To what extent does the absence of specific provisions for minority rights in education articles affect educational equity, and how can legal reforms address these gaps?
In 2023, the judgment of Kesavananda Bharati case completed fifty years. It established the principle concept of 'Basic Structure Doctrine' wherein the Parliament was restricted to overpower and amend the constitution from its base and beyond limits. The outline of the case can be traced in 1950s anRead more
In 2023, the judgment of Kesavananda Bharati case completed fifty years. It established the principle concept of ‘Basic Structure Doctrine’ wherein the Parliament was restricted to overpower and amend the constitution from its base and beyond limits.
The outline of the case can be traced in 1950s and 1960s in Kerala when to diminish the lines of inequality in resource consumption, land reforms were introduced to redistribute land to landless. The government of Kerala imposed restriction on ownership of the religious land of Edneer Mutt, headed by Sh. Kesavananda Bharti, who challenged the Act of Government of Kerala.
Meanwhile,the Parliament of India introduced three major amendments 24th,25th,29th that somehow curtail the powers of judiciary and put constraints on exercising fundamental rights of citizen as well as the operating power to amend the constitution.
Kesavananda Bharti filed a petition to dismantle these amendments as they shake the bedrock of Constitution.Hence, the Supreme Court established the iconic ‘Basic structure Doctrine’
- The largest bench case (13 judges) in Indian history, made sure to keep a check on the Parliament and that every fundamental right is practised without any unfair bonded constraints.
The milestone judgment has safeguarded the aura of democracy and other values and to uphold the supreme charisma of Indian Constitution.
See less
While India's Constitution protects minority rights in education through Articles 29 and 30 (allowing cultural preservation and establishment of minority institutions), the absence of specific provisions on admissions and resource allocation can hinder educational equity. This lack of clarity mightRead more
While India’s Constitution protects minority rights in education through Articles 29 and 30 (allowing cultural preservation and establishment of minority institutions), the absence of specific provisions on admissions and resource allocation can hinder educational equity. This lack of clarity might lead to unequal access, with some minority institutions struggling to maintain diverse student bodies. Additionally, unclear regulations on government funding could leave these institutions under-resourced compared to others. Legal reforms can address these gaps by defining a minority student ratio in admissions (setting minimum and/or maximum percentages for non-minority students) and mandating reservation in education funding to ensure equitable resource distribution. By implementing these reforms alongside strong monitoring mechanisms, India can ensure minority educational institutions both retain their cultural identity and contribute to a more level playing field in education for all.
See less