treaty of Saint-Germain with Austria and the Treaty of Trianon with Hungary, were indeed a mixed bag in terms of their success and impact. Here’s how they affected the division of Europe into states that sought revision of the settlement versus those that sought to preserve it:
1.Treaties and National Aspirations:
The treaties aimed to redraw the map of Europe based on national self-determination, a principle championed by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson. This meant creating new nation-states or granting independence to various ethnic groups that were previously part of multi-national empires like the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Ottoman Empire.
2.Creation of New States:
The treaties led to the creation of new states such as Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, which were formed by combining different ethnic groups under one political umbrella. Poland regained independence after being partitioned for over a century. These new states generally accepted the territorial and political boundaries imposed by the treaties.
3.Desire for Revision:
On the other hand, the treaties imposed harsh penalties on defeated powers like Germany and Hungary, including loss of territories, reparations payments, and military restrictions. These provisions were seen as punitive by the affected states and stirred resentment. Germany, in particular, felt humiliated by the Treaty of Versailles, which led to political instability and provided fertile ground for revisionist sentiments.
4.Dividing Europe:
The treaties divided Europe into states that were content with the settlement and those that were discontent and sought revision. States like France and Belgium, which had suffered greatly during the war and had territorial claims satisfied by the treaties, were generally supportive of maintaining the status quo. They viewed the treaties as necessary for security and stability.
5.Revisionist States:
On the other hand, Germany, Hungary, and later Italy felt aggrieved by the terms of the treaties. They sought to revise the treaties to regain lost territories, overturn punitive measures, and restore their international standing. This led to revisionist policies and nationalist movements within these countries, often challenging the post-war order and seeking to undo what they saw as unjust impositions.
6.Impact on International Relations:
The discontent and desire for revision contributed to tensions in Europe during the interwar period. It undermined the stability established by the treaties and contributed to the rise of aggressive nationalism and expansionist policies, particularly evident in Germany under Adolf Hitler and Italy under Benito Mussolini.
In conclusion, while the peace treaties after World War I aimed to establish a new, more stable order in Europe based on national self-determination, they simultaneously created a divide between states willing to preserve the settlement and those seeking to revise it. This division fueled political tensions and played a significant role in shaping the geopolitical landscape of Europe leading up to World War II.
See lessThe civil war in Spain was not viewed as merely a Spanish affair but one in which the entire world, threatened by fascism and aggression and often described as the “Dress rehearsal” of the Second World War. Describe.
The Spanish Civil War (1936 - 1939) was no ordinary civil war. Ideological conflict: Spain became an ideological battleground where fascism (made up of Nationalists led by Franco) clashed with democracy and leftist ideals (backing Republicans. The fascist successes strengthened the hand of Hitler anRead more
The Spanish Civil War (1936 – 1939) was no ordinary civil war.
Ideological conflict: Spain became an ideological battleground where fascism (made up of Nationalists led by Franco) clashed with democracy and leftist ideals (backing Republicans. The fascist successes strengthened the hand of Hitler and Mussolini, while democracies felt an urgent sense to rein them in.
Foreign intervention: Germany and Italy provided troops, weapons, airpower to the Nationalists The Republicans were aided by the Soviet Union in response. It was a sign of the Olympus 1s that would play out in WWII. Testing Ground for
Tactics: Tanks, aircraft and new mechanized warfare for both sides. The war became a testing arena for doctrines soon to be used again in deadly fashion against civilians during WWII.
Microcosm of Global Conflict: The Spanish Civil War, attracted people from around the world travelled to Spain and fought for one side or another while foreign fascists entered on behalf of Franco Agaisnt them), with these fighting columns termed in conjuction known as International Brigades This international dimension reflected the kinds of global alliances that would characterize WWII.
The Spanish Civil War had also provided a stark warning of the dangers that fascism could pose, and so too its potential for fuelling an even wider conflict in Europe. A “dress rehearsal” in the sense that it displayed all of the ideological tensions, military capabilities and international alliances that would soon plunge humanity into a far bloodier conflict.
See less“Bismarck created a new Germany with the policy of ‘blood and’ iron’.” Comment
Bismarck's "blood and iron" policy was a significant catalyst in the unification and transformation of Germany in the 19th century. The comment regarding Bismarck creating a new Germany through this policy is accurate and merits further examination. The Policy of "Blood and Iron": Bismarck's famousRead more
Bismarck’s “blood and iron” policy was a significant catalyst in the unification and transformation of Germany in the 19th century. The comment regarding Bismarck creating a new Germany through this policy is accurate and merits further examination.
The Policy of “Blood and Iron”:
Bismarck’s famous “blood and iron” speech, delivered in the Prussian parliament in 1862, laid out his philosophy of achieving German unification through a combination of military force and pragmatic diplomacy. He believed that the fragmented German states could only be unified under Prussian leadership, and that this would require the use of military power to overcome resistance and establish Prussian dominance.
Unification through Conflict:
Bismarck’s “blood and iron” policy was put into practice through a series of wars that he engineered to strengthen Prussia’s position and ultimately lead to the creation of a unified German Empire. These included the Schleswig-Holstein War (1864), the Austro-Prussian War (1866), and the Franco-Prussian War (1870-71). The decisive victories in these conflicts allowed Bismarck to assert Prussian hegemony and consolidate the various German states under the leadership of the Prussian monarch, King William I.
Transformation of the German Landscape:
The unification of Germany, forged through Bismarck’s “blood and iron” policy, brought about a fundamental transformation in the political, economic, and social landscape of the region. The formation of the German Empire in 1871 marked the end of the fragmented German Confederation and the emergence of a powerful, centralized nation-state. This new Germany became a dominant force in European affairs, wielding significant political, economic, and military influence.
Lasting Impact and Legacy:
Bismarck’s “blood and iron” approach, while controversial and at times brutal, was undoubtedly effective in achieving his goal of German unification. The establishment of the German Empire under Prussian leadership laid the foundation for the country’s subsequent rise as a major industrial and military power in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Bismarck’s policy and the resulting unification had far-reaching consequences, both positive and negative, that continue to shape the course of European and global history.
In conclusion, the assessment that Bismarck’s “blood and iron” policy created a new Germany is accurate. The unification of the German states under Prussian leadership, achieved through a combination of military force and shrewd diplomacy, marked a significant turning point in the country’s history and transformed the political and geopolitical landscape of Europe.
See lessExplain how the foundations of the modern world were laid by the American and French revolution.
The American and French Revolutions of the late 18th century laid the foundations for the modern world in several significant ways: 1. Establishment of Principles of Democracy and Self-Governance: - The American Revolution, with its declaration that "all men are created equal" and the establishmentRead more
The American and French Revolutions of the late 18th century laid the foundations for the modern world in several significant ways:
1. Establishment of Principles of Democracy and Self-Governance:
– The American Revolution, with its declaration that “all men are created equal” and the establishment of a republican system of government, challenged the divine right of monarchs and aristocratic rule.
– The French Revolution’s declaration of the “Rights of Man and of the Citizen” and the establishment of a republic based on the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity provided a new model of popular sovereignty and self-governance.
– These revolutionary ideals of democracy, popular sovereignty, and individual rights have since become the foundation for modern liberal democracies around the world.
2. Weakening of Absolutist Monarchies and Feudal Systems:
– The successful revolutions against the established monarchical and feudal orders in both the United States and France demonstrated the potential for the masses to overthrow entrenched power structures.
– This set a precedent for the gradual decline of absolute monarchy and the erosion of feudal systems in Europe and beyond, paving the way for the emergence of constitutional monarchies and more representative forms of government.
3. Advancement of Nationalism and Self-Determination:
– The revolutions fostered a sense of national identity and the right to self-determination, as the colonists in America and the citizens in France asserted their autonomy and the right to govern themselves.
– This inspired and influenced nationalist movements in other parts of the world, contributing to the gradual dissolution of colonial empires and the emergence of independent nation-states.
4. Promotion of Individual Rights and Liberties:
– The revolutions championed the ideas of individual rights, civil liberties, and the protection of personal freedoms, which became enshrined in foundational documents such as the American Bill of Rights and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man.
– These principles have since become central to modern human rights frameworks and the development of international laws and institutions.
5. Economic and Social Transformation:
– The revolutions disrupted the existing social and economic orders, weakening the power of the landed aristocracy and paving the way for the rise of the bourgeoisie and the capitalist system.
– This process of social and economic transformation laid the groundwork for the Industrial Revolution and the development of modern capitalism, which have profoundly shaped the global economy and social structures.
While the specific historical contexts and outcomes of the American and French Revolutions differed, their shared emphasis on democratic principles, individual rights, and the challenging of entrenched power structures have had a lasting impact on the foundations of the modern world. These revolutionary ideals and their subsequent evolution continue to influence global political, social, and economic developments to this day.
See less