Home/Modern India/Freedom Movement/Page 4
Freedom Movement
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
What motivated Gandhiji to select salt as a symbol of protest for the Dandi Satyagraha? Additionally, explain how the Dandi March influenced the national movement. (200 words)
Model Answer Reasons Behind Gandhiji's Choice of Salt as a Protest Symbol Mahatma Gandhi selected salt as a symbol of protest during the Dandi Satyagraha for its universal significance in India and to strategically mobilize the masses. Salt was an essential item in every Indian household, regardlessRead more
Model Answer
Reasons Behind Gandhiji’s Choice of Salt as a Protest Symbol
Mahatma Gandhi selected salt as a symbol of protest during the Dandi Satyagraha for its universal significance in India and to strategically mobilize the masses. Salt was an essential item in every Indian household, regardless of caste, religion, or region, making it an ideal unifying factor. Yet, the British Salt Act of 1882 imposed a heavy tax on salt and restricted Indians from freely producing it from seawater. By targeting this oppressive policy, Gandhi was able to expose the unfair practices of British rule that affected the daily lives of all Indians (source: Dandi Satyagraha history). Additionally, salt was an essential commodity with which he could channel the people’s discontent against the British, whose monopoly on salt production generated 8.2% of their tax revenue. Gandhi’s approach aimed to disrupt this key economic stream, creating an unavoidable statement of dissent (source: Analysis on Salt Tax).
Impact of the Dandi March on the Indian National Movement
The Dandi March, beginning on March 12, 1930, marked a transformative period in India’s independence movement. Its impact extended to multiple fronts:
The Dandi Satyagraha inspired similar regional marches. Leaders like C. Rajagopalachari in Tamil Nadu, K. Kelappan in Malabar, and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan in the North-West Frontier Province organized marches to protest the salt tax. These protests were not limited to one region but spread to Assam and Andhra Pradesh, making salt production a powerful act of civil disobedience nationwide (source: Freedom Movement documentation).
Unlike previous protests, the Salt March witnessed mass involvement from peasants, workers, students, merchants, and shopkeepers, establishing Congress as a truly national movement. Women participated significantly, with leaders like Sarojini Naidu amplifying the movement’s reach (source: Congress archives).
International attention grew, with global publications like “Time” magazine covering the Dandi March and highlighting the plight of Indians. This exposure pressured the British into organizing Round Table Conferences, eventually leading to partial Indian representation in administration under the Government of India Act, of 1935, which paved the way toward complete independence (source: Time Magazine archives).
In essence, the Dandi Satyagraha symbolized the irreversibility of India’s push for independence, mobilizing both national and international support for Indian self-governance.
See lessWhat innovative strategies were employed during the Swadeshi movement? Do you believe the movement successfully accomplished its goals? (200 words)
Model Answer Innovative Strategies in the Swadeshi Movement The Swadeshi movement, initiated in 1905 as a response to the partition of Bengal, employed several innovative strategies to galvanize public sentiment against British rule. Key methods included: Boycotts: A widespread boycott of foreign goRead more
Model Answer
Innovative Strategies in the Swadeshi Movement
The Swadeshi movement, initiated in 1905 as a response to the partition of Bengal, employed several innovative strategies to galvanize public sentiment against British rule. Key methods included:
Success of the Movement
The Swadeshi movement achieved significant milestones, broadening the social base of the nationalist struggle by involving women and students. It marked the first pan-India freedom movement, with leaders like Lala Lajpat Rai and Tilak extending its influence beyond Bengal (Guha, 2010). Additionally, it catalyzed various strands of Indian nationalism, incorporating art, literature, and education into its framework.
However, challenges persisted. The movement deepened divisions within the Congress, culminating in the Surat Split of 1907. The participation of the upper and middle classes limited its reach to the peasantry, and the reliance on Hindu symbols often alienated Muslim communities (Nanda, 2000).
In summary, while the Swadeshi movement laid important groundwork for India’s independence, its full potential was not realized due to internal divisions and societal limitations. Nonetheless, it significantly shaped the trajectory of India’s struggle against colonial rule.
See lessDiscuss the role of Individual Satyagraha in sustaining the national movement between the August Offer and the Cripps Mission. (200 words)
Model Answer The Individual Satyagraha played a crucial role in sustaining the Indian national movement between the August Offer and the Cripps Mission during World War II. This period was marked by significant political developments, including the British government's attempts to secure Indian suppRead more
Model Answer
The Individual Satyagraha played a crucial role in sustaining the Indian national movement between the August Offer and the Cripps Mission during World War II. This period was marked by significant political developments, including the British government’s attempts to secure Indian support amidst the war’s challenges.
Context of the August Offer
In August 1940, the British Viceroy, Lord Linlithgow, proposed the August Offer, which acknowledged for the first time the right of Indians to frame their own constitution and suggested the expansion of the Executive Council. However, the offer lacked clarity and included provisions that allowed minority groups to veto any constitutional changes, leading to its rejection by both the Indian National Congress (INC) and the Muslim League.
Launch of Individual Satyagraha
In response to the dissatisfaction with the August Offer, Gandhi initiated the Individual Satyagraha in late 1940. This movement was designed to maintain the momentum of the freedom struggle without resorting to mass protests that could lead to violence. Gandhi believed that a mass movement might embarrass Britain and preferred a more controlled approach. The Satyagraha allowed selected individuals to express dissent against the British government by issuing anti-war declarations, thereby utilizing the freedom of speech as a form of protest.
Key Figures and Impact
The first Satyagrahi was Acharya Vinoba Bhave, followed by Jawaharlal Nehru and Brahma Datt, all of whom were imprisoned for their actions. This individual approach not only kept the spirit of non-violent resistance alive but also highlighted the Indian nationalist stance against the war, distinguishing between the fight against fascism and the autocratic rule of the British.
Sustaining the Movement
The Individual Satyagraha effectively sustained the national movement during a critical juncture. It demonstrated the INC’s commitment to non-violence while keeping the dialogue open with the British government. This period of protest laid the groundwork for the subsequent Cripps Mission, which ultimately failed to meet Indian demands for complete independence, leading to the call for the Quit India Movement in 1942.
In summary, the Individual Satyagraha was instrumental in maintaining the momentum of the Indian independence movement during a time of political uncertainty, reinforcing the principles of non-violence and civil disobedience.
See lessTrace the evolution of the working class in India and discuss its involvement in the struggle for independence. (200 words)
Model Answer Evolution of the Working Class in India The working class in India began to take shape in the latter half of the 19th century, primarily due to the growth of modern industry under British colonial rule. This evolution was closely tied to the broader Indian national movement. Evolution oRead more
Model Answer
Evolution of the Working Class in India
The working class in India began to take shape in the latter half of the 19th century, primarily due to the growth of modern industry under British colonial rule. This evolution was closely tied to the broader Indian national movement.
Evolution of the Working Class
The destruction of the traditional village economy, driven by British free trade policies, forced many impoverished rural workers to migrate to urban areas in search of employment. This migration laid the foundation for the industrial working class, particularly in cities like Bombay and Calcutta, where demand for cheap labor surged (Source: “The Working Class of India: History and Perspective” by R. K. Sharma). Initially unorganized and exploited, especially women and children, the working conditions began to improve with the introduction of legislation like the Factories Act of 1881 and the Factories Act of 1891.
As the working class became more organized, they shifted focus from purely economic issues to broader political concerns. This transformation was evident in significant strikes and protests, such as the Ahmedabad mill strike. The establishment of trade unions post-World War I, exemplified by the formation of the All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) in 1920, marked a consolidation of the working class. During the 1920s and 30s, communist ideologies began to influence the working class, promoting political activism (Source: “Trade Union Movement in India” by A. K. Sen).
Involvement in the Freedom Struggle
The working class actively participated in key national movements, including the Swadeshi Movement, Non-Cooperation Movement, and Quit India Movement. For instance, railway workers protested during the Rowlatt Agitation, showcasing their commitment to the national cause (Source: “The Role of Working Class in India’s Freedom Struggle” by P. S. Gupta).
Strikes and hartals became common as workers sought to address both economic and political grievances, exemplified by strikes in government presses and textile mills. Lala Lajpat Rai, president of AITUC, notably critiqued the link between capitalism and imperialism, positioning the working class as a vital force against colonial rule.
Trade unions proliferated in 1919-20, further embedding workers in the national political landscape. Many prominent leaders, including C.R. Das and Subhash Chandra Bose, collaborated with the AITUC, urging workers to engage in political activism.
Though the emergence of a strong leftist movement in the late 1920s caused some tensions with the Congress Party, the working class remained essential to the freedom struggle, particularly in the post-World War II period during the INA trials and the naval ratings’ mutiny in 1946 (Source: “The Indian National Movement: A History” by B. R. Nanda).
In summary, the working class evolved from a fragmented group into a politically conscious force, playing a pivotal role in India’s struggle for independence.
See lessWhat factors made the launch of the Quit India Movement inevitable, despite the challenging circumstances of the time? (200 words)
Model Answer The launch of the Quit India Movement in August 1942 became inevitable despite the challenging circumstances due to several key factors: 1. Failure of the Cripps Mission The Cripps Mission, sent by the British government to negotiate with Indian leaders, failed to provide a satisfactoryRead more
Model Answer
The launch of the Quit India Movement in August 1942 became inevitable despite the challenging circumstances due to several key factors:
1. Failure of the Cripps Mission
The Cripps Mission, sent by the British government to negotiate with Indian leaders, failed to provide a satisfactory solution for Indian self-governance. The offer was seen as an empty gesture, leading to disillusionment among leaders like Gandhi and Nehru, who had initially supported the war effort against fascism but felt betrayed by the lack of genuine concessions.
2. Rising Discontent and Economic Hardship
The Indian populace was experiencing significant hardships due to rising prices and wartime shortages. The government’s heavy-handed actions, such as seizing boats in Bengal and Orissa to prevent Japanese use, further fueled public anger and dissatisfaction with British rule.
3. News of Allied Reverses
Reports of British military setbacks, including the withdrawal of troops from Southeast Asia, created a sense of impending British collapse. This speculation heightened the urgency for a movement that could galvanize public sentiment against colonial rule.
4. Japanese Aggression
As Japanese forces advanced in Southeast Asia, there was widespread fear that they might not face resistance from demoralized Indian masses. Leaders believed that a strong movement was necessary to boost morale and prepare for potential invasions.
5. Erosion of Faith in British Rule
The stability of British rule was increasingly questioned, evidenced by a run on banks and a withdrawal of deposits. This growing skepticism among the populace indicated a readiness for a decisive movement against colonial authority.
6. Impatience Among Leadership
The British evacuation of white residents from Malaya and Burma, while leaving Indian subjects vulnerable, raised alarms among Indian leaders about the potential for similar treatment in India. This sense of betrayal contributed to the urgency for action.
In summary, the combination of failed negotiations, economic distress, military setbacks, and a loss of faith in British authority created a perfect storm that made the Quit India Movement not only necessary but inevitable.
See lessHighlight the differences in the approach of Subhash Chandra Bose and Mahatma Gandhi in the struggle for freedom. (200 words) [UPSC 2016]
The Indian independence movement was a decades long struggle against British colonial rule. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and Subash Chandra Bose, Indians employed non violent resistance and armed rebellion to achieve freedom in 1947.Subhash Chandra Bose and Mahatma Gandhi adopting distincRead more
The Indian independence movement was a decades long struggle against British colonial rule. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and Subash Chandra Bose, Indians employed non violent resistance and armed rebellion to achieve freedom in 1947.Subhash Chandra Bose and Mahatma Gandhi adopting distinct methods to achieve freedom –
The Indian independence movement, led by Subhash Chandra Bose and Mahatma Gandhi achieved the ultimate goal of freeing India from British rule. However, limitations included the partition of India, ongoing social and economic inequalities and the challenge of nation building which continued beyond independence.
See lessIndia's struggle for freedom
Some important events and people in India's struggle for freedom include: Mahatma Gandhi A national leader who led the successful campaign for India's independence. He launched the Non-Cooperation Movement and the Civil Disobedience Movement, which were crucial to India's independence.Read more
Some important events and people in India’s struggle for freedom include:
Mahatma Gandhi
A national leader who led the successful campaign for India’s independence. He launched the Non-Cooperation Movement and the Civil Disobedience Movement, which were crucial to India’s independence.
Subhas Chandra Bose
A prominent hero who founded the Azad Hind Fauj, also known as the Indian National Army (INA), to fight the British.
Bhagat Singh
A revolutionary who believed in armed rebellion as the only way to drive the British out of India.
Chandrashekhar Azad
A freedom fighter who inspired thousands of Indians to join the freedom movement.
Lala Lajpat Rai
A member of the Indian National Congress who participated in protests against the Bengal partition. He also established the Punjab National Bank.
See lessWhy did the ‘Moderates’ fail to carry conviction with the nation about their proclaimed ideology and political goals by the end of the nineteenth century? (150 words) [UPSC 2017]
Reasons for the Failure of the Moderates to Convince the Nation By the end of the nineteenth century, the 'Moderates' in Indian politics failed to gain widespread support for their ideology and goals due to several reasons: **1. Ineffectiveness of Reforms The Moderates, led by figures like DadabhaiRead more
Reasons for the Failure of the Moderates to Convince the Nation
By the end of the nineteenth century, the ‘Moderates’ in Indian politics failed to gain widespread support for their ideology and goals due to several reasons:
**1. Ineffectiveness of Reforms
The Moderates, led by figures like Dadabhai Naoroji and Gopal Krishna Gokhale, advocated for gradual reforms and constitutional methods. However, the limited reforms offered by the British, such as the Indian Councils Act of 1892, were insufficient in addressing the pressing needs of the Indian masses. For example, the 1892 Act only marginally increased Indian representation but failed to address core issues like self-governance and economic exploitation.
**2. Economic Exploitation
The economic policies of the British Raj, including heavy taxation and land revenue systems, led to widespread poverty and economic distress. The Moderate leaders’ focus on constitutional reforms was seen as inadequate in addressing the dire economic conditions, evident from the famines of the 1890s that devastated large parts of India.
**3. Political Apathy and Discontent
The general public’s growing discontent with British rule, driven by increasing political awareness and socio-economic hardships, made the Moderate approach seem overly conservative. The rise of extremist leaders, like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, who demanded more radical changes, reflected the shift in public sentiment towards more assertive forms of resistance.
**4. Lack of Mass Mobilization
The Moderates failed to connect with the broader masses and lacked a strong grassroots support base. Their emphasis on petitions and reforms did not resonate with the rising tide of nationalist sentiment that sought immediate and substantial changes.
These factors contributed to the decline in the Moderates’ influence and paved the way for more radical approaches in the early 20th century.
See lessHighlight the importance of the new objectives that were added to the vision of Indian independence since the twenties of the last century. (250 words) [UPSC 2017]
Importance of New Objectives Added to the Vision of Indian Independence Since the 1920s Since the 1920s, the vision of Indian independence has evolved significantly to address a broader range of socio-economic and political issues. The inclusion of new objectives has been crucial in shaping a compreRead more
Importance of New Objectives Added to the Vision of Indian Independence Since the 1920s
Since the 1920s, the vision of Indian independence has evolved significantly to address a broader range of socio-economic and political issues. The inclusion of new objectives has been crucial in shaping a comprehensive and inclusive vision for the nation’s future.
1. Economic Development and Industrialization: The 1920s and 1930s saw the emergence of economic objectives as key aspects of the independence movement. Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru advocated for industrialization and economic self-sufficiency. The introduction of Five-Year Plans post-independence reflected this vision, leading to significant infrastructure development and economic growth. Recent initiatives like the Make in India campaign continue this legacy by aiming to boost domestic manufacturing and attract foreign investment.
2. Social Justice and Equality: The objectives of the independence movement were expanded to include social justice and equality. The 1920s witnessed a growing focus on addressing social inequalities and untouchability. The post-independence period saw the implementation of various affirmative action policies and social reforms aimed at improving the status of marginalized communities. The Reservation System and initiatives like the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) are examples of ongoing efforts to promote social equality.
3. Democratic Governance and Political Participation: The vision for independence increasingly emphasized the importance of democratic governance and political participation. The adoption of the Indian Constitution in 1950 enshrined democratic principles and expanded the political rights of citizens. The recent emphasis on electoral reforms and strengthening democratic institutions underscores the continued relevance of these objectives.
4. National Integration and Unity: The 1920s also marked a period of heightened focus on national integration. Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi promoted the idea of a united India, transcending regional and communal divisions. Modern initiatives such as the Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat program reflect this ongoing commitment to fostering national unity.
These expanded objectives have played a pivotal role in shaping India’s journey towards a more equitable, inclusive, and prosperous nation.
See lessIn what ways did the naval mutiny prove to be the last nail in the coffin of British colonial aspirations in India? (150 words) [UPSC 2014]
Impact of the Naval Mutiny on British Colonial Aspirations in India **1. Catalyst for Nationalist Movement The Naval Mutiny of 1946 (also known as the Royal Indian Navy Revolt) significantly heightened anti-colonial sentiment across India. The mutiny, involving naval ratings and soldiers protestingRead more
Impact of the Naval Mutiny on British Colonial Aspirations in India
**1. Catalyst for Nationalist Movement
The Naval Mutiny of 1946 (also known as the Royal Indian Navy Revolt) significantly heightened anti-colonial sentiment across India. The mutiny, involving naval ratings and soldiers protesting against poor conditions and racial discrimination, led to widespread unrest. The revolt united diverse nationalist factions and galvanized public opinion against British rule, marking a crucial step towards the end of colonial dominance.
**2. Disruption of British Authority
The mutiny caused severe disruption to British control over strategic naval assets. British forces struggled to suppress the uprising, revealing their vulnerability. The rebellion, along with concurrent strikes and protests, undermined the British administration’s ability to maintain order and control, demonstrating the weakening of their authority.
**3. Political Concessions
In response to the escalating unrest, the British government was compelled to make significant political concessions. The Labour Government in Britain, facing pressure from the Indian independence movement and the naval revolt, accelerated discussions on Indian self-rule, leading to the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946 and eventually the granting of independence to India in 1947.
**4. Public Mobilization
The mutiny spurred nationwide mobilization against colonial rule. It intensified the struggle for independence, with leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose leveraging the increased unrest to push for a quicker end to British rule. This heightened pressure was pivotal in hastening the end of British colonial rule.
In summary, the Naval Mutiny of 1946 exposed the fragility of British control, unified nationalist forces, and accelerated the process of India’s independence, marking it as a decisive blow to British colonial ambitions.
See less