Talk about the primary means through which the Indian Parliament manages the executive branch. (200 Words) [UPPSC 2021]
In India, the dissolution of the Lok Sabha (lower house of Parliament) and state legislative assemblies is governed by specific provisions in the Constitution, aimed at ensuring democratic governance and political stability. Here’s an analysis of these provisions, the circumstances under which dissoRead more
In India, the dissolution of the Lok Sabha (lower house of Parliament) and state legislative assemblies is governed by specific provisions in the Constitution, aimed at ensuring democratic governance and political stability. Here’s an analysis of these provisions, the circumstances under which dissolution can occur, the implications for the political system, and a comparison with mechanisms in other parliamentary democracies:
Dissolution of the Lok Sabha (Parliament):
Circumstances for Dissolution:
Completion of Term: The Lok Sabha has a maximum term of five years from the date of its first meeting. It automatically dissolves at the end of this term, unless dissolved earlier.
Early Dissolution: The President can dissolve the Lok Sabha before the completion of its term if advised by the Prime Minister, usually when the government loses majority support in the house and cannot prove its majority.
Implications for the Political System:
Elections: Upon dissolution, elections must be held within six months to constitute a new Lok Sabha.
Political Stability: Dissolution can lead to political uncertainty and realignment of political alliances. It tests the strength of political parties and the government’s mandate.
Role of the President:
Discretionary Power: The President has discretion in deciding whether to dissolve the Lok Sabha based on the advice of the Council of Ministers led by the Prime Minister.
Constitutional Safeguards: The President ensures that dissolution is in accordance with constitutional provisions and political conventions.
Dissolution of State Legislative Assemblies:
Similar Provisions:
State legislative assemblies also have a maximum term of five years, unless dissolved earlier.
Governors have similar discretionary powers as the President to dissolve state assemblies based on the advice of the Chief Minister or Council of Ministers.
Implications and Role of Governors:
Governor’s Discretion: Governors play a crucial role in state assemblies’ dissolution, ensuring it aligns with constitutional provisions and political conventions.
Elections: Elections to state assemblies must be conducted within six months of dissolution to constitute a new assembly.
Comparison with Other Parliamentary Democracies:
United Kingdom:
Dissolution Mechanism: The UK Parliament can be dissolved either automatically at the end of a fixed term (five years) or earlier by the Prime Minister’s request to the monarch.
Role of Monarch: The monarch’s role is largely ceremonial in dissolving Parliament, following constitutional conventions.
Canada:
Dissolution Mechanism: The Canadian Parliament can be dissolved by the Governor General (representing the monarch) on the advice of the Prime Minister.
Fixed Terms: Parliament has fixed four-year terms, but elections can be called earlier through dissolution.
Australia:
Dissolution Mechanism: Similar to Canada, the Australian Parliament can be dissolved by the Governor General on the advice of the Prime Minister.
Fixed Terms: Parliament has fixed three-year terms, but elections can be called earlier through dissolution.
Conclusion:
The provisions for the dissolution of the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies in India ensure periodic renewal of democratic mandates while maintaining stability. The roles of the President and state governors in these processes are pivotal in upholding constitutional norms and ensuring democratic governance. Compared to other parliamentary democracies like the UK, Canada, and Australia, India’s mechanisms share similarities in terms of executive discretion in dissolution but differ in terms of specific constitutional provisions and political conventions. Each country adapts these mechanisms to its unique constitutional framework and historical context, reflecting the diverse practices within parliamentary democracies worldwide.
भारतीय संसद द्वारा कार्यपालिका पर नियंत्रण के मुख्य तरीके 1. विधायी निरीक्षण (Legislative Oversight): संसदीय समितियाँ: संसद विभिन्न समितियाँ जैसे लोक लेखा समिति (PAC) और वित्तीय समिति का गठन करती है, जो सरकारी योजनाओं, बजट और खर्चों की जांच करती हैं। उदाहरण: 2022 में, PAC ने कोविड-19 महामारी के दौराRead more
भारतीय संसद द्वारा कार्यपालिका पर नियंत्रण के मुख्य तरीके
1. विधायी निरीक्षण (Legislative Oversight):
2. सवाल और उत्तर प्रणाली (Question and Answer System):
3. वेतन और संसद की अनुमति (Control over Expenditure):
4. अविश्वास प्रस्ताव (No-confidence Motion):
5. संसदीय बहस और चर्चा (Parliamentary Debate and Discussion):
निष्कर्ष: भारतीय संसद के पास कार्यपालिका पर नियंत्रण के कई प्रभावशाली तरीके हैं, जैसे विधायी निरीक्षण, सवाल-उत्तर प्रणाली, वित्तीय नियंत्रण, अविश्वास प्रस्ताव और संसदीय बहस। ये तरीके सरकार की जिम्मेदारी और पारदर्शिता को सुनिश्चित करते हैं, जिससे लोकतांत्रिक प्रक्रियाओं की मजबूती बनी रहती है।
See less