Home/Post-independence India/Polity Since Independence/Page 3
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
In democracy the voice of the opposition should be amplified, not the noise. Discuss how this nature had effected the session in past decade. Also suggest measures to improve the efficiency and efficacy of the parliament.
In a democracy, the voice of the opposition should be amplified, not the noise. Over the past decade, Indian parliamentary sessions have often been disrupted by confrontations, reducing legislative productivity and diminishing public trust. For example, the 15th Lok Sabha lost over 40% of its scheduRead more
In a democracy, the voice of the opposition should be amplified, not the noise. Over the past decade, Indian parliamentary sessions have often been disrupted by confrontations, reducing legislative productivity and diminishing public trust. For example, the 15th Lok Sabha lost over 40% of its scheduled time due to such disruptions.
Enhancing Parliamentary Efficiency and Efficacy
Innovative Reforms:
By adopting these innovative measures, the Indian Parliament can transform into a dynamic forum for meaningful debate and decision-making, reflecting the true spirit of democracy and ensuring efficient governance.
See lessTo what extent does ethnicity influence the demand for the creation of separate states?
Modern states are large and complex with several cultural and economic problems and historical experiences add complexity to their problems. Since independence Indian states have had to deal with the demands of separate statehood largely based on language, culture, ethnicity, religion, etc. Later thRead more
Modern states are large and complex with several cultural and economic problems and historical experiences add complexity to their problems. Since independence Indian states have had to deal with the demands of separate statehood largely based on language, culture, ethnicity, religion, etc. Later the basis for separate statehood demands was largely shifted to better governance and greater participation, administrative convenience, economic viability in the developmental needs of sub-regions. As democracy takes firm roots, such aspirations also grow. The hitherto neglected sections of the populations realize their importance; demand new provinces or states want new borders and secure autonomy.
Ethnicity And Influence On Creation Of Separate States
Reasons Other Than Ethnicity
Economic and social viability rather than political considerations based on homogeneous ethnic identity must be given primacy. Parent states that lose out in terms of physical and human capital may be adequately compensated. There should be certain clear-cut parameters and safeguards to check the unfettered demands. It is better to allow democratic concerns like development, decentralisation, and governance rather than religion, caste, language, or dialect to be the valid bases for conceding the demands for a new state. Apart from this the fundamental problems of development and governance deficit such as the concentration of power, corruption, administrative inefficiency, etc also must be addressed to tackle the demand for separate statehood.
See lessTrace the evolution of the Indian political landscape from a single-party system to a multiparty system. What are the impacts of the emergence of a multi-party system on Indian polity and society?
The contemporary party system in India developed originally in the context of the struggle for freedom and since 1950 within the framework of parliamentary government. Though India was a Multi-party democracy since Independence, for all intents and purposes it can be considered as single-party democRead more
The contemporary party system in India developed originally in the context of the struggle for freedom and since 1950 within the framework of parliamentary government. Though India was a Multi-party democracy since Independence, for all intents and purposes it can be considered as single-party democracy because the influence of congress was so great it dwarfed all other national parties of the time with the only communist party of India holding little sway in certain regions of India. INC dominated Indian politics till about 1967, with the political awareness and literacy changes began to appear in the political system of India.
The Evolution Of Indian Political Landscape
The evolution of the party system in Post-Independence era can be suitably divided into various phases as follows
1952-64: The Nehruvian era of National Consensus
1964-77: An Uneasy Transition
1977-89: A Period of a New Consensus and Increasing Inter-Party Conflict
1989 to 2014: Multi-party system and Coalition politics
2014 to now: Resurgence of One-party System?
During This Evolution Indian Political Landscape Achieved New Milestones
Some Of The Limitations Of Multi-party System
Evolution of the political system in India led to the strengthening and penetration of democracy. The outlook of regional parties and coalition parties now appears to be changing from conflictual orientation to a tendency of co-operative bargaining in respect of Centre-state relations. Now the financial problems in the Centre-State relations are the main focus of attention. If destructive tendencies of communalism are kept away from the political system, then the current trajectory of political developments may prove to be the best in the unity and integrity of India.
See lessWhat are the contributions of Deen Dayal Upadhaya and Atal Bihari Vajpayee in Post-Independent India?
Deendayal Upadhyaya was not only an Indian politician but also a philosopher, journalist, sociologist, economist, and thinker. For him, morality in public life was important. Atal Bihari Vajpayee was not only a politician but also noted as a poet and a writer. He was a member of the Indian ParliamenRead more
Deendayal Upadhyaya was not only an Indian politician but also a philosopher, journalist, sociologist, economist, and thinker. For him, morality in public life was important. Atal Bihari Vajpayee was not only a politician but also noted as a poet and a writer. He was a member of the Indian Parliament for over five decades. Contributions of both the leaders in post-independence India range from politics, society to economics and overall development of the country.
Contributions Of Deen Dayal Upadhyaya
Contributions Of Atal Bihari Vajpayee
Contributions In Politics Of Independent India
Contributions In Indian Economy
Contributions In Infrastructure
Contributions In Education
Recognising his contributions Atal Bihari Vajpayee was awarded the Bharat Ratna, India’s highest civilian honour. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya’s relevance lies in the fact that in political, social and cultural discourse, he introduced the basic concept of Indian philosophy. The present government is following the ideals of both the great leaders through Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas- Development for all.
See less“Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy”. Comment.
Introduction: Judicial independence, guaranteed by the Constitution, is crucial for democracy worldwide. It ensures that judges can be fair and impartial, without being influenced unfairly. This is vital for upholding the law and protecting people's rights in the following ways. Checks and Balances:Read more
Introduction:
Judicial independence, guaranteed by the Constitution, is crucial for democracy worldwide. It ensures that judges can be fair and impartial, without being influenced unfairly. This is vital for upholding the law and protecting people’s rights in the following ways.
Conclusion: Constitutional judicial independence is vital not only to prevent government overreach but also as a foundation of democracy itself. Upholding it ensures fairness, accountability, and respect for the law. Strengthening judicial independence through clear laws, adequate resources, and public education is crucial for protecting democratic values globally.
Way Forward: To support judicial independence, governments should pass laws that shield judges from political pressure, provide enough resources for courts, and make judicial appointments transparent. Educating the public about the importance of judicial independence will also help build trust in the legal system and strengthen democracy.
“The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially.” Comment.
The reluctance of Indian states to empower urban local bodies (ULBs) both functionally and financially is a significant issue impacting urban governance and development. Here are some key points to consider: Functional Empowerment Limited Autonomy: ULBs often lack the autonomy to make decisions indeRead more
Compare and contrast the British and Indian approaches to Parliamentary sovereignty.
British Approach to Parliamentary Sovereignty Historical Context: Originating in the 17th century, British parliamentary sovereignty was established after conflicts between the monarchy and Parliament, culminating in the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the Bill of Rights 1689. Definition and Scope:Read more
British Approach to Parliamentary Sovereignty
Indian Approach to Parliamentary Sovereignty
Describe any 4 major political developments that India witnessed between the period 1989 to 1999.
India underwent a massive development after 1989, the year that turned around everything for Indian Politics. India witnessed pivotal political developments from 1989 to 1999. 1. The elections of 1989 challenged the one-party dominance era of the Indian National Congress as the party faced a humiliaRead more
India underwent a massive development after 1989, the year that turned around everything for Indian Politics. India witnessed pivotal political developments from 1989 to 1999.
1. The elections of 1989 challenged the one-party dominance era of the Indian National Congress as the party faced a humiliating defeat under the leadership of Rajiv Gandhi. This defeat also led to the rise of coalition governments as the National Front, a coalition of many parties ruled till 1990.
2. This era also improved the state of the Indian economy as Dr. Manmohan Singh was appointed Finance Minister in 1991 and initiated the concept of LPG (liberalization, privatization, and globalization) along with many economic policies.
3. The 1990s also saw the development of caste politics as V.P. Singh implemented the Mandal Commission’s report recommending the rise of reservations to 27% for OBCs. Many parties such as BSP and Janata Dal also claimed to represent the backward castes.
4. The current ruling party, BJP traces its roots back to the 1990s as the party started asserting its position by advocating for Hindu nationalism during the Babri Masjid conflict. BJP also managed to form a majority with the help of a coalition in 1989.
See lessTrace the circumstances that led to the promulgation of emergency in 1975 and discuss its implications.
The promulgation of Emergency in India in 1975 was a pivotal event in the country's history, marked by significant political, social, and constitutional implications. Here are the circumstances that led to its proclamation and its implications: Circumstances Leading to the Emergency: Political InstaRead more
The promulgation of Emergency in India in 1975 was a pivotal event in the country’s history, marked by significant political, social, and constitutional implications. Here are the circumstances that led to its proclamation and its implications:
Circumstances Leading to the Emergency:
Implications of the Emergency:
In summary, while the Emergency was justified by the government as a response to internal instability and security threats, its implementation led to widespread suppression of democratic rights and a significant backlash. It remains a critical chapter in India’s democratic history, highlighting both vulnerabilities and resilience in the face of authoritarian challenges.
See lessContrary to the expectations, the linguistic reorganisation of States kept India united. Examine.
The linguistic reorganization of states in India, which occurred primarily in the 1950s and 1960s, was a significant political and administrative process that aimed to create states based on linguistic and cultural identities. This restructuring was crucial in shaping India's political landscape andRead more
The linguistic reorganization of states in India, which occurred primarily in the 1950s and 1960s, was a significant political and administrative process that aimed to create states based on linguistic and cultural identities. This restructuring was crucial in shaping India’s political landscape and had several profound effects:
In conclusion, contrary to initial fears that linguistic reorganization might fragment India, it actually contributed to its unity by addressing regional aspirations, fostering a sense of inclusivity among linguistic communities, improving administrative efficiency, reducing ethnic tensions, and facilitating political integration. This process underscored India’s commitment to unity in diversity, where different linguistic and cultural identities could coexist within a single democratic framework.
See less