Significance of Mikhail Gorbachev's Policies: Glasnost and Perestroika 1. Glasnost (Openness) Definition and Objectives: Glasnost, meaning "openness," was a policy introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev to promote transparency and freedom of expression within the Soviet Union. It aimed to reduce the governRead more
Significance of Mikhail Gorbachev’s Policies: Glasnost and Perestroika
1. Glasnost (Openness)
- Definition and Objectives: Glasnost, meaning “openness,” was a policy introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev to promote transparency and freedom of expression within the Soviet Union. It aimed to reduce the government’s control over information and encourage public discourse.
- Impact on Public Discourse: This policy led to increased freedom of the press and the exposure of previously hidden societal issues, such as corruption and inefficiencies within the Communist Party. For example, the publication of “Chernobyl: The Final Warning” highlighted the catastrophic failures in handling the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, which undermined public trust in the government.
- Political Repercussions: Glasnost contributed to the rise of political movements and criticism of the Soviet regime. The increased openness allowed for a more vocal and organized opposition, which eventually played a role in challenging the established order.
2. Perestroika (Restructuring)
- Definition and Objectives: Perestroika, meaning “restructuring,” was aimed at reforming the Soviet economic and political systems to address stagnation and inefficiency. It sought to decentralize economic control, introduce market mechanisms, and promote private enterprise.
- Economic Reforms: Under Perestroika, there was an attempt to transition from a centrally planned economy to a more market-oriented approach. Reforms included allowing limited private businesses and foreign investments. The Law on Cooperatives (1988) permitted the establishment of private cooperatives, which marked a significant shift towards economic liberalization.
- Political Reforms: Perestroika also included political reforms such as the introduction of multi-candidate elections and increased political pluralism. The Congress of People’s Deputies (1989) was a key innovation, allowing for greater representation and debate within the Soviet political system.
3. Role in the Disintegration of the Soviet System
- Increased Criticism and Unrest: The policies of Glasnost and Perestroika inadvertently exposed the weaknesses and failures of the Soviet system. This led to widespread criticism and growing unrest among the population. For example, the Baltic States’ independence movements gained momentum as the policy of openness highlighted their grievances and aspirations for autonomy.
- Economic Challenges: The economic restructuring under Perestroika did not yield immediate positive results. Instead, it led to further economic difficulties, including shortages and inflation, which eroded public confidence in the Soviet system.
- Political Fragmentation: The reforms weakened the central authority of the Communist Party and emboldened nationalist and separatist movements. The August Coup (1991), a failed attempt by hardline Communists to restore the old order, further accelerated the disintegration process. Ultimately, the Belavezha Accords (December 1991), which formally dissolved the Soviet Union, marked the culmination of the weakening of Soviet unity due to Gorbachev’s reforms.
In summary, Gorbachev’s policies of Glasnost and Perestroika were significant in promoting openness and restructuring within the Soviet Union. However, they also exposed and exacerbated existing problems, contributing to the eventual collapse of the Soviet system. These reforms, while intended to modernize and revitalize the Soviet Union, instead accelerated its disintegration by undermining the central authority and failing to address economic challenges effectively.
See less
The revolutionary protest in France 1789 was due to poor economic situations, several forms of social injustices, political inefficiency and as influenced by the enlightenment. Economic crises for instance acted a major part. Other primary reasons included years of expensive wars up to the involvemeRead more
The revolutionary protest in France 1789 was due to poor economic situations, several forms of social injustices, political inefficiency and as influenced by the enlightenment.
Economic crises for instance acted a major part. Other primary reasons included years of expensive wars up to the involvement in what was known as the American Revolution that bankrupted the royal treasury. People were starving to death because food prices began to rise when crops failed in the late 1780s, and many citizens continued to be impoverished with frustrated rage. Meanwhile, taxes laid were heavy particularly on the peasantry and middle class while noble and clergy enjoyed immunities.
Social equality proved to worsen the situation. The rigid estate system divided society into three groups: the Clergy, the Nobility, and the Tiers État or the Third State. The Third Estate comprised peasants, urban aristocracy, and the increasing middle class while enjoying a numerical dominance; it was politically powerless.
Rising political decisions that were made by King Louis XVI and his governing body also added to the problem. Some of the undertake to modify the system of taxes and solve the financial problem of the monarchy failed as well as the calling of the Estates-General in 1789 indicated that there were elucidations. Feeling unrepresented, the Third Estate could refuse the monarch’s authority and called itself the National Assembly.
It became decentralized for the people to demand change due to enlightening ideas such as liberty, equality and popular sovereignty heralded revolution.
See less