Growth of Militant Nationalism & Revolutionary Activities (1905-1918)
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Analyze the British response to the growing threat of revolutionary activities, including the introduction of repressive measures and the use of counter-intelligence.
Here is the answer to the question for UPSC Mains aspirants, with the key points and headings bolded: British Response to the Growing Threat of Revolutionary Activities: Repressive Measures Sedition Act (1870): The British government introduced the Sedition Act, which criminalized any speech or writRead more
Here is the answer to the question for UPSC Mains aspirants, with the key points and headings bolded:
British Response to the Growing Threat of Revolutionary Activities:
Impact of British Repressive Measures and Counter-Intelligence Efforts:
Recent example: The Indian government’s continued use of repressive measures and counter-intelligence efforts to suppress dissent and criticism, which has been met with criticism from human rights organizations and the international community.
Recent example: The ongoing protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in India, which have been driven in part by a perception of the government’s authoritarian tendencies and disregard for civil liberties.
Recent example: The Indian government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been criticized for its lack of transparency and the perceived prioritization of political considerations over public health concerns, has contributed to a further erosion of public trust.
Overall, the British government’s response to the growing threat of revolutionary activities, while initially successful in containing the immediate threat, ultimately contributed to the radicalization of the nationalist movement and the erosion of public trust in the government, with lasting consequences for the country’s political and social dynamics.
See lessEvaluate the role of the First World War in providing new opportunities and challenges for the militant nationalist movement.
Here is the answer to the question for UPSC Mains aspirants, with the key points and headings bolded: Role of the First World War in Providing New Opportunities for the Militant Nationalist Movement: Weakening of the British Empire: The First World War significantly weakened the British Empire, bothRead more
Here is the answer to the question for UPSC Mains aspirants, with the key points and headings bolded:
Role of the First World War in Providing New Opportunities for the Militant Nationalist Movement:
Recent example: The ongoing protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in India, which have been fueled by the government’s perceived weakening of democratic institutions and the rule of law.
Recent example: The farmers’ protests in India, which have seen the participation of a large number of farmers and rural communities, reflecting the increased mobilization of the Indian masses.
Recent example: The rise of Hindu nationalist movements in India, which have adopted a more radical and confrontational approach to the nationalist struggle, as seen in the ongoing debates over the CAA and the NRC.
Challenges Faced by the Militant Nationalist Movement:
Recent example: The government’s use of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and other laws to crackdown on civil society organizations and activists, which has been criticized by human rights organizations as a violation of democratic principles.
Recent example: The ongoing tensions between the different factions of the Indian National Congress, as well as the emergence of regional and ideological political parties, which have posed challenges to the unity of the nationalist movement.
Recent example: The ongoing geopolitical tensions between India and China, which have had implications for the country’s domestic political landscape and the nationalist movement.
Overall, the First World War provided both new opportunities and challenges for the militant nationalist movement in India, leading to a complex and evolving landscape that continues to shape the country’s political and social dynamics
See lessDiscuss the significance of the Ghadar movement and its impact on the nationalist struggle, particularly among the Indian diaspora.
The Ghadar movement was a significant event in the Indian nationalist struggle, particularly in its impact on the Indian diaspora. Here is a discussion of the movement's significance and its influence on the broader nationalist movement: Origins and objectives: The Ghadar movement was launched in 19Read more
The Ghadar movement was a significant event in the Indian nationalist struggle, particularly in its impact on the Indian diaspora. Here is a discussion of the movement’s significance and its influence on the broader nationalist movement:
The Ghadar movement was launched in 1913 by Indian immigrants, primarily Punjabi Sikhs, living in the United States and Canada. Its primary objective was to organize an armed revolution to overthrow the British colonial rule in India.
The Ghadar movement was highly effective in mobilizing the Indian diaspora, especially in North America, to support the cause of Indian independence. It tapped into the sense of alienation and discrimination experienced by many Indian immigrants, and channeled their nationalist sentiments into a revolutionary agenda.
The Ghadar movement established strong transnational connections between the Indian diaspora and the independence movement in India. It facilitated the flow of resources, information, and recruits between the two fronts, enhancing the overall capacity and reach of the nationalist struggle.
The Ghadar movement’s embrace of armed revolution represented a significant departure from the predominantly nonviolent civil disobedience campaigns led by Gandhi and the Indian National Congress. This radical approach helped to diversify the strategies and tactics employed in the nationalist struggle.
While the Ghadar movement itself was ultimately suppressed by the British authorities, it had a lasting impact on the broader nationalist movement. It contributed to the radicalization of certain segments of the independence struggle, and helped to sustain the momentum of the revolutionary impulse even in the face of setbacks.
The Ghadar movement’s legacy lived on, inspiring subsequent generations of Indian revolutionaries, such as the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association and the Bhagat Singh-led Shaheed movement. Its influence can be seen in the continued importance of armed struggle as a tactic within the nationalist movement.
Overall, the Ghadar movement played a significant role in galvanizing the Indian diaspora, broadening the strategies employed in the nationalist struggle, and maintaining the revolutionary spirit that ultimately contributed to the achievement of Indian independence.
See lessAssess the relationship between the militant nationalist movement and the broader non-violent civil disobedience campaigns led by Gandhi and the Congress.
The connection between Gandhi's and the Indian National Congress's larger nonviolent civil disobedience operations and the violent nationalist movement in India is a complex and nuanced one. Here are some key points to consider: Shared goal of independence: Both the nonviolent civil disobedience movRead more
The connection between Gandhi’s and the Indian National Congress’s larger nonviolent civil disobedience operations and the violent nationalist movement in India is a complex and nuanced one. Here are some key points to consider:
It is important to note that the relationship between the nonviolent and violent nationalist movements was not one of simple opposition or antagonism. Instead, it was a complex, dynamic, and evolving relationship, where the two strands of the independence struggle coexisted, sometimes in tension, and at other times, in a more symbiotic manner.
See lessGrowth of Militant Nationalism
The growth of militant nationalism in India was fueled by British colonial policies that exploited and repressed the population, socio-political conditions marked by economic distress and perceived inadequacies of moderate reform efforts, and the influence of revolutionary ideas from global movementRead more
The growth of militant nationalism in India was fueled by British colonial policies that exploited and repressed the population, socio-political conditions marked by economic distress and perceived inadequacies of moderate reform efforts, and the influence of revolutionary ideas from global movements. Economic exploitation, such as high taxation and deindustrialization, alongside political repression like the Rowlatt Act, created widespread discontent. This was compounded by the failure of moderate leaders to bring about significant change, leading to the rise of radical groups influenced by global revolutionary successes. Cultural and religious revivalism, the economic strain of World War I, and incidents like the Jallianwala Bagh massacre further intensified nationalist fervor, leading to the rise of militant organizations advocating for direct action and armed struggle against colonial rule.
See lessWhat should be do for preparation of entrance?
At first understand the entramce exam pattern After that understand the syllabus Make a schedule and start working hard and smart work is also necessary leave the rest of the gods.
At first understand the entramce exam pattern After that understand the syllabus Make a schedule and start working hard and smart work is also necessary leave the rest of the gods.
See lessWhy are companies laying off their entire project teams?
During a recession, companies lay off employees primarily to manage costs and ensure survival. Revenue drops as consumer spending decreases, prompting businesses to reduce expenses, and labor is one of the largest costs. Layoffs help immediately cut payroll expenses and preserve cash flow, which isRead more
During a recession, companies lay off employees primarily to manage costs and ensure survival. Revenue drops as consumer spending decreases, prompting businesses to reduce expenses, and labor is one of the largest costs. Layoffs help immediately cut payroll expenses and preserve cash flow, which is crucial during economic uncertainty.
With lower demand for products and services, companies need fewer employees. Aligning the workforce with reduced demand helps maintain operational efficiency. Additionally, recessions often trigger restructuring efforts to streamline operations and eliminate redundancies, further driving layoffs.
Publicly traded companies face investor pressure to maintain profitability and protect stock prices. Layoffs signal decisive cost management, reassuring investors about the company’s financial health. For some businesses, layoffs are essential to avoid bankruptcy, ensuring they can continue operations during the downturn.
While layoffs are common, they can harm employee morale, company reputation, and long-term performance. Some companies explore alternatives like reducing executive salaries, cutting non-essential expenses, or implementing temporary furloughs to mitigate these impacts. Ultimately, layoffs are a strategic move to balance immediate cost reduction with the goal of emerging stronger post-recession.
See lessCritically evaluate the strategies employed by the extremist leaders to create a sense of national unity and identity.
The Extremists were a faction of Indian nationalists who emerged in the early 20th century, opposing the moderate tactics of the Indian National Congress. Dissatisfied with the slow pace of progress, they advocated for a more militant and confrontational approach to ending British rule. The ERead more
The Extremists were a faction of Indian nationalists who emerged in the early 20th century, opposing the moderate tactics of the Indian National Congress. Dissatisfied with the slow pace of progress, they advocated for a more militant and confrontational approach to ending British rule.
The Extremists believed that true independence could only be achieved through mass mobilization and direct action by the Indian populace. They promoted boycotts of British goods, organized strikes, and endorsed various forms of civil disobedience to disrupt colonial governance. Additionally, they sought to revive traditional Indian symbols and festivals to foster a strong sense of national pride and unity.
Key figures among the Extremists included Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, and Lala Lajpat Rai. Their activism and ideas significantly influenced the Indian independence movement, fostering a feeling of identity and national cohesion.
Strategies employed by the extremist leaders to create a sense of national unity and identity are-
Non-Constitutional Tactics
In contrast to the Moderates, who relied on constitutional methods, the Extremists employed more radical and unconventional tactics to confront British rule. They organized strikes, boycotts, and the burning of foreign goods, and promoted various forms of non-cooperation. These aggressive actions were designed to disrupt the colonial administration and apply direct pressure on the British authorities, thereby escalating the demand for independence.
Cultural Movement
Extremist leaders, notably Bal Gangadhar Tilak, placed great emphasis on reviving and celebrating Indian culture and heritage. Tilak transformed festivals like Ganpati Puja into large-scale public events, turning them into platforms for political mobilization. These celebrations not only reinforced a sense of pride in Indian traditions and values but also served as a counter-narrative to the pervasive influence of Westernization. By glorifying historical figures such as Shivaji, who symbolized resistance and self-rule, Tilak and his peers aimed to inspire Indians with the valor and heroism of their ancestors, thereby fostering a collective national consciousness.
Use of Nationalist Slogans
The Extremists were adept at using powerful slogans to galvanize public sentiment and unify the nation. Tilak’s declaration, “Swaraj is my birthright and I shall have it,” became a potent rallying cry for the freedom struggle. This slogan encapsulated the demand for self-rule and resonated deeply with the Indian populace, igniting a fervent desire for independence. It instilled a sense of determination and purpose among the masses, transforming the quest for freedom into a personal and collective mission for every Indian.
Direct Confrontation
Extremist leaders favored direct confrontation over persuasion. They openly defied and opposed British imperial policies in India, engaging in direct clashes with the colonial administration. Their approach was marked by a willingness to confront the British authorities head-on, rejecting any form of compromise or accommodation.
Boycott Movements
The strategy of boycotting British goods and institutions was a cornerstone of the Extremist approach. By promoting the boycott of British products, including textiles and manufactured goods, the Extremists aimed to weaken the economic foundation of colonial rule. This movement led to a resurgence of indigenous industries and crafts, providing employment and stimulating the local economy. Additionally, the boycott of British educational institutions underscored the rejection of colonial indoctrination, encouraging the pursuit of an education system that reflected Indian values and aspirations. The boycott movements not only served as a form of economic resistance but also as a powerful protest against British exploitation and policies.
Educational Reforms
Education reform was another critical area of focus for the Extremists. They recognized the need for an education system that would foster nationalism and self-reliance among Indians. To this end, they advocated for the establishment of national universities that operated independently of British control. These institutions aimed to provide an education that was aligned with Indian cultural and intellectual traditions, thus nurturing a generation of self-reliant and patriotic citizens. By reforming the education system, the Extremists sought to dismantle the colonial mindset and cultivate a sense of national identity and pride.
Mass mobilization
The success of the Extremist leaders lay in their ability to mobilize a broad spectrum of Indian society, including the lower middle class and rural populations. Through their dynamic leadership and persuasive rhetoric, they brought a diverse array of people into the fold of the nationalist movement. This inclusive approach ensured that the freedom struggle was not limited to the urban elite but was truly representative of the aspirations and grievances of the masses. The involvement of a larger and more varied demographic base gave the movement its strength and legitimacy, making it a powerful force against colonial rule.
Conclusion
Thus, strategies employed by the Extremist leaders were instrumental in creating a sense of national unity and identity during the Indian freedom struggle. Through cultural revival, the popularization of nationalist slogans, boycott movements, education reforms, and the mobilization of the masses, they were able to challenge British authority and inspire a collective quest for independence. Their contributions laid a strong foundation for the subsequent phases of the freedom movement, ultimately leading to India’s independence. The legacy of the Extremists remains a testament to the power of cultural pride, economic self-reliance, and mass mobilization in the fight for national sovereignty.
See lessBringing out the factors that culminated into the Surat Split of the Indian National Congress, discuss its consequences for the national movement.
The Surat Split of the Indian National Congress in 1907 into Moderate and Extremist factions took place in the aftermath of the partition of Bengal. Around that time, the country was in the grip of the Swadeshi and Boycott movements against the British government, and militant nationalism was on theRead more
The Surat Split of the Indian National Congress in 1907 into Moderate and Extremist factions took place in the aftermath of the partition of Bengal. Around that time, the country was in the grip of the Swadeshi and Boycott movements against the British government, and militant nationalism was on the rise.
The various factors leading to the Split include:
The Split of 1907 dealt a blow to the Congress and India’s freedom struggle. Its consequences were the following:
However, Indian leadership learnt from its mistakes and when a similar situation arose in 1924 with respect to the Swarajists and in 1936 between Nehru and Leftists, they remained united against the British despite their differences.
See lessDespite having a popular mass character, the Swadeshi movement fizzled out by mid-1908.
Answer: The Swadeshi Movement had its genesis in the anti-partition movement (1905) which started to oppose the British's decision to partition Bengal. With the start of the Swadeshi movement at the turn of the century, the Indian National movement took a major leap forward. Popular mass character oRead more
Answer: The Swadeshi Movement had its genesis in the anti-partition movement (1905) which started to oppose the British’s decision to partition Bengal. With the start of the Swadeshi movement at the turn of the century, the Indian National movement took a major leap forward. Popular mass character of the movement:
However, by mid-1908, the movement fizzled out owing to various reasons:
However, it would be wrong to see the Swadeshi Movement as a failure. The movement made a major contribution in the development of the idea of nationalism and taking it to hitherto untouched masses.
See less