Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The Indian polity is a federal, parliamentary democracy. The legislative branch, the Parliament, consists of the Lok Sabha (lower house) and the Rajya Sabha (upper house), with the Lok Sabha being the more powerful.
India’s federal structure grants significant autonomy to its 28 states and 8 union territories, each with its own elected government and legislative assembly.
ocal governance is further decentralized through the Panchayati Raj system, empowering communities at the district, block, and village levels.
The US constitution’s bill of rights and the Indian constitution’s fundamental rights should be compared and contrasted.
Talk about the duties carried out by the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and how it influences Indian policymaking. (Answer in 150 words)
Talk about whether India’s strict separation of powers—as defined by the Indian constitution—really separates powers from functions or if there is more of a separation of functions.
Analyze the historical factors that influenced the Indian Constitution’s design.
(i) Following are some historical forces which shaped the vision of the Constitution. Certain basic values were accepted by all national leaders as a result of the Nehru Report and the Fundamental Rights Resolution passed the Karachi session of the Indian National Congress. (ii) Universal Adult FranRead more
Despite being a major component of the Indian Constitution, fundamental rights are also subject to criticism. Give specifics
Fundamental rights, governed under Part III of the Indian Constitution are vital in safeguarding the liberties and freedoms of Indian citizens. These rights form the cornerstone of democratic governance protecting life and personal liberty. However, despite their significance, they are not beyond crRead more
Fundamental rights, governed under Part III of the Indian Constitution are vital in safeguarding the liberties and freedoms of Indian citizens. These rights form the cornerstone of democratic governance protecting life and personal liberty. However, despite their significance, they are not beyond criticism. The key criticisms include:
Article 12 defines “State” to include the Government and Parliament of India, each state’s legislature, and all local and municipal authorities and bodies within the territory of India. Fundamental Rights are primarily enforced against the state and not against private individuals or entities. This limitation leaves individuals without recourse where violations occur in private spheres and by non-state actors.
Article 359 of the Indian Constitution permits suspending most fundamental rights during a state of emergency. This has been criticized for potentially enabling an authoritarian governance and regime and undermining civil liberties. This was evident during the emergency of 1975-1977 which led to widespread abuse of power. The Habeas Corpus Case (ADM Jabalpur v Shivkant Shukhla, 1976) was also controversial concerning the emergency, where the right to seek judicial review under Article 21 could be suspended during an emergency.
Preventive detention laws allow the state to detain individuals without trial, which can be misused to suppress political dissent, and target activists and minority groups. This practice undermines civil liberties and fundamental principles of justice and human rights. Moreover, this violates Article 22, where individuals are detained without a fair trial or due process.
Fundamental rights do not cover social and economic rights and such rights are included under the Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV of the Constitution) and are non-justiciable. This limits their enforceability and reduces the state’s accountability in fulfilling these rights.
There is an inherent tension between Fundamental rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy where balancing individual rights with broader social and economic goals often proves challenging. Additionally, judicial interpretation of Fundamental Rights, though progressive, raises concerns about overreach and potential conflicts with the legislative branch.
Fundamental Rights play a crucial role in safeguarding personal freedoms and upholding democratic principles, yet their boundaries and susceptibility to misuse underline the need for ongoing evaluation and careful interpretation.
See less
The Bhakti Movement, which emerged in medieval India between the 7th and 17th centuries, was a socio-religious reform movement emphasizing personal devotion (bhakti) to a chosen deity as the path to spiritual realization. It sought to democratize religion by advocating direct communion with the diviRead more
The Bhakti Movement, which emerged in medieval India between the 7th and 17th centuries, was a socio-religious reform movement emphasizing personal devotion (bhakti) to a chosen deity as the path to spiritual realization. It sought to democratize religion by advocating direct communion with the divine, bypassing the intermediary role of priests and elaborate rituals. This movement cut across caste and class boundaries, attracting followers from all strata of society, including women and those traditionally marginalized.
One of the significant contributions of the Bhakti Movement to Indian culture was its role in fostering religious tolerance and unity. By emphasizing the universal love for God and de-emphasizing doctrinal differences, it promoted harmony among different religious communities. This inclusivity helped in integrating diverse cultural elements into a shared spiritual ethos.
Furthermore, the Bhakti Movement enriched Indian literature and music. Bhakti poets composed devotional verses in vernacular languages accessible to the common people, thereby democratizing access to religious texts. This literature not only preserved spiritual teachings but also celebrated the human experience, emotions, and moral values.
In essence, the Bhakti Movement transcended mere religious reform; it influenced Indian culture profoundly by promoting spiritual egalitarianism, cultural synthesis, and the democratization of religious practices and literature. Its enduring legacy continues to resonate in contemporary Indian society, emphasizing the unity of all beings through love and devotion to the divine.
See lessWhat is the significance of Rowlatt Satyagraha of 1919?
The Rowlatt Satyagraha of 1919 was a significant event in India's struggle for independence from British colonial rule. Here's the significance of this movement: Defiance of Draconian Laws: The Rowlatt Acts, passed in 1919, empowered the British government to arrest and detain individuals without trRead more
The Rowlatt Satyagraha of 1919 was a significant event in India’s struggle for independence from British colonial rule. Here’s the significance of this movement:
The amendment procedure under the Indian Constitution has been the subject of various criticisms over the years. Here are some of the key criticisms: 1. Rigidity vs. Flexibility Rigidity: Some critics argue that the amendment procedure is too rigid, making it difficult to adapt to changing circumstaRead more
The amendment procedure under the Indian Constitution has been the subject of various criticisms over the years. Here are some of the key criticisms:
1. Rigidity vs. Flexibility
Rigidity: Some critics argue that the amendment procedure is too rigid, making it difficult to adapt to changing circumstances. The requirement for a supermajority in both houses of Parliament and ratification by half of the state legislatures for certain amendments can be challenging to achieve.
Flexibility: Others argue that the procedure is too flexible, allowing for frequent and sometimes whimsical changes to the Constitution. This could potentially undermine the stability and sanctity of the constitutional framework.
2. Parliamentary Supremacy
Excessive Power to Parliament: Critics argue that the Parliament has excessive power to amend the Constitution, which could lead to misuse. There are concerns that a ruling party with a strong majority could amend the Constitution to serve its interests rather than the public good.
Lack of Direct Public Involvement: Unlike some other countries, there is no provision for a public referendum on constitutional amendments in India. This means that significant changes can be made without direct input from the electorate.
3.Judicial Review
Scope of Judicial Review: There have been debates over the scope of judicial review concerning constitutional amendments. The Kesavananda Bharati case established the “basic structure doctrine,” which holds that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be altered. Critics argue that this gives the judiciary excessive power over constitutional amendments, potentially leading to judicial overreach.
Uncertainty and Ambiguity: The “basic structure doctrine” can be seen as vague and subject to interpretation, leading to uncertainty about which parts of the Constitution can be amended and which cannot.
4. Federal Concerns
State Involvement: The requirement for state ratification for certain amendments is seen as insufficient by some critics. They argue that states should have a greater say in the amendment process, especially for amendments that affect federal structures and state powers.
Centralization of Power: There is a concern that the amendment procedure allows for centralization of power, with the central government having the upper hand in initiating and passing amendments.
5. Political Manipulation
Partisan Amendments: The amendment process can be used for partisan purposes, where changes are made to benefit the ruling party or to undermine opposition parties. This can lead to constitutional amendments that are politically motivated rather than aimed at genuine national interest.
Frequent Amendments: Critics argue that the frequency of amendments can undermine the authority of the Constitution and lead to legal and administrative instability.
6. Complexity and Accessibility
Complex Procedures: The procedures involved in amending the Constitution are complex and not easily understood by the general public. This can lead to a lack of transparency and public engagement in the constitutional amendment process.
Accessibility Issues: The procedural requirements can be seen as inaccessible, making it difficult for meaningful and needed changes to be made efficiently and effectively.
Conclusion
The amendment procedure under the Indian Constitution is designed to balance the need for stability with the need for adaptability. However, it has faced criticism on various grounds, including its perceived rigidity, the potential for parliamentary and judicial overreach, federal concerns, the risk of political manipulation, and the complexity of the process. These criticisms highlight the ongoing debate about how best to structure the process for amending the Constitution to ensure it serves the long-term interests of the nation.
“UCC is a transition step from positive secularism to the ideal of negative secularism.” Elucidate the statement and discuss the implications of the given statement.
The concept of secularism sparks intense debate. It encompasses two main concepts. Positive secularism, followed in India, involves the state recognizing religious coexistence and striving to foster a healthy relationship between religions and the state. It prioritizes minority rights and advRead more
The concept of secularism sparks intense debate. It encompasses two main concepts.
Positive secularism, followed in India, involves the state recognizing religious coexistence and striving to foster a healthy relationship between religions and the state. It prioritizes minority rights and advocates for religious pluralism.
Negative secularism, on the other hand, advocates for a strict separation between religion and the state. It dictates that religion should not interfere in state matters, and vice versa. All religions are considered equal in the eyes of the law.
Uniform Civil Code aims to establish a common set of laws for all citizens, replacing personal laws granted to specific religious communities. It ensures equal treatment of all citizens, regardless of their religion.
Indeed it can be inferred that implementation of UCC in India will be the first step towards achieving the ideal of Negative Secularism . Which is idealised as perfect equality .
Implications of implementing UCC in India can be different across different Communities as :-
It is opposed by some minority communities because it seeks to abbrogate their personal religious laws. And they think that this is unnecessary intervention of government in their religious matter.
While some people thinks UCC is necessary for national integration and Equal treatment of people before law .
It is also written in Directive Principles of State Policy in Constitution Article 44 that “The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.”
I think that UCC is necessary also for stopping illegal religious conversions and stopping the interference of government in all the religions. A uniform code is required to make a strong legal system which will also be effucient .
See less
Pressure groups are organized associations, unions, or organizations of people having common interests. They aim to seek better conditions for their members through organized efforts. They try to influence the legislature, executive, and other decision-makers to make favorable decisions. The stateRead more
Pressure groups are organized associations, unions, or organizations of people having common interests. They aim to seek better conditions for their members through organized efforts. They try to influence the legislature, executive, and other decision-makers to make favorable decisions.
The state of pressure groups in India constitutes an important dimension of the study of politics because the primary objective of any pressure group is to influence the government on a specific public policy issue or problem. Pressure groups do not contest elections and they may not have political programmes. Pressure groups informally attempt to influence the government on a specific public policy issue of a section of society. Freedom of association is generally found in all democratic societies.
This is required to identify and promote common interests or well-being of the people through collective activities. This is regarded as the basic factor which tends to the establishment of pressure groups. So, pressure groups play a crucial role in interest formation and interest aggregation. Pressure groups play a mediatory role between the people and the government. They balance the national interest and the interest of individuals. Generally, the interests of the common people are not organized.
Some prominent Examples of Pressure groups in India are-
Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU): Represents the interests of farmers, especially in northern India.
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS): A Hindu nationalist organization that influences policies through its affiliates like the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Indian Medical Association (IMA): Represents doctors and medical professionals in India.
Bar Council of India: Governs the legal profession and represents lawyers’ interests.
Centre for Science and Environment (CSE): Works on environmental issues and sustainable development.
Amnesty International India: Focuses on human rights issues in India.
See less
The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) is an extra-constitutional body, which finds mention in the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961, where it has been accorded the status of a government department. It is a staff agency, which provides secretarial assistance and advice to the PrimRead more
The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) is an extra-constitutional body, which finds mention in the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961, where it has been accorded the status of a government department. It is a staff agency, which provides secretarial assistance and advice to the Prime Minister. It was called the Prime Minister’s Secretariat and was renamed the PMO in 1977 and is headed by the Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister.
Key functions performed by the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) include:
The PMO’s role in shaping policy-making in India:
The role of the PMO in shaping policy-making in India cannot be understated. It plays a critical part in ensuring that the government’s agenda is translated into tangible policies and programmes that positively impact the lives of the citizens. The PMO’s ability to coordinate various governmental entities and ensure the smooth implementation of policies makes it an indispensable part of the Indian Executive system.
See less