Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account?

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question

World History

Share
Followers
142 Answers
691 Questions
Home/World History/Page 16

Mains Answer Writing Latest Questions

Neeta Sawant
  • 0
Neeta SawantBegginer
Asked: July 15, 2024In:
  • 0

  1. Ayesha Zafar
    Ayesha Zafar Begginer

    Ancient civilizations made several technological advancements that significantly influenced their societies and future generations. Two of the most influential are the invention of the wheel and the development of writing systems. The Wheel The wheel, first invented in Mesopotamia around 3500 BCE, rRead more

    Ancient civilizations made several technological advancements that significantly influenced their societies and future generations. Two of the most influential are the invention of the wheel and the development of writing systems.

    The Wheel

    The wheel, first invented in Mesopotamia around 3500 BCE, revolutionized transportation and labor. Initially used for pottery, it soon transformed into a vital component for carts and chariots, facilitating trade and warfare. The wheel’s impact on agriculture, as seen in plow improvements, increased efficiency and productivity. This invention laid the foundation for further advancements in engineering and mechanics.

    Writing Systems

    The development of writing systems was another groundbreaking advancement. In Mesopotamia, the Sumerians created cuneiform around 3200 BCE, while the Egyptians developed hieroglyphics shortly after. Writing allowed for the recording of laws, trade transactions, and historical events, preserving knowledge and enabling complex administration. It also facilitated the spread of ideas and culture, contributing to societal organization and governance.

    These advancements in transportation and communication were crucial for the development of ancient civilizations. They enabled more complex societies, trade expansion, and cultural exchange, setting the stage for future technological progress.

    See less
Ayesha Zafar
  • 0
Ayesha ZafarBegginer
Asked: July 15, 2024In:
  • 0

What was the role of ideology in the Cold War. How did competing ideologies of capitalism and communism shape the strategies and policies of the United States and the Soviet Union?

question
  1. Sanskriti Srivastava
    Sanskriti Srivastava Begginer

    The role of ideology in the Cold War was central and defining. The Cold War was essentially a struggle between two diametrically opposed ideologies: capitalism, championed by the United States, and communism, led by the Soviet Union. These ideologies shaped not only the internal policies of both supRead more

    The role of ideology in the Cold War was central and defining. The Cold War was essentially a struggle between two diametrically opposed ideologies: capitalism, championed by the United States, and communism, led by the Soviet Union. These ideologies shaped not only the internal policies of both superpowers but also their international strategies and foreign policies.

    Role of Ideology

    1. Foundation of Conflict: The ideological clash was at the heart of the Cold War. The United States believed in capitalism, democracy, and individual freedoms, while the Soviet Union promoted communism, a planned economy, and a one-party state. Each side viewed the other’s ideology as a threat to its way of life and global stability.
    2. Propaganda: Both sides used propaganda to promote their ideology. The United States emphasized the freedoms and economic opportunities provided by capitalism, while the Soviet Union highlighted the supposed equality and social justice of communism. Each portrayed the other as oppressive and dangerous.

    Shaping Strategies and Policies

    These competing ideologies of both countries shape their strategies and policies such as:

    1. United States
      • Containment Policy: The U.S. adopted the strategy of containment to prevent the spread of communism. This policy was articulated by George Kennan and led to U.S. involvement in various parts of the world to counter Soviet influence.
      • Marshall Plan: The U.S. implemented the Marshall Plan to rebuild war-torn Europe. This was not only to help economic recovery but also to prevent European countries from falling under communist influence by showing the benefits of capitalism.
      • Military Alliances: The U.S. formed military alliances such as NATO to create a united front against the Soviet Union. This was part of the broader strategy to encircle and contain communist expansion.
      • Support for Anti-Communist Regimes: The U.S. often supported authoritarian regimes if they were anti-communist, prioritizing the fight against communism over the promotion of democracy.
    2. Soviet Union
      • Expansion of Influence: The Soviet Union sought to expand its influence in Eastern Europe and beyond. It established communist governments in Eastern Europe, creating a buffer zone against the West.
      • Support for Communist Movements: The USSR supported communist parties and revolutionary movements worldwide, from Asia to Latin America, aiming to spread communism and counter capitalist influence.
      • Warsaw Pact: In response to NATO, the Soviet Union established the Warsaw Pact, a military alliance of communist countries in Eastern Europe, to consolidate its control and provide a counterweight to Western alliances.
      • Economic Policies: The Soviet Union promoted centralized economic planning and state ownership of resources. It provided economic aid to countries aligning with its ideology to showcase the benefits of communism.

    Conclusion

    The ideological battle between capitalism and communism was the essence of the Cold War, influencing nearly every aspect of U.S. and Soviet strategies and policies. This ideological conflict shaped the global order for nearly half a century, affecting international relations, domestic politics, and the lives of millions around the world.

    See less
Akshat Pandey
  • 0
Akshat PandeyBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In:
  • 0

What were the key factors that led to the decline of the Roman Empire?

empirehistoryroman
  1. Manoj Singh
    Manoj Singh Learner

    The decline of the Roman Empire was a complex process influenced by multiple factors over several centuries. Here are some key factors that contributed to its decline: Political Instability and Corruption: The Roman Empire experienced frequent civil wars, political intrigues, and power struggles amoRead more

    The decline of the Roman Empire was a complex process influenced by multiple factors over several centuries. Here are some key factors that contributed to its decline:

    Political Instability and Corruption: The Roman Empire experienced frequent civil wars, political intrigues, and power struggles among emperors, leading to instability and weakened central authority. Corruption within the government and military also undermined trust and efficiency.

    Economic Decline and Over-Reliance on Slavery: The Roman economy faced challenges such as heavy taxation, inflation, wealth inequality, and reliance on slave labor. Agricultural productivity declined, and trade routes were disrupted, affecting economic stability and prosperity.

    Military Problems and Overexpansion: Continuous wars and military expenses strained the empire’s resources and manpower. The need to defend and administer vast territories stretched the military thin, making the empire vulnerable to external threats.

    Barbarian Invasions and Border Defense: From the 3rd century onwards, the Roman Empire faced increasingly frequent invasions and raids by Germanic tribes and other barbarian groups along its borders. The Roman military struggled to repel these invasions effectively.

    Social and Cultural Decline: Internal social factors such as moral decay, loss of civic virtue, declining population due to plagues, and a shift away from traditional Roman values contributed to societal instability and weakened resilience.

    Division of the Empire: The Roman Empire was eventually divided into the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) in the 4th century. The Western Empire faced more severe challenges and ultimately fell in 476 AD, while the Eastern Empire continued for another thousand years.

    Religious Transformation: The spread of Christianity throughout the empire altered religious and cultural dynamics. While Christianity provided a unifying force, religious conflicts and debates also contributed to social divisions and political instability.

    Ineffective Leadership and Reforms: Despite occasional efforts at reform by emperors and statesmen, such as Diocletian’s administrative reforms and Constantine’s establishment of a new capital in Constantinople, these measures were often insufficient to address underlying systemic issues.

    In summary, the decline of the Roman Empire was a culmination of political, economic, military, social, and cultural factors that gradually weakened its cohesion and resilience. The combination of internal weaknesses and external pressures ultimately contributed to the empire’s fragmentation and eventual collapse in the West, marking a significant historical transition in Europe and the Mediterranean world.

    See less
Roshni Singh
  • 0
Roshni SinghBegginer
Asked: July 16, 2024In: , , , , , , ,
  • 0

How did Political and social changes of the 20th century affect mental health treatment?

question
  1. Pankaj Gautam
    Pankaj Gautam Learner

    The 20th century saw significant political and social changes that had profound effects on mental health treatment: Deinstitutionalization: Beginning in the mid-20th century, there was a movement to close large psychiatric hospitals and shift towards community-based mental health care. This was partRead more

    The 20th century saw significant political and social changes that had profound effects on mental health treatment:

    Deinstitutionalization: Beginning in the mid-20th century, there was a movement to close large psychiatric hospitals and shift towards community-based mental health care. This was partly in response to concerns about the conditions in asylums and the desire to integrate people with mental illnesses back into society. While this had positive implications for patient rights and autonomy, it also led to challenges in providing adequate community-based support.

    Advancements in Psychiatry: The 20th century saw major advancements in understanding mental illnesses, particularly with the development of psychotropic medications such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers. This pharmacological revolution transformed the treatment landscape, making it possible to manage symptoms more effectively and allowing many patients to live more functional lives.

    Civil Rights Movements: The civil rights movements of the 20th century, including the African-American Civil Rights Movement, the women’s rights movement, and the disability rights movement, had implications for mental health treatment. They highlighted disparities in access to care and treatment outcomes among different populations, leading to increased advocacy for equitable mental health services.

    Global Conflicts and Trauma: Wars and conflicts throughout the 20th century, such as World War I, World War II, and the Vietnam War, highlighted the psychological toll of trauma. These experiences influenced the development of trauma-focused therapies and interventions aimed at addressing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other trauma-related conditions.

    Stigma Reduction: Throughout the 20th century, there was a gradual reduction in the stigma associated with mental illness. Increased awareness, education, and advocacy efforts contributed to greater acceptance and understanding of mental health issues. This shift helped encourage more individuals to seek treatment without fear of social ostracism.

    Policy and Legislation: Governments around the world began to enact policies and legislation aimed at protecting the rights of people with mental illnesses, ensuring access to treatment, and promoting community integration. Examples include the Community Mental Health Act in the United States and similar reforms in other countries.

    Overall, the political and social changes of the 20th century reshaped mental health treatment by promoting deinstitutionalization, advancing psychiatric care and medications, advocating for patient rights, addressing trauma, reducing stigma, and implementing supportive policies. These changes have had lasting impacts on how mental health care is provided and perceived globally.

    See less
Nabilah Qureshi
  • 0
Nabilah QureshiBegginer
Asked: July 17, 2024In:
  • 0

historyquestionworld war
  1. Parvati
    Parvati Begginer

    The Treaty of Versailles, signed in 1919, imposed harsh penalties on Germany following World War I, which deeply humiliated the nation and fueled a sense of injustice and resentment among its people. The treaty demanded that Germany accept sole responsibility for causing the war (the infamous "war gRead more

    The Treaty of Versailles, signed in 1919, imposed harsh penalties on Germany following World War I, which deeply humiliated the nation and fueled a sense of injustice and resentment among its people. The treaty demanded that Germany accept sole responsibility for causing the war (the infamous “war guilt clause”), pay enormous reparations, and cede territories. Economically, Germany struggled under these reparations, leading to hyperinflation and social unrest during the 1920s. Politically, extremist movements like the Nazis capitalized on these grievances, promising to restore Germany’s pride and greatness.

     

    The perception of German guilt propagated by the Treaty of Versailles became a powerful propaganda tool for Hitler and the Nazi Party. They exploited this narrative to rally support, arguing that Germany had been unfairly treated and that they would overturn the treaty’s terms. Hitler’s aggressive foreign policy aimed to overturn the territorial losses and military restrictions imposed by Versailles, which ultimately led to the outbreak of World War II in 1939.

     

    In essence, the Treaty of Versailles created a fertile ground for nationalist and extremist ideologies to flourish in Germany. It fueled resentment, economic instability, and a desire for revenge, setting the stage for the rise of Hitler and the catastrophic conflict that followed.

    See less
Ashwini Kumar Singh
  • 1
Ashwini Kumar SinghBegginer
Asked: July 18, 2024In: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • 1

What is the timeline of development of Aryan Invasion Theory? Has it really being debunked or does it still subsist? What evidences do we have regarding the alleged Aryan migration into India? Why is it such a volatile and controversial ...

artsculturehinduismhistoryindia
  1. Kartik Sharma
    Kartik Sharma Begginer

    The Aryan Invasion Theory has a complex and controversial history of development and interpretation. Here is an overview of the timeline and key points regarding this topic: Timeline of Aryan Invasion Theory Development: 19th Century: The theory first emerged in the 19th century, proposed by EuropeaRead more

    The Aryan Invasion Theory has a complex and controversial history of development and interpretation. Here is an overview of the timeline and key points regarding this topic:

    Timeline of Aryan Invasion Theory Development:

    1. 19th Century: The theory first emerged in the 19th century, proposed by European scholars who suggested a migration of Indo-European “Aryan” people into the Indian subcontinent and their subjugation of the indigenous population.
    2. Early 20th Century: The theory was further developed and popularized, associating the Aryans with the decline of the Indus Valley Civilization and the rise of Vedic culture in India.
    3. Mid-20th Century: The theory faced increasing criticism and scrutiny, with scholars questioning the linguistic, archaeological, and genetic evidence used to support it.
    4. Late 20th Century: Many scholars began to reject the Aryan Invasion Theory, proposing alternative models such as the Aryan Migration Theory or the Indigenous Aryan Theory.

    Debate and Controversy:

    1. Debunking the Theory: While the Aryan Invasion Theory has been largely discredited by mainstream scholarship, there is still an ongoing debate about the nature and timing of any potential Aryan migration into India.
    2. Linguistic Evidence: The linguistic connections between Indo-European languages, including those spoken in India, are well-established. However, the interpretation of this evidence and its implications for population movements remain contested.
    3. Archaeological Evidence: The archaeological record does not show evidence of a large-scale invasion or sudden cultural change in the Indian subcontinent. Instead, it suggests a gradual process of cultural development and exchange.
    4. Genetic Evidence: Genetic studies have not provided conclusive evidence for a large-scale, sudden migration of people into India. The data suggests a more complex and gradual demographic history, with multiple waves of migration and admixture.
    5. Ideological Implications: The Aryan Invasion Theory has been used to justify racial and nationalist ideologies, which has made it a highly contentious and politically charged topic, particularly in India.

    In summary, while the Aryan Invasion Theory has been largely debunked by mainstream scholarship, the nature and timeline of any Aryan migration into India remains an active area of research and debate, with ongoing discussions about the linguistic, archaeological, and genetic evidence.

    See less
MinimalistHavenCo
  • 0
MinimalistHavenCoBegginer
Asked: July 18, 2024In: ,
  • 0

  1. Shaik Sumayyah
    Shaik Sumayyah Begginer

    The  possible reasons for the decline of Indus civilisation are flood, migration, invasion The decline of the Indus Valley Civilization around 1900-1700 BCE was likely caused by several factors: environmental changes, including climate shifts and river shifts that affected agriculture and trade routRead more

    The  possible reasons for the decline of Indus civilisation are flood, migration, invasion

    The decline of the Indus Valley Civilization around 1900-1700 BCE was likely caused by several factors: environmental changes, including climate shifts and river shifts that affected agriculture and trade routes; internal factors such as overuse of land and resources leading to soil exhaustion; and external pressures such as invasions or migrations of Indo-Aryan peoples. These combined factors weakened cities, disrupted trade networks, and contributed to the eventual abandonment of urban centers, marking the end of the civilization’s urban phase.

     

     

    See less
Rakshita Malviya
  • 0
Rakshita MalviyaBegginer
Asked: July 18, 2024In: , ,
  • 0

  1. Sreeja depa
    Sreeja depa Begginer

    The Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) is often seen as a precursor to World War II due to several key factors: Proxy War: The conflict was a battleground for ideological warfare between fascism and communism. The Nationalists, led by Francisco Franco, received significant support from Nazi Germany and FRead more

    The Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) is often seen as a precursor to World War II due to several key factors:

    1. Proxy War: The conflict was a battleground for ideological warfare between fascism and communism. The Nationalists, led by Francisco Franco, received significant support from Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, while the Soviet Union and international brigades from various countries supported the Republicans.
    2. Testing Ground for Tactics and Technology: Hitler and Mussolini used the war to test new military tactics and technologies, including blitzkrieg strategies and aerial bombardment. This provided valuable combat experience and insights that were later used during World War II.
    3. International Involvement: The Spanish Civil War drew in numerous foreign fighters and observers, foreshadowing the global nature of the upcoming conflict. Notably, the involvement of American volunteers in the war resulted in early confrontations between Americans and Nazi forces.
    4. Polarization of Europe: The war heightened political tensions across Europe, solidifying alliances and enmities that would later play crucial roles in World War II. It starkly illustrated the coming global struggle between totalitarian regimes and democratic nations.

    In summary, the Spanish Civil War was a microcosm of the ideological, military, and geopolitical conflicts that would erupt globally in World War II.

    See less
Shaik Sumayyah
  • 0
Shaik SumayyahBegginer
Asked: July 18, 2024In:
  • 0

Was Mount Everest scaled in 1924?

question
  1. Ashley F
    Ashley F Begginer
    This answer was edited.

    Who Was First On Everest? Mount Everest is the tallest mountain in the world as we know it. Many people wanted to be the first to climb it. Two climbers named George Mallory and Andrew "Sandy" Irvine tried to climb Everest in 1924. They never came back. We don't know if they made it to the top or noRead more

    Who Was First On Everest?

    Mount Everest is the tallest mountain in the world as we know it. Many people wanted to be the first to climb it.

    Two climbers named George Mallory and Andrew “Sandy” Irvine tried to climb Everest in 1924. They never came back. We don’t know if they made it to the top or not.

    It wasn’t until 1953 that two other people climbed to the top of the Everest. Their names were Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay. They were the first two people to prove they reached the highest peak on earth.

    See less
Adith M
  • 0
Adith MBegginer
Asked: July 19, 2024In:
  • 0

In what ways did the ancient Mesopotamian and Egyptian societies differ from their political and social structures?

ancientegyptmesopotamiapolitics
  1. Yawar Jalal
    Yawar Jalal Begginer
    This answer was edited.

    The Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilization developed simultaneously, its origins date back to 3500 bc. Both civilizations were sometimes influenced by each other. The Egyptian civilization was offered stability by the river Nile and the Mesopotamian - Persians developed in the river Tigris and EuphrRead more

    The Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilization developed simultaneously, its origins date back to 3500 bc. Both civilizations were sometimes influenced by each other. The Egyptian civilization was offered stability by the river Nile and the Mesopotamian – Persians developed in the river Tigris and Euphrates , formerly called the Babylonian or Babylonian – Assyrian civilization.

    Both the Egyptian and  Mesopotamian civilizations differed from each other in many fundamental ways.  Egyptians were naturally protected due to there geography while Mesopotamians were always under the threat of foreign incursions. Unlike Egyptians Mesopotamians were also threatened by regular floods. Mesopotamian culture too was more warlike and pessimistic than Egyptians.

    The political structure of Egyptian was unified compared to the Mesopotamians. The King was supreme in both the civilizations but Egyptians had centralized political outlook and The Mesopotamians had decentralized political structure.

    For most part Egyptian population were divided into five classes 1. The royal family 2. The priests 3. The nobles 4. middle class 5. peasants. During the New Kingdom another class was added of professional soldiers. On the contrary Mesopotamians had four classes 1. Royalty 2. upper class 3. middle class 4. lower class. Polygamy was permitted under pharaohs of Egypt But normally the basic unit of family was of monogamous nature. Even Pharaohs, who could keep a harem of secondary wives and concubines had a chief wife. Concubinage was socially reputable institution and women were not entirely subordinated to Men under Egyptian civilization. Mesopotamians had rigid policies towards women, who could not even marry of her choice. Under the Mesopotamians women were completely subordinated to Men.

    See less
Load More Questions

Resources & Suggestions

Mains Answer Writing Latest Articles

On: March 15, 2025 Comments: 0

भारत-श्रीलंका मत्स्य-ग्रहण संबंधी विवाद

यह लेख भारत-श्रीलंका के बीच पाक खाड़ी में मत्स्य विवाद पर केंद्रित है, जिसमें स्थायी समाधान, सरकारी कार्रवाई और बातचीत की आवश्यकता को उजागर किया गया है। प्रमुख मुद्दे निरंतर गिरफ्तारियाँ: भारतीय मछुआरे अक्सर इंजन खराब होने या मौसम के ...

On: March 15, 2025 Comments: 0

“Navigating the India-Sri Lanka Fisheries Dispute”

The article discusses the longstanding fisheries dispute between India and Sri Lanka, highlighting the need for sustainable solutions and renewed bilateral talks. Key Issues in the Fisheries Dispute Recurrent Arrests: Indian fishermen are frequently arrested for straying into Sri Lankan ...

On: March 15, 2025

Daily Answer Writing Practice Questions (15 March 2025)

Identify the sources of finance for local self-governments in India and suggest measures to strengthen their financial position. (200 words) भारत में स्थानीय स्व-शासी संस्थाओं के वित्तीय स्रोतों का उल्लेख करते हुए, उनकी वित्तीय स्थिति को सुदृढ़ करने के उपाय ...

Explore Our Blog